High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; writ petition allowed withDirectio...

Mohankrishna v. The District Collector, Land Tribunal (LR), Ottappalam; Village Officer, Ottappalam-II; State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:W.P(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-25
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.No.1622/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment referred to supra. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; writ petition allowed withDirections to dispose of S.M.1622/2019 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Mohankrishna

Respondents

  • The District Collector, Palakkad
  • The Land Tribunal/Special Tahsildar (LR), Ottappalam
  • The Village Officer, Ottapalam-II
  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • P. Jayaram

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt. K. Amminikutty, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the suo motu initiation of S.M.No.1622/2019 by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and seeks a mandamus directing the Second Respondent (Special Tahsildar, LR) to consider and pass orders on the Land Tribunal file. The land involved is 0.3936 hectares in Sy. No. 19/1, Ottapalam II, with the Government holding the landlord’s right, title and interest under Section 72 and a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970. The petitioner relies on the decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and others (2018), which emphasized expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases, preserving seniority, and avoiding out-of-turn disposal that would derail the process. The Court noted the Government’s GO directing faster disposal, and the substantial pendency in Land Tribunal matters (2434 suo motu cases) and directed disposal in strict accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, reinforcing a policy of timely, rule-based resolution consistent with prior judicial directions.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India, Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, Rule 5Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Priority to senior citizens in disposal of Land Tribunal cases
  • Disposal strictly in accordance with seniority and law; not breaking the seniority of registered cases
  • Expeditious disposal of cases before the Land Tribunal as guided by Narayanan Namboodiri judgment

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner urged expeditious disposal of the suo motu proceeding and passing orders in S.M.No.1622/2019. They sought a mandamus directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to decide within a timeframe fixed by the Court, invoking Narayanan Namboodiri to ensure expeditious resolution, maintain seniority, and avoid derailment due to out-of-turn orders. The case concerns the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 and a certificate of purchase under Section 72K; delay affects financing and realisation of rights.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contended for adherence to due process and statutory requirements. They highlighted the large pendency of suo motu matters (2434) and the necessity to obtain reports via Village Officers, as encouraged by GO 2018. They urged disposal in accordance with seniority and the court’s directions, within the statutory and procedural framework.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relied on Narayanan Namboodiri for expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions in Land Tribunal matters.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Mohankrishna v. The District Collector, Land Tribunal (LR), Ottappalam; Village Officer, Ottappalam-II; State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MOHANKRISHNA, AGED 41 YEARS S/O. KUMARAN, NEDUMTHOTTIYIL HOUSE, PATHAPPIRIYAM, EDAVANNA, ERANADU TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR**| |---|---| ||**PALAKKAD - 678001.**| |**2**|**THE LAND TRIBUNAL/SPECIAL TAHSILDAR**| ||**(LAND REFORMS), P.O, KANNIYAMPURAM,**| ||**OTTAPALAM - 679104.**| |**3**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER**| ||**OTTAPALAM - II, VILLAGE OFFICER, P.O,**| ||**OTTAPALAM - 679101.**| |**4**|**STATE OF KERALA**| ||**REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,**| ||**DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT.K AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent 2[nd] Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.1622/2019 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.3936 Hectares of land comprised in Sy.No.19/1 of Ottapalam II Village, Ottapalam Taluk in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Ottapalam-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1622/2019, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 02.09.2019, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam is 2434. W.P(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1622/2019 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.No.1622/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7707 OF 2021(K) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** ## **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 02.09.2019 IN SM NO.1622/2019 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS), OTTAPALAM.** ## **EXHIBIT P2** **TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 04.09.2020 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM OTTAPALAM II, VILLAGE OFFICE WITH REFERENCE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED UNDER EXHIBIT P1 NOTICE.** ## **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 04.09.2020 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM OTTAPALAM - II, VILLAGE OFFICE WITH REFERENCE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED UNDER EXHIBIT P1 NOTICE.**