Miss Jibina Das Y.S. v. Central Board of Secondary Education and Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- P. V. Kunhikrishnan
- Judgment Date
- 2021-12-22
- Court Decision / Holding
- The writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file a formal application before the 3rd respondent within two weeks, disclosing details and documents for changing the mother’s name in Ext.P2; the petitioner must file an affidavit indemnifying CBSE and surrender the original certificate if not already surrendered; the 3rd respondent shall forward the application to the Additional 4th respondent within four weeks; the Additional 4th respondent shall inform the petitioner by email about the administrative expenses and shall process the application and pass appropriate orders in light of paragraphs 170 and 171 of Jigya Yadav v. CBSE within four weeks of receipt of the 3rd respondent’s communication; the question of correcting the CBSE certificates under the Higher Secondary Education system is left open; the petition is disposed of in light of Jigya Yadav (supra).
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Miss Jibina Das Y.S.
Respondents
- Central Board of Secondary Education
- Directorate of Higher Secondary Examination
- The Principal Gyan Ganga International Academy
- The Regional Officer, CBSE, Regional Office, Todarmal Marg, Ajmer, Rajasthan
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Shinto Thomas
- • Alex Joseph
- • Rebinson M.P.
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri Nirmal S., Senior Counsel, CBSE
- • Jasmine M., Government Pleader
Case Synopsis & Summary
Miss Jibina Das Y.S., a 19-year-old petitioner from Thiruvananthapuram, seeks correction of her mother’s name in the CBSE mark statement Ext.P2 from 'Sobhana Das T' to 'Sobhana Kumari T.R.' and, by extension, related CBSE/Higher Secondary Examinations records. The petitioner produced Ext.P1 (mother’s Aadhaar) and Ext.P8 (petitioner’s birth certificate) showing the correct name, and Ext.P2 exhibits the misnamed entry. She contends the error originated at the CBSE record and, despite approaching the 3rd respondent (the school), no corrective steps were taken. The respondent CBSE’s counsel submits that the petitioner must first approach the 3rd respondent, who must forward the application to the Additional 4th respondent, with reliance on Jigya Yadav v. Central Board of Secondary Education (2021 (3) KLT 711). After hearing, the court disposed of the petition by directing a structured course: the petitioner must file a formal application before the 3rd respondent within two weeks detailing the request; file an affidavit indemnifying CBSE; surrender the original certificate if not already done; the 3rd respondent shall forward the application to the 4th respondent within four weeks; the 4th respondent shall inform the petitioner by email of administrative expenses and process the application expeditiously in light of Jigya Yadav’s guidance (para. 170-171); the question of correcting CBSE Certificates under Higher Secondary Education is left open. The petition is disposed of accordingly, with reliance on Jigya Yadav (supra).
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioner contends the mother’s name on Ext.P2 is incorrect and seeks correction in the CBSE mark statement and related records. The Aadhaar and birth certificate corroborate the correct name; the school has failed to rectify. The writ petition seeks mandamus or appropriate orders to correct the record.
Contentions of Respondents
CBSE contends the petitioner must first approach the 3rd respondent (the school), which must forward the application to the Additional 4th respondent; the remedy should follow the Jigya Yadav framework for expedited correction; no direct relief is provided without following the prescribed procedure.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jigya Yadav v. Central Board of Secondary Education | 2021 (3) KLT 711 | Positive | Cited and applied to guide procedural steps for correction in CBSE records; used to justify timelines and forwarding process. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Miss Jibina Das Y.S. v. Central Board of Secondary Education and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.