High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition closed; liberty to challenge term...

MINI PAUL and 16 others v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE) and Others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No.28762/2013

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
Judgment Date
2024-02-23
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition closed. The court, after noting force in the respondents’ maintainability arguments based on precedents, did not adjudicate on the merits and granted liberty to seek remedies through proper channels.
Final Disposition
Writ petition closed; liberty to challenge termination in appropriate fora.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • MINI PAUL
  • APSARA R
  • SHEENA A.K.
  • MINI MOLLY R.K.
  • SHEEBA D.
  • SHINY S.
  • REKHA R.
  • JAMUNA C.
  • GEETHA R.
  • SREELATHA T.
  • SHOBHA NELSON
  • RAJINI A.V.
  • SHEEJA T
  • RENJINI A.
  • SHEEBAMOL A.
  • SHYLAJA SURESH
  • EUGINE MICHAEL

Respondents

  • CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION SHIKSHA KENDRA
  • THE MANAGER MAHATMA CENTRAL SCHOOL
  • THE PRINCIPAL MAHATMA CENTRAL SCHOOL
  • MAHATMA GANDHI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY
  • UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI JOSEPH RONY JOSE
  • • SMT.O.A.NURIYA

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SRI S MANU DSGI
  • • SRI NIRMAL S., SC CBSE

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition challenges the termination of seventeen Pre-Primary teachers employed by Mahatma Central School, Eravipuram (Co-educational, CBSE-affiliated) in Kollam district. The petitioners allege illegality and arbitrariness in the termination proceedings and seek certiorari to quash Ext.P13, declaration that Ext.P3 circular has only prospective effect, reinstatement of the petitioners, and appointment of teachers with higher educational qualifications in Primary/High School/Higher Secondary classes, as per undertakings in WP(C) No.12450/2013. The petition relies on the claim that the CBSE directive and the school’s actions violate statutory protections and due process for teaching staff. The respondents CBSE, the school manager, principal, the Mahatma Gandhi Educational and Charitable Society, and the Union of India contend that maintainability of a writ petition is defeated in light of established precedents and that Ext.P3’s effect is prospective. They argue that the matter concerns internal regulatory actions within CBSE-aligned institutions, not an actionable grievance under writ jurisdiction, and point to division bench precedents in Sommy Kunjappan and Sindhu S. to justify closure of the petition. The court ultimately agrees with the respondents on maintainability, records force in the precedents, and closes the petition, reserving liberty to pursue appropriate relief through other lawful channels.

Provisions of Law Cited

CBSE Bye-Laws, Chapter IX

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that their termination from service as Pre-Primary teachers, under the CBSE framework via Ext.P3, is illegal and arbitrary. They assert a statutory violation and emphasize undertakings given to this Court in related matters, seeking reinstatement and appointment of those with higher qualifications in teaching posts as per undertakings. They request quashing Ext.P13 and declaring Ext.P3's effect as prospective only, arguing that due process protections and equitable considerations require restoration of service status. They rely on the Court’s past assurances and the right to challenge termination under proper legal channels while maintaining that the CBSE framework cannot be used to arbitrarily dismiss teachers without due process.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents submit that the petition is not maintainable in light of Division Bench authorities, notably Sommy Kunjappan and Ors. v. CBSE (2019 (2) KHC 1) and Sindhu S. and Ors. v. Raja Ravi Varma Central School (ILR 2022 (3) Ker) 996). They contend Ext.P3’s circular effect is prospective and within the CBSE Bye-Laws (Chapter IX); termination actions are internal regulatory matters, not reducible to a writ petition. The counsel argues that the Court should dismiss the petition with liberty to challenge termination through appropriate forums, as per established precedents, and that the petition fails on maintainability rather than on merits.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sommy Kunjappan and Ors. v. Central Board of Secondary Education and Ors.2019 (2) KHC 1PositiveCited as binding authority on the maintainability scope of writ petitions in CBSE-related termination matters; court recognises its force in concluding the petition’s maintainability.
Sindhu S. and Ors. v. Raja Ravi Varma Central School and Ors.ILR 2022 (3) (Ker) 996PositiveCited alongside the first case to reinforce the adverse view on maintainability; used to support the dismissal/closure of the petition.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against MINI PAUL and 16 others v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE) and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN`** ## **`FRIDAY, THE 23[RD] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1945`** ## **`WP(C) NO. 28762 OF 2013`** ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** - `1 MINI PAUL, AGED 44 YEARS W/O.R.JAYAKUMAR JOSEPH, BHARANETHU VEEDU, AYATHIL P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `2 APSARA R, AGED 40 YEARS W/O.K.SANTHOSH KUMAR, SARASWATHY VILASAM, SNEHANAGAR 141, ULIYAKOVIL P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `3 SHEENA A.K., AGED 39 YEARS W/O.R.ANIL KUMAR, LALITHA SADANAM, AKKOLICHERRY, VALATHUNGAL P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `4 MINI MOLLY R.K., AGED 38 YEARS W/O.V.JAYAKUMAR, VALIYA VEEDU, AKKOLICHERRY, KOOTTIKADA P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `5 SHEEBA D., AGED 47 YEARS D/O.DIVAKARAN, SUDARSANALAYAM, SREE SARAVANA NAGAR, ERAVIPURAM P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN 691 011.` - `6 SHINY S., AGED 32 YEARS D/O.SHADEVAN R, REJANI NIVAS, KARTIKKUZHI, MAYYANAD P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN 691 303.` - `7 REKHA R., AGED 45 YEARS, D/O.CHAKRAPANI, MULAVARAZHIKOM, MAYYANAD P.O, KOLLAM 691 303.` - `8 JAMUNA C., AGED 46 YEARS D/O.P.CHELLAPPAN CHETTIYAR, KOLLENTAZHIKOM, MAYYANAD P.O, KOLLAM 691 303.` - `9 GEETHA R., AGED 41 YEARS D/O.V.R.NAYANANA PILLAI, KIZHAKKADATHU VEEDU, AYATHIL P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `10 SREELATHA T., AGED 44 YEARS D/O.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, CHAPLAZHIKKATHU VEEDU, SAR` **`IN`** - `11 SHOBHA NELSON, AGED 37 YEARS, D/O.BALAKRISHNAN V.G, SONIYAS, VALATHUGAL P.O, KOLLAM 691 018.` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 2 - `12 RAJINI A.V., AGED 45 YEARS D/O.K.VIDYADHARAN, RAJINI NIVAS, KARIKKUZHY, MAYYANAD P.O, KOLLAM 691 303.` - `13 SHEEJA T, AGED 38 YEARS D/O.KUNJUKRISHNAN R, PRASAD MANDIRAM, THEKKEVILA P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `14 RENJINI A., AGED 39 YEARS D/O.SOMARAJAN G, UTHRADAM, DEECAT JN P.O, MUKHATHALA KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `15 SHEEBAMOL A., AGED 28 YEARS D/O.SIDADASAN S, CHEMBAKAZHIKOM, ERAVIPURAM P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `16 SHYLAJA SURESH, AGED 46 YEARS D/O.SARASAMMA, V.S BHAVAN, VADAKKEVILA NAGAR, A-82, PATTATHANAM P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` - `17 EUGINE MICHAEL, AGED 54 YEARS D/O.P.WILSON, WILSON VILLA, KAKKOTHUMOOLA, MAYYANAD P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT.` ``` BY ADVS. ``` - `SRI.JOSEPH RONY JOSE SMT.O.A.NURIYA` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** - `1 CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION SHIKSHA KENDRA, 2ND FLOOR, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, NEW DELHI 110 092, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.` ``` 2THE MANAGER MAHATMA CENTRAL SCHOOL, ERAVIPURAM P.O, KOLLAM (CBSE AFFILIATION NO.930226), PIN 691 011. ``` - `3 THE PRINCIPAL` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 3 ``` MAHATMA CENTRAL SCHOOL, ERAVIPURAM.P.O, KOLLAM, PIN-691 011. ``` ``` 4MAHATMA GANDHI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY MAHATMA NAGAR, ERAVIPURAM POST, KOLLAM 691 011 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ``` ``` 5UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-110001. ``` ``` SRI S MANU DSGI, SRI NIRMAL S., SC CBSE ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 4 ## P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J. --------------------------------------- ## WP(C) No.28762 of 2013 ---------------------------------------------Dated this the 23[rd] day of February, 2024 ## JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: - (i) Issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext.P13 proceedings and quash the same; - (ii) Declare that Ext.P3 circular is having only prospective effect and the termination of the services of the petitioners on the basis of Ext.P3 is illegal and arbitrary; - (iii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 4 to reinstate the petitioners in service of Mahatma Central School; - (iv) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 4 to appoint those petitioners who are having higher educational qualifications, as teachers in Primary/High School/Higher Secondary classes, in compliance with the undertaking given to this Hon’ble Court in WP(C) No.12450/2013.” 2. The main prayer is against the illegal termination of Pre Primary teachers who were working in a CBSE School. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel for the CBSE submitted that, in the light of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Sommy ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 5 Kunjappan and Ors. v. Central Board of Secondary Education and Ors. [2019 (2) KHC 1] and Sindhu S. and Ors. v. Raja Ravi Varma Central School and Ors. [ILR 2022 (3) (Ker) 996], the writ petition is not maintainable. There is force in the argument of the learned Standing Counsel. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, there is statutory violation. If that is the case, the writ petition can be closed granting liberty to challenge the termination of service and for other reliefs before the appropriate court in accordance with law. Liberty granted. With the above observation, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- ncd P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 6 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28762/2013`** ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS ``` ``` EXHIBIT P1 ``` ``` COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE CBSE SCHOOL DIRECTORY. ``` ``` COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED EXHIBIT P26.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE IST PETITIONER. ``` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(A) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER.` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(B) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 3RD PETITIONER.` ``` COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED EXHIBIT P2(C)6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 4TH PETITIONER. ``` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(D) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 5TH PETITIONER.` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(E) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 6TH PETITIONER.` ``` COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED EXHIBIT P2(F)6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 7TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED EXHIBIT P2(G)6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 8TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED EXHIBIT P2(H)6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 9TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 7 - `EXHIBIT P2(I)` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 10TH PETITIONER.` - `EXHIBIT P2(J)` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 11TH PETITIONER.` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(K) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 12TH PETITIONER.` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(L) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 13TH PETITIONER.` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(M) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 14TH PETITIONER.` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(N) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 15TH PETITIONER.` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(O) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 16TH PETITIONER.` - `COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED` - `EXHIBIT P2(P) 6.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE 17TH PETITIONER.` - `EXHIBIT P3` - `COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.19 DATED 6.3.2012.` - `COPY OF THE ORDER IN WPC` - `EXHIBIT P4 NO.12450/2013 DATED 23.7.2013 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.` - `EXHIBIT P5` - `COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013.` - `COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 2ND` - `EXHIBIT P5(A) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013.` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 8 ``` COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 3RD EXHIBIT P5(B) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 4TH EXHIBIT P5(C) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 5TH EXHIBIT P5(D) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 6TH EXHIBIT P5(E) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 7TH EXHIBIT P5(F) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 8TH EXHIBIT P5(G) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 9TH EXHIBIT P5(H) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 10TH EXHIBIT P5(I) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 11TH EXHIBIT P5(J) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 12TH EXHIBIT P5(K) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 13TH EXHIBIT P5(L) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 14TH EXHIBIT P5(M) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 15TH EXHIBIT P5(N) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 16TH EXHIBIT P5(O) PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. EXHIBIT P5(P)COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 17TH PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2013. ``` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 9 ``` EXHIBIT P6 ``` ``` COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT IN WPC NO.12450/2013 DATED 4.6.2013. ``` - `EXHIBIT P7` ``` COPY OF THE REPLY AFFIDAVIT IN WPC NO.12450/2013 DATED 18.6.2013. ``` - `COPY OF THE RELEVANT LAW REGULATING` - `EXHIBIT P8 THE SERVICE CONDITIONS I.E CHAPTER IX, OF THE CBSE BYE LAWS.` - `EXHIBIT P9` ``` COPY OF THE PETITION IA NO.7505/2013 DATED 4.6.2013. ``` - `EXHIBIT P10` - `COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT IN IA NO.7505/2013 DATED 18.6.2013.` ``` EXHIBIT P11 ``` ``` COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.12450/2013 DATED 23.9.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE IST PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 2ND PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12(A)EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 3RD PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12(B)EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P12(C)COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 4TH PETITIONERS EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 10 ``` EXHIBIT P12(D) ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 5TH PETITIONERS EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 6TH PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12(E)EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 7TH PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12(F)EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 8TH PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12(G)EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 9TH PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12(H)EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 10TH PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12(I)EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P12(J)COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 11TH PETITIONERS EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED ``` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 11 ``` 26.8.2013. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P12(K) ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 12TH PETITIONERS EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P12(L) ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 13TH PETITIONERS EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 14TH PETITIONERS ``` ``` EXHIBIT P12(M) ``` ``` EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P12(N) ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 15TH PETITIONERS EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P12(O) ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 16TH PETITIONERS EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ENCLOSING THE DETAILS OF THE 17TH PETITIONERS EXHIBIT P12(P)EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WITH COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS DATED 26.8.2013. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE IST ``` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 12 ``` PETITIONER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(A) ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(B) ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 3RD PETITIONER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(C) ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 4TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(D) ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 5TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(E) ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 6TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(F) ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 7TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(G) ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 8TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(H)COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 9TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` WP(C) No.28762/2013 ``` 13 ``` EXHIBIT P13(I) ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(J) ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(K) ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(L) ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(M) ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(N) ``` ``` EXHIBIT P13(O) ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 10TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 11TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 12TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 13TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 14TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 15TH PETITIONER. ``` ``` COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL DATED 27.8.2013 ISSUED TO THE 16TH PETITIONER. ```