High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeApplication allowed; bail granted with conditions.

Milton Das v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:BA 1438 of 2024
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C. S. Dias
Judgment Date
2024-02-28
Court Decision / Holding
The bail application is allowed; petitioner Milton Das is to be released on bail on a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two solvent sureties of like amount, subject to conditions (i)-(ix) including regular appearance, no inducement or tampering, surrender of passport if any, provision of address and mobile number, and restriction on leaving the jurisdiction; IO may investigate or effect recoveries as per law. The decision emphasizes liberal bail principles from Hussainara Khatoon and supports lawful police recoveries as noted in Sushila Aggarwal.
Final Disposition
Application allowed; bail granted with conditions.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Milton Das

Respondents

  • State of Kerala
  • The Excise Inspector, Excise Range Office, Thiruvananthapuram

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Arun Chand
  • • Vinayak G Menon
  • • Bharat Vijay P.
  • • Thareeq Anver K.
  • • K. Salma Jennath
  • • Minu Vittoria Paulson

Counsels for Respondents

  • • C S HrithwIk

Case Synopsis & Summary

Milton Das v. State of Kerala concerns a bail application under Section 439 CrPC in NDPS case relating to 1.3 kg of ganja seized for sale near Palappooru junction, Kalliyoor Village, Thiruvananthapuram. Accused was arrested on 27 October 2023. The prosecution alleges possession for sale of contraband under NDPS Act, Section 20(b)(ii)(B). The petitioner maintains innocence, claims false implication and that he has been in custody since 27.10.2023. The investigation is complete, recovery effected, and the final report laid. The State contends bail should be refused given lack of roots in Kerala and danger of flight, though concedes no prior antecedents and that investigation has progressed to near completion. After hearing submissions, the Hon’ble Judge found that the contraband was of an intermediate quantity, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, investigation is practically complete, and the final report has been laid. Relying on the liberal bail principle in Hussainara Khatoon (I) and the guidance on bail and recovery in Sushila Aggarwal, the court allowed bail on stringent conditions. The petitioner is to execute a bond for Rs. 50,000 with two solvent sureties, and must appear before the IO on Tuesdays and Saturdays, refrain from any inducement or tampering, surrender any passport, furnish address and mobile number, and not leave the jurisdiction without permission. The decision was delivered by Justice C. S. Dias on 28 February 2024.

Provisions of Law Cited

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 439Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(B)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Hussainara Khatoon (I) v. Home Secy., State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81 – liberal bail principle / presumption of liberty
  • Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another [2020 (1) KHC 663] – authority for police recoveries while on bail / bail-related powers

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends total innocence, false implication, confinement since 27.10.2023, completed investigation, recovery effected, no criminal antecedents; seeks bail on grounds of liberty and lack of Kerala roots.

Contentions of Respondents

The State opposes bail citing lack of roots in Kerala and risk of fleeing; concedes no antecedents, investigation complete, final report laid, but submits bail should be refused.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Hussainara Khatoon (I) v. Home Secy., State of Bihar(1980) 1 SCC 81PositiveCourt explicitly relies on liberal bail principles from this decision to justify granting bail.
Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another[2020 (1) KHC 663]PositiveCited to endorse the proposition that police may carry out recoveries and investigations even when the accused is on bail.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Milton Das v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

``` IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ``` ## `PRESENT` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 28[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 1438 OF 2024 ``` ``` CRIME NO.55/2023 OF TRIVANDRUM EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, ``` ``` THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ``` ## `PETITIONER/ACCUSED:` ``` MILTON DAS AGED 27 YEARS S/O USHARAJAN DAS, VIII/TOWN, HOWRAGHAT, BORBALI - 2, KARBI ANGLOG DISTRICT, ASSAM, PIN - 782481 BY ADVS. ARUN CHAND VINAYAK G MENON BHARAT VIJAY P. THAREEQ ANVER K. K.SALMA JENNATH MINU VITTORRIA PAULSON ``` ## `RESPONDENTS/STATE:` ``` 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 THE EXCISE INSPECTOR EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 682031 ``` ``` BY SR PP SRI C S HRITHWIK ``` ``` THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` B.A. No.1438 of 2024 2 ## **Dated this the 28[th] day of February, 2024** ## **ORDER** The application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the sole accused in Crime No.55/2023 of the Thiruvananthapuram Excise Range Office, Thiruvananthapuram, registered against him for allegedly committing the offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, ‘the Act’). The petitioner was arrested on 27.10.2023. 2. The prosecution case is that: on 27.10.2023, at about 11.15 a.m, the accused was found in possession of 1.300 kg of Ganja, for the purpose of sale near Palappooru junction, Kalliyoor Village, in contravention of the provisions of the NDPS Act. Thus, the accused have committed the above offences. 3. Heard; Sri. Arun Chand, the learned counsel B.A. No.1438 of 2024 3 appearing for the petitioner and Sri. C.S. Hrithwik. the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is totally innocent of the accusations levelled against him. He has been falsely implicated in the crime. The petitioner has been languishing in custody since 27.10.2023. The investigation in the case is complete, the recovery has been effected and the final report has been laid. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. He contended that the petitioner has no roots in the State of Kerala. If the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every likelihood of him fleeing from justice. Hence, the application may be dismissed. Nonetheless, he conceded to the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, the investigation in the case is complete, B.A. No.1438 of 2024 4 and the final report has been laid. 6. On a consideration of the facts, the rival submissions made across the Bar, the materials placed on record, particularly taking note of the fact that the contraband that was allegedly seized from the petitioner is of an intermediate quantity, that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, that the investigation in the case is practically complete, and that the final report has been laid, I am of the definite view that the petitioner’s further detention is not necessary. Hence, I am inclined to allow the bail application, but subject to the stringent condition, especially since the petitioner has no roots in the State of Kerala, but by following the law laid by the Honourable Supreme Court in **Hussainara Khatoon (I) v. Home Secy., State of Bihar** [(1980) 1 SCC 81]. In the result, the application is allowed, by directing the petitioner to be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with B.A. No.1438 of 2024 5 two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, which shall be subject to the following conditions: : (i) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every Tuesday and Saturday between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m till the conclusion of the proceedings in the above crime. He shall also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever; (iii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while he is on bail; (iv) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the court below at the time of execution of the B.A. No.1438 of 2024 6 bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to the effect before the court below on the date of execution of the bond; (v) The petitioner shall furnish his present address and his mobile phone number to the court below and the Investigating Officer; (vi) The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the Court of Session, Thiruvananthapuram, without the previous permission of the court below. (vii) In case of violation of any of the conditions mentioned above, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law. (viii) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall be filed and entertained before the court below. (ix) Needless to mention, it would be well within the B.A. No.1438 of 2024 7 powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in **Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another [2020 (1) KHC 663]** . Sd/- **C.S.DIAS, JUDGE** mtk/28.02.24 B.A. No.1438 of 2024 8 ## **`APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 1438/2024`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES ``` ``` ANNEXURE A1 ``` ``` THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06/12/2023 IN CRL. M.P. NO.12550/2023 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT - 1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ``` ## **`ANNEXURE A2`** ``` THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05/02/2024 IN CRL. M.P. NO.1190/2024 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT - IV, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ```