High Court of KeralaSingle JudgePetition disposed of with directions to the Lan...

Meeran Sahib v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and Land Tribunal Ottappalam

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-02-04
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.966/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri and incorporating G.O. 2018/ RD, with no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Petition disposed of with directions to the Land Tribunal to expedite disposal in line with Narayanan Namboodiri and the 2018 Government Order; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Meeran Sahib

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (LR)
  • Land Tribunal Ottappalam

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. SRI.BABY MATHEW

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K.AMMINIKUTTY - Sr Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a mandamus directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.966/2020 before the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam. The petition concerns suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petitioner claims urgency—he contends that a purchase certificate is required to obtain bank finance—and urges the Court to ensure expeditious disposal, citing the need to uphold the priority of senior citizens and to avoid derailing the process by out-of-turn disposal. The judgment recalls the decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (2018), which held that tribunals must dispose of cases in order of registration and that senior citizens must be given priority; it also notes Government instructions (G.O. 2018) to expedite disposal and to obtain reports through Village Officers if required. The High Court directs the Land Tribunal Ottappalam to dispose of S.M.966/2020 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directives, incorporating the 2018 government order, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99 (Land Tribunals)Rule 5 of Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to compel the respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.966/2020 before the Land Tribunal. He emphasizes urgency for obtaining a certificate of purchase to secure bank finance and argues for expeditious disposal in line with prior directions ensuring seniority and avoiding delay.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents urge that disposal should follow established law and directions, noting the pendency of suo motu proceedings and the feasibility of obtaining reports through Village Officers; they acknowledge the need for priority to senior citizens and advocate disposal following Narayanan Namboodiri directions and the 2018 Government Order.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited for expeditious disposal guidelines and seniority-based disposal adopted in this case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Meeran Sahib v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and Land Tribunal Ottappalam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 15TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MEERAN SAHIB, AGED 50 YEARS S/O KAREEM, RESIDING AT THEKKEMURIYIL, PUTHIYANKAM P O, ALATHUR, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678545.** **BY ADV. SRI.BABY MATHEW** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) AND LAND TRIBUNAL OTTAPALAM MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, OTTAPALAM P O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.966/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0141 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.211/21 in Block No.27 of Alathur Village, Alathur Taluk in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the W.P(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E) -4- jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the W.P(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E) -5- cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending ## W.P(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E) -6- before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Alathur Village, the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.966/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 25.11.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. W.P(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E) -7- 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam is 2434. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.966/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M.No.966/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2843 OF 2021(E) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DED NO. 455/2017 OF SRO, ALATHUR.** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 06.10.2020 ISSUED FROM ALATHUR VILLAGE OFFICE.** **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 25/11/2020 IN SM NO. 966/2020 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL , OTTAPALAM.**