High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed

Mary Joseph v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi and The Village Officer, Mangalamdam Village and Post, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F)
Neutral Citation:/null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-26
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.217/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri, referred to supra. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Mary Joseph

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi
  • The Village Officer, Mangalamdam Village and Post, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri R. Sreehari
  • • Sri M. Krishna Das
  • • Smt. Sajitha M

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Mary Joseph filed WP(C).No.5860 of 2021 under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.217/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, concerning the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal based on a report of the Village Officer (Mangalam Dam Village). The petitioner, an 86-year-old senior citizen, argues that delays impede access to loans and the exercise of her rights, urging mandamus to expedite computation and disposal. The respondents contend that the Land Tribunal faces extensive pendency (over 11,000 cases) and must dispose matters in accordance with law and seniority, without disrupting the established process. The court cites Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) and others, noting directions to prioritize senior citizens and to dispose cases on seniority, within specified time frames. The judgment ultimately directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.217/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, reinforcing the existing framework for speedy adjudication while maintaining seniority.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that as a senior citizen aged 86, she seeks mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.217/2021 before the Land Tribunal Pattambi, to secure a purchase certificate under Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act; she relies on Narayanan Namboodiri to press for expeditious disposal and adherence to seniority, and points to the large pendency in the Land Tribunal.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents note the current pendency (around 11,078 suo motu matters) and emphasize disposal in accordance with seniority; they reference the Government guidance in G.O. 09/2018/RD to streamline processes via Village Officers and assert that the Land Tribunal should proceed following due process within the established framework.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCourt relies on Narayanan Namboodiri for expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions, applying those directions to the present matter.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Mary Joseph v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi and The Village Officer, Mangalamdam Village and Post, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MARY JOSEPH, AGED 86 YEARS W/O LATE P.V.JOSEPH, PUNNELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAZHEKAD POST, KAROOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 697.** **BY ADVS. SRI.R.SREEHARI SRI.M.KRISHNA DAS SMT.SAJITHA M** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), PATTABI AT MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM-679 104. 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANGALAMDAM VILLAGE AND POST, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 706.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.217/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 2.6315 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.399/1 in Block No.49 of Mangalam Dam Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Mangalam Dam Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.217/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 17.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 86 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. W.P(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.217/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.217/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.5860 OF 2021(F) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 PHOTO COPY OF DEATH CERTIFICATE OF P V JOSEPH ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION OF THRISSUR** **EXHIBIT P2 PHOTO COPY OF FAMILY MEMBER SHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT** **EXHIBIT P3** **PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 17.2.2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT** **EXHIBIT P4 PHOTO COPY OF AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER** **EXHIBIT P5 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO 28398/2017 ETC OF THIS COURT DATED 14.3.2018** **EXHIBIT P6 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO 1134/2021 OF THIS COURT DATED 18.1.2021**