High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeThe petitions were disposed of by common order:...

Manjumol Varghese v. Binu Andrews (Transfer Petitions, TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022)

Case / Petition Number:TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C.S. Dias
Judgment Date
2023-02-24
Court Decision / Holding
The transfers are disposed of as follows: (i) TR.P(C) 654/2022 is dismissed. (ii) TR.P(C) 42/2023 is allowed; OP Nos. 142/2021 and 292/2022 are withdrawn from Muvattupuzha and transferred to Ettumanoor for consolidation with OP 1374/2022. (iii) The parties may move the Family Court, Ettumanoor for consolidation and joint trial. (iv) The Registry shall transmit the records of OPs 142/2021 and 292/2022 to Ettumanoor. (v) Ettumanoor shall post the cases along OP 1374/2022. ma/24.2.2023.” ,
Final Disposition
The petitions were disposed of by common order: TR.P(C)654/2022 dismissed; TR.P(C)42/2023 allowed with transfer of OP Nos.142/2021 and 292/2022 from Muvattupuzha to Ettumanoor for consolidation with OP 1374/2022; parties permitted to seek consolidation; Registry to transmit records; Ettumanoor to post the records along with OP 1374/2022; case to be consolidated for joint trial.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Manjumol Varghese
  • Binu Andrews

Respondents

  • Binu Andrews
  • Manjumol Varghese

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • M.M. Laiju Nissa
  • • Biju Abraham

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Biju Abraham
  • • M.M. Laiju Nissa

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a common order of the Kerala High Court in two transfer petitions between the same parties, filed under TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 (wife seeking transfer of OP Nos. 142/2021 and 292/2022 from Family Court, Muvattupuzha, to Ettumanoor) and 654/2022 (husband seeking transfer of OP No. 1374/2022 from Ettumanoor to Muvattupuzha). The court, noting that matrimonial transfer law is well-settled and not res integra, relies on Supreme Court and High Court judgments emphasizing convenience of the wife and children as the guiding criterion for transfer. After considering pleadings, the court exercises its discretionary power under Section 24 CPC to transfer OPs 142/2021 and 292/2022 to Ettumanoor for joint trial with OP 1374/2022, thereby enabling consolidation and saving judicial time. Consequently, TR.P(C)654/2022 is dismissed, and TR.P(C)42/2023 is allowed with directions to transmit records to Ettumanoor and for consolidation. The court directs the Family Court, Ettumanoor to post the matters along with OP 1374/2022 and to transmit the records from Muvattupuzha to Ettumanoor. The order ends with the judge’s signature and a ma/24.2.2023 date.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Convenience of the woman and children as the governing criterion for transfer in matrimonial disputes (as laid down in Sumitha Sing v. Kumar Sanjay and others; Mona Aresh Goel v. Aresh Satya Goel; Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap v. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap; Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh; N.C.V Aishwarya v. A.S Saravana Karthik Sha)
  • Law on transfer of matrimonial proceedings not being res integra (reliance on Supreme Court declarations)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner-wife contends that transfer of O.Ps 142/2021 and 292/2022 from Family Court, Muvattupuzha to Ettumanoor would facilitate joint trial with OP 1374/2022, save travel from Changassery to Muvattupuzha, and avoid conflicting decisions. She urges consolidation to ensure efficient adjudication and convenience for herself and any children involved.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent-husband argues for transfer of OP 1374/2022 from Ettumanoor to Muvattupuzha, noting that he has already filed two cases there; he asserts consolidation is feasible only if cases are in a single court, highlighting the convenience of remaining within the same jurisdiction.

Cited Precedents (5)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sumitha Sing v. Kumar Sanjay and another2002 KHC 1889PositiveCited as a leading authority establishing that the convenience of the wife and children governs transfer in matrimonial disputes.
Mona Aresh Goel v. Aresh Satya Goel2000 KHC 1835PositiveCited for the principle governing transfer based on convenience and welfare of the family.
Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap v. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap2016 KHC 6489PositiveCited to reinforce the convenience principle in transfer decisions.
Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh2017 (5) KHC 48PositiveCited as authority on transfer in matrimonial matters in favor of convenience-based transfer.
N.C.V Aishwarya v. A.S Saravana Karthik Sha2022 (5) KHC 182PositiveCited for continuing judicial policy that convenience of the wife and children drives transfer decisions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Manjumol Varghese v. Binu Andrews (Transfer Petitions, TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 1 ``` # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 24[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1944 ``` ``` TR.P(C) NO. 42 OF 2023 ``` ``` AGAINST OP 142/2021 & O.P. 292/2022 OF FAMILY COURT,MOOVATTUPUZHA ``` ## **`PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:`** ``` MANJUMOL VARGHESE AGED 28 YEARS D/O. MARKOSE VARGHESE, NADUVILEPARAMBIL VEEDU, CHELAKOMBU P.O, NEDUMKUNNAM VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,, PIN - 686540 BY ADV M.M.LAIJU NISSA ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:`** ``` BINU ANDREWS AGED 36 YEARS S/O. ANDREWS, PAREKUNNEL HOUSE, PIRAVOM P.O, PIRAVOM BHAGAM, PIRAVOM KARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 686664, PIN - 686664 ``` ``` BY ADV BIJU ABRAHAM ``` ``` THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.02.2023, ALONG WITH Tr.P(C)654/2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 2 ``` ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS ``` ``` FRIDAY, THE 24[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1944 TR.P(C) NO. 654 OF 2022 ``` ``` AGAINST OP NO.1374/2022 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM ``` ## **`PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:`** ``` BINU ANDREWS AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. ANDREWS, PAREKUNNEL HOUSE, PIRAVOM P.O., PIRAVOM BHAGAM, PIRAVOM KARA,, PIN - 686664 BY ADV BIJU ABRAHAM ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:`** ``` MANJUMOL VARGHESE AGED 28 YEARS D/O. MARKOSE VARGHESE NADUVILEPARAMBIL VEEDU, CHELAKOMBU P.O., NEDUMKUNNAM VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686540 ``` ``` BY ADV M.M.LAIJU NISSA ``` ``` THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.02.2023, ALONG WITH Tr.P(C).42/2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 3 ``` ## **COMMON ORDER** As these transfer petitions are between the same parties, they have been disposed of by this common order. 2. Tr.P.(C)No.42/2023 is filed by the wife against the husband to transfer O.P Nos.142/2021 and 292/2022 (Annexures-A & B) from the Family Court, Muvattupuzha to the Family Court, Ettumanoor. Tr.P.(C) No. 654/2022 is filed by the husband against the wife to transfer O.P.No.1374/2022 from the Family Court, Ettumanur to the Family Court, Muvattupuzha. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as per the status in Tr.P.(C) No. 42/2023 which is treated as the leading case. 3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, in Tr.P (C) No.42 of 2023 is that, she is the wife of the respondent. The marital relationship is strained. She has filed O.P.No. ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` **==> picture [8 x 9] intentionally omitted <==** 1374/2022 before the Family Court, Ettumanoor against the respondent seeking a decree for recovery of money and for other ancillary reliefs. She has also filed M.C. No.74/2021 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Changanassery, against the respondent invoking the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The respondent is contesting the above two proceedings before the two courts in Kottayam. As a counter-blast to the above proceedings, the respondent has filed O.P.Nos.142/2021 and 292/2022 before the Family Court,Muvattupuzha. It would cause severe inconvenience to the wife to travel all the way from Changassery to Muvttupuzha, to contest the above two proceedings. Hence, the cases may be transferred to the Family Court, Ettumanoor, so that the two cases can be jointly tried with O.P. No.1374/2022. ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 5 ``` 4. The respondent-husband has filed Tr.P. (C)No.654/2022, inter alia, contending that since he has already filed two cases before the Family Court, Muvattupuzha, it would be convenient that O.P.No.1374/2022 is transferred from the Family Court, Ettumanoor to the Family Court, Muvattupuzha. 5. Heard; Sri.M.M.Laiju Nissa, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-wife and Sri.Biju Abrham, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent- husband. 6. The law with respect to transfer of proceedings, particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res-integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in **Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and another** [2002 KHC 1889], **Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh Satya Goel** [2000 KHC 1835], **Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap** [2016 KHC 6489], **Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh** [2017 (5) KHC 48] and ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 6 ``` **N.C.V Aishwarya vs. A.S Saravana Karthik Sha** [2022 (5) KHC 182]. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that it is the convenience of the woman and children that has to be looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another. 7. In the light of the law laid down in the afore-cited decisions, the pleadings and materials on record, the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the petitioner is a young lady and she has already instituted O.P.No.1374/2022 and MC 74/2021 before the two courts in Kottayam District and the respondent is contesting both the proceedings before the said courts, I am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and order the transfer of O.P. Nos.142/2021 and 292/2022 from the Family Court, Muvattupuzha to the Family Court, Ettumannoor, so that all the cases between the parties can be consolidated and jointly tried, which ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 7 ``` would save precious judicial time and avoid conflict of decisions. Resultantly, I dispose of the transfer petitions in the following manner:: (i) Tr.P.(C) No.654/2022 is dismissed. (ii) Tr.P. (C ) No.42/2023 is allowed by ordering the withdrawal and transfer of O.P. Nos.142/2021 and 292/2022 from the Family Court, Muvattupuzha to the Family Court, Ettumanoor. (ii) The parties would be at liberty to move the Family Court, Ettumanoor and seek for the consolidation and joint trial of all the cases between them. (iii) The Registry shall forward a copy of this common order to the Family Court, Muvattupuzha, with instructions to forthwith transmit the records in O.P. Nos.142/2021 and 292/2022 to the Family Court, Ettumanoor. ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 8 ``` (iv) The Family Court, Ettumanoor, shall, immediately on receipt of the records in O.P. Nos.142/2021 and 292/2022, post the cases along O.P. No.1374/2022. ma/24.2.2023 Sd/- **C.S.DIAS, JUDGE** ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 9 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 654/2022`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 ``` ``` A TRUE COPY OF THE O.P. NO. 1374/2022 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANOOR ``` ``` TR.P(C) Nos. 42/2023 & 654/2022 ``` ``` 10 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 42/2023`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure ACOPY OF THE O. P. 142 OF 21 AT FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA Annexure BCOPY OF THE O. P. 292 OF 22 AT FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA Annexure CCOPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 05-01-2023 IN THE TR. P. (C). 654 OF 2022 ```