High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of. No order as to costs.

Manikandan v. Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-02-05
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.117/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment, and incorporating the Government Order G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD as part of the guiding framework. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of. No order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • MANIKANDAN, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.GOPALAN, KAKKAMADA HOUSE, MATHUR, MATHUR-I VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.

Respondents

  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD - 679 104.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • GOVERNMENT PLEADER (SMT VIDHYA A.C)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges inaction by the Special Tahsildar (LR) and seeks a mandamus to compel him to consider and pass orders in S.M. No.117/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi. The suo motu proceedings were initiated under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The land involved is 0.0425 hectares in Re.Sy.No.683/8, Block 13, Mathur-I Village, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad. The petitioner argues for expeditious disposal, emphasizing the Bank’s needs and the public interest in timely certificates of purchase. The Court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and others (2018), which laid down directions for expeditious disposal, prioritizing senior citizens, following seniority, and obtaining necessary reports through Village Officers when required, with defined outer time limits. Despite a large pendency (over 11,000 matters), the Court directs the Land Tribunal to proceed in accordance with those guidelines and to dispose of S.M.117/2020 within the framework of law. The Government order G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 forms part of the guiding framework. The petition is disposed of with no costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (dated 22.02.2018)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for expeditious disposal by the Land Tribunal of S.M.117/2020 and issuance of orders under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, emphasizing timely action for obtaining a purchase certificate and title/interest transfer, citing the public interest and necessity of prompt government action.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent government pleader notes the substantial pendency of suo motu proceedings (over 11,000) and urges adherence to the established process, including seniority-based disposal, use of Village Officers to obtain required reports, and compliance with the directions laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri; the Government order GO 2018 is to be treated as part of the judgment’s guidance.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveJudgment cited as controlling authority establishing expeditious disposal guidelines and seniority-based disposal framework for Land Tribunals.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Manikandan v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 16TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **MANIKANDAN, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.GOPALAN, KAKKAMADA HOUSE, MATHUR, MATHUR-I VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD - 679 104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT VIDHYA A.C- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.117/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0425 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.683/8 in Block No.13 of Mathur-I Village of Alathur Taluk in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the W.P(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y) -4- jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the W.P(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y) -5- cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending ## W.P(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y) -6- before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Mathur-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.117/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 29.01.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. W.P(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y) -7- 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.117/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.117/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2998 OF 2021(Y) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 29/01/2020.**