High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions as stated above.

M. D. Dhanesh and Bindu Dhanesh v Muthoot Vehicle & Asset Finance and Its Authorized Officer, Muthoot Vehicle & Asset Finance, Corporate Office; Binoy Varghese George; Shiji Binoy Varghese

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.39564 OF 2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Murali Purushothaman J.
Judgment Date
2023-02-01
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition was disposed of with directions permitting the outstanding amount of Rs. 1,31,25,000 to be paid in two installments: Rs. 40 lakhs on or before 25.02.2023 and the balance with interest on or before 25.03.2023. If the petitioners failed to pay the first installment, the secured assets may be surrendered. All coercive proceedings were deferred. The court also left open the possibility for the petitioners to approach the bank for a waiver of interest, which the bank may consider.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions as stated above.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • M.D. Dhanesh
  • Bindu Dhanesh

Respondents

  • Muthoot Vehicle & Asset Finance
  • The Authorized Officer, Muthoot Vehicle & Asset Finance
  • Binoy Varghese George
  • Shiji Binoy Varghese

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • S. Vinod Bhat
  • • Anagha Lakshmy Raman
  • • Greeshma Chandrika R.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sabu S. Kallaramoola
  • • George Mathew Karamayil
  • • M. D. Sasikumaran
  • • Sunil Kumar A.G
  • • Dipu James
  • • Mathew K.T.
  • • George K.V.
  • • Stephy K. Regi
  • • Adarsh Kurian

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a Kerala High Court writ petition (WP(C) No. 39564 of 2022) challenging a possession certificate issued under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioners previously approached this Court in W.P.(C) No. 22453 of 2021, and the Court, by Ext. P1 judgment, issued directions requiring the petitioners to deposit Rs. 52,40,000 by 25.02.2022 and to pay the remaining outstanding amount with interest in 12 equal monthly installments, commencing March 2022; it was also directed that any discrepancies in the settlement would be considered without affecting the installments and that coercive proceedings would stand deferred. The petitioners later remitted six monthly installments but defaulted thereafter. An interim stay of coercive proceedings was granted on condition of a Rs. 20 lakh deposit by 31.12.2022, and the matter returned on 03.01.2023 and again on 31.01.2023 with a proposal to clear the outstanding loan amount of Rs. 1,31,25,000 in two installments. The 1st respondent Bank proposed that Rs. 50 lakh be paid by 25.02.2023 and the balance by 25.03.2023; the petitioners and guarantors urged payment in two installments instead (Rs. 40 lakh by 25.02.2023 and the balance by 25.03.2023). After hearing, the Court directed approval of the two-installment plan: Rs. 40 lakh by 25.02.2023 and the balance with interest by 25.03.2023, with a potential waiver of interest if approached by the petitioners; coercive proceedings were deferred and the petition disposed of accordingly.

Provisions of Law Cited

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners sought extension to repay the outstanding amount with interest, in two installments (as refined during the proceedings) and subsequently argued for restructuring of payment terms while contending that coercive actions should remain deferred; they proposed to pay Rs. 1,31,25,000 in two installments (Rs. 40 lakhs by 25.02.2023 and the balance by 25.03.2023) and to consider waiver of interest upon request to the bank.

Contentions of Respondents

The bank advocated adherence to the revised schedule and insisted on the original time-bound installments, with specific dates (Rs. 50 lakhs by 25.02.2023 and the balance by 25.03.2023) and argued for protection of its security while allowing possible negotiations on waivers of interest; the guarantors supported a two-installment arrangement.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
W.P.(C) No.22453/2021, High Court of KeralaExt.P1PositiveEarlier judgment in W.P.(C) No.22453/2021 laid down the directions subsequently cited and followed by the current Court.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against M. D. Dhanesh and Bindu Dhanesh v Muthoot Vehicle & Asset Finance and Its Authorized Officer, Muthoot Vehicle & Asset Finance, Corporate Office; Binoy Varghese George; Shiji Binoy Varghese and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1[ST] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023/12TH MAGHA, 1944** **WP(C) NO. 39564 OF 2022** ## **PETITIONERS:** **1 M.D.DHANESH AGED 59 YEARS SON OF M.K. DAMODHARAN, METHANATH HOUSE, K. MURALI ROAD, KADAVANTHARA P. O., ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 020. 2 BINDU DHANESH AGED 53 YEARS WIFE OF DHANESH M.D., METHANATH HOUSE, K. MURALI ROAD, KADAVANTHARA P.O., ERNAKULAM. PIN – 682 020.** **BY ADVS. S.VINOD BHAT ANAGHA LAKSHMY RAMAN GREESHMA CHANDRIKA.R** ## **RESPONDENTS:** **1 MUTHOOT VEHICLE & ASSET FINANCE REGISTERED OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, MUTHOOT CHAMBERS, OPPOSITE SARITHA THEATRE, BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM – 682 018, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. 2 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER MUTHOOT VEHICLE & ASSET FINANCE, CORPORATE OFFICE, 5TH & 6TH FLOOR, MITHUN TOWER, K.P.VALLON ROAD, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 020. 3 BINOY VARGHESE GEORGE S/O. GEEVARGHESE GEORGE, DAIVAPURACKAL HOUSE, CHEPPAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT – 690 507.** **WP(C).No.39564 OF 2022** **2** **4 SHIJI BINOY VARGHESE W/O. BINOY VARGHESE GEORGE, DAIVAPURACKAL HOUSE, CHEPPAD P.O. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN – 690 507.** **BY ADVS. R1 & R2 – SRI. SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA SRI. GEORGE MATHEW KARAMAYIL SRI. M.D.SASIKUMARAN SRI. SUNIL KUMAR A.G SRI. DIPU JAMES SRI. MATHEW K.T. SRI. GEORGE K.V. SRI. STEPHY K. REGI SRI. ADARSH KURIAN** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** **WP(C).No.39564 OF 2022** **3** ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioners had earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.22453 of 2021 challenging possession certificate issued by the 2[nd] respondent under the SARFAESI Act. This Court by Ext.P1 judgment issued the following directions:- “i. The petitioners shall deposit an amount of Rs.52,40,000/- with the 1[st] respondent Bank on or before 25.02.2022. ii. The balance outstanding amount with interest shall be paid in 12 equal monthly installments commencing from March, 2022, payable on or before 25[th] of every month. iii. In case the petitioners fail to make payment of any of the installments as aforesaid, the respondents will be free to proceed against the secured assets of the petitioners, in accordance with law. iv. In case the petitioners point out any discrepancy with regard to the settlement of accounts, the respondents shall consider the same and give the petitioners appropriate reply. However, I make it clear that the same will not affect the payment of installments directed to be made as aforesaid. v. To enable the petitioners to make payments as aforesaid, all coercive proceedings shall stand deferred.” **WP(C).No.39564 OF 2022** **4** 2. Pursuant to the directions in the said judgment, the petitioners remitted six monthly installments. Thereafter, they did not pay the amounts. They have filed this writ petition for direction to respondents 1 and 2 to give them time to repay the balance amount with interest in six equal monthly installments. 3. When the matter came up for admission, this Court passed an interim order staying coercive proceedings against the petitioners on condition that the petitioners deposit an amount of Rs.20 lakhs on or before 31.12.2022 and posted the matter on 03.01.2023. 4. On 03.01.2023, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners could not deposit the amount of Rs.20 lakhs as directed by this Court and sought further time. 5. On 30.01.2023, the learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4, the guarantors, submitted that **WP(C).No.39564 OF 2022** **5** they have deposited an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- with the Bank on 27.01.2023. 6. When the matter was taken up for consideration on 31.01.2023, the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 submitted that the amount of Rs.1,31,25,000/- outstanding in the loan account will be paid in two installments and accordingly the writ petition was posted today for the instructions of the learned Standing Counsel for the 1[st] respondent. 7. The learned Standing Counsel for the 1[st] respondent submitted that the original time granted would expire on 25.02.2023 and an amount of Rs.50 lakhs shall be remitted by the petitioners on or before the said date and the balance amount shall be remitted on or before 25.03.2023. 8. The learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 pray that the petitioners/respondents 3 and 4 may be permitted to **WP(C).No.39564 OF 2022** **6** pay the outstanding amount in two installments and an amount of Rs.40 lakhs will be remitted by them towards 1[st] installment on or before 25.02.2023 and the balance amount will be remitted on or before 25.03.2023. 9. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 and the learned Standing Counsel for the Bank, I am of the view that, interest of justice would be met, if the petitioners/respondents 3 and 4 are permitted to pay the amount of Rs.1,31,25,000/- outstanding in the loan account in two installments as follows:- i) The petitioners/respondents 3 and 4 shall deposit an amount of Rs.40 lakhs with the 1st respondent Bank on or before 25.02.2023. The balance amount with interest shall be paid on or before 25.03.2023. ii) In case the petitioners fail to make payment of the first installment as aforesaid, the respondents 3 and 4 shall surrender the secured **WP(C).No.39564 OF 2022** **7** assets before the 1[st] respondent Bank. 10. To enable the petitioners to make payments as aforesaid, all coercive proceedings shall stand deferred. It will be open for the petitioners to approach the 1[st] respondent with request for waiver of interest, in which event, the 1[st] respondent Bank may consider such request and pass appropriate orders. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. ## **Sd/-** **MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE** SPR **WP(C).No.39564 OF 2022** **8** ## **APPENDIX** **' - PETITIONER S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23-12-2021 IN W.P.(C) NO.22453/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA.** ## **RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.**