High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with compromise; common award incor...

Lilly Pushpam alias Asha v. Sunil Kumar Fenn & Others (MACA Nos. 524/2007 & 559/2007), High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam

Case / Petition Number:MACA Nos. 524/2007 and 559/2007

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • T. V. Anilkumar
Judgment Date
2021-02-17
Court Decision / Holding
Appeals disposed of by passing a common award accepting the terms and conditions in the Memorandum of Agreement; the terms shall form part of the award; all pending interlocutory applications stand closed.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with compromise; common award incorporating MOA terms; IOA closed for all related matters.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Lilly Pushpam alias Asha

Respondents

  • Sunil Kumar Fenn and Others
  • United India Insurance Company Ltd.
  • G T B U Abraham Josepi
  • Kunnankuzhy P. O.
  • The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
  • Peer Mohammed
  • M. Santosh
  • New India Assurance Company Ltd.
  • Jayakumar (D/o Omana)
  • Athishai (D/o)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. G. P. Shinod

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Adv. P. V. Jyothi Prasad
  • • Adv. (others not clearly identifiable in the text)

Case Synopsis & Summary

These are two Motor Accidents Claims Appeals before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, arising from awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram, in OP Nos. 68/2002 and 424/2001. The appellant Lilly Pushpam alias Asha, claiming to be the wife of the deceased Sreekumar, sought enhancement of compensation. The respondents include the deceased’s siblings and insurers, notably United India Insurance Company Ltd., New India Assurance Company Ltd., and The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., among others. The matter was referred to the Ernakulam Mediation Centre, where the disputes were settled by a Memorandum of Agreement under Section 89 CPC read with Rules 24 and 25 of the Civil Procedure (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Rules, 2008. The MOA records that all disputes between the appellant and respondents 6–9 in MACA 559/2007 and the issues in MACA 524/2007 have been amicably settled; the parties waive further claims and agree to apportion the compensation, with a specified share noted in the document (one-fifth is referenced). On 17 February 2021 the High Court accepted the compromise, disposed of the appeals by a common award incorporating the MOA terms, and closed all pending interlocutory applications.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908Rules 24 & 25 of the Civil Procedure (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Rules, 2008

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

There are no detailed merits-based submissions recorded in the provided text; the matter is presented as a dispute resolved through mediation and settlement. The judgment highlights that the compromise was voluntary and recorded in a Memorandum of Agreement under Section 89 CPC read with ADR Rules.

Contentions of Respondents

Similarly, the respondent-side position appears in the mediation record, with assent to settlement and the MOA terms; no further merits appeal content is described beyond the mediation-based resolution.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Lilly Pushpam alias Asha v. Sunil Kumar Fenn & Others (MACA Nos. 524/2007 & 559/2007), High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# Iti[ THE EIGE COT'RT OF KERAI.A AT ER}IAKIILAII ## PRESENT THE HONOT'RJABLE MR. JI'STICE T.V.ATiIILKUIITAR > WSDNESDAY, THE 17TIt DAy OE' FEBRUARY 202]- / 28TH !{AGHA,L942 I{ACA. No . 524 OF 2007 AGATNST THE AWARD DATED 31-01-2006 rN O.p. (!{rr)NO.68/2002 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAI}'S TRIBT'TiIAL,TIIIRT'VAIIAIITEAPI'RAII ## AP PELI.AI{T,/AP PL I CAIIT : LILLY PUSHAPA!{ G ASIIA, w/o. r,ATE. v. SREEKIIIAR, vADAyrL VEEDU, K.p.-rrr/LL1, BEACH[p.O.,] TH I RWANATiITHAPT'RJAM . BY ADV. SRI.G.P.SHINOD ## RESPONDENTS/RES PONDENTS : - 1 SUNIT KT'MAR FEIIN, IIAr{AGING PARTNER, M/S. GATEWAY SYSTEM, TC-LL / 18L , VAyAr, ROAD , PLAI{OODU , PATTOM, T H I RWANATiITHAPT'RJAM . - T'NITED INDIA INST'RA}ICE COMPA}IY LTD. , DIVISIONAI, OFE.ICE NO. III, MAI,A}IKARJA BUILDINGS, PALAYA!{, THIRWAIiIATITHAPURjN'! . - GTBU ABRAHAM JOSEPII, TC-21 / 549, Ar{DOOR, TIIAI{PURjAI{MUKKU, VATiTCHIYOOR, - KT'NNT'KUZHY P. O. , TH I RWAI{AIiITHAPT,RJAII'. 37 . - 4 THE ORIENTAL INSI'RJA}ICE COMPAI{Y LTD. , RAMAKRISHNA BUILDINGS, ARTSTO .][,NCTTON, TIIAI{PATiIOOR, T H I RWA}IATTT HAPURJN'I . - q PEERU MOHAMMED, TC-35 /L245, P. D.NAGAR, VALLAKKADAW P.O., THI RT'VAIiINiITHAPT'RAII- 8 . - 6 M. SAI{THOSH, S/O. MURT'KAbI, - tc-32/ 680, PUTHI'VAT COLONY, > lv.A.c.A.Nos .524 & 559/2007 VETTUKAD, TH I RTTAilTAIiITHAPI'RA}I . THE !!AI[AGER, NEW INDT.E INSTJRA}ICE COMPA}IY BRAIICH-r, TC-26/L436, @VERNMENT PRESS ROJAD, TH I RT'VA}IANTIIAPT'R;AM . R4 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE CHERIATiI THIRT'VAII.A THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CI,AIMS APPEJAL HAVING BEEN FINALTY HEjARD ON L7.02.202L, ALONG WITH M.A.C.A.NO.559/2OO7, rHE COT'RT ON THE SA!{E DAY DELIVERED THE TOLLOWING: M.A.c.A.Nos. 524 & 559/2007 IN THE HIGH COttRT OF KERjALA AT ERNAKITT.A!,! ## PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JI'STICE T.V.AT.{IILKUMAR > WEDNESDAY, TIIE 17TH DAy OF FEBRUARY 2O2L / 28TH ![AGHA,L942 MACA.No.559 OF 2007 > AGATNST THE ALARD DATED 31-01-2006 rN O.p.(!nr)NO.424/200L OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CI,AIMS TRIBUNAT, THIRTryA}IA}ITI'API'R.A}I ## APPELI.AIIT: LILLY PUSHPA!{ G ASHA, W/O LATE V.SREEKT'!{AR, VADAYIL VEEDU, K.P-rrr/L[1 r BE.LCH F.O., THIRWANANTHAPURAII'. BY ADV. SRT.G.P.SHINOD ## RES PONDENTS /RES PONDENTS AIiID APPLICATiITS : - 1 SUNIL KUMAR E:ENN A}ID OTHERS, M/S. GATEWAY SYSTEM, T .C-LL/7SL , VAYAL ROAD, Pr,eMooDU , PAtroM, TH I RWA}IAIITHAPT'RAIT . I'NITED INDIA INST'RJA}ICE COMPATiIY LTD. DIVISIONAI OFFICE NO. III, MATATiIKARJA BUII,DINGS, V. iT. T . IIAIL ROJAD, PAI,AYAM / T H I RTryAI{A}IT HAPI'R;AII . PEERU MOIIAI{MED, T. C. 35/L245 , P. D . NAGAR VAII.AKKADAW P. O. THIRIryA}IAI{TIIAPI'RAM- 8 . > 4 M. SA!{THOSH KEERr, S/O MT'RT'KA}I ASSARI, G. G. NII,AYAI{, T.C 32/680, PUTHWAIJ COLONY, VETTUKAD, , > M.A.c.A.Nos .524 & 559/2007 -:4: - ## TH I RWANAN TIIAPT'RJA!{ . - MS.NEW INDIA ASST'RJAIICE COMPAIiIY LTD. DrvrsroNAt oFFrcE, KOTTARATHTL BUTLDINGS .AIINEXE, PAI,AYA!{, TH T RUVA}IA}IT IIAPURJAM . JAYAKUMART, D/O OMAlrA, SIVAPADOM, KAII,AS I,A}IE, KttDAPParmKXUmVu P. O, T H I RWAI{AIiITIIAPT'RJAII . - ATiIITHAI(I'IIARI D/O O!{A!{A, , POOVATHOOR HOUSE, r.c.3L/620, S.N.NAGAR, PETTAIT P.O. , - TH T RWAIiIA}IT IIAPT'RAII . - AI{IL KU!!AR, S/O I;ATE VASU, A!{EESH BHAVAI{, K. P. rrr/232 , KARIKKAKOM, BE.ACH P.O., TIT TRWAIVAT.{ITIIAPT'R.;AII'- 7 . > 9 SREEKAT.A, D/O OMAIiIA, RESIDING AT DO. DO. R2 BY ADV. SRI . P.V. JYOTHI PRASAD R6, 7 & 8 BY ADV. SRI.NAGARJA\' NARJAYATiIA}I R5 BY ADV. SRI.RENIL A}ITO KATiIDA!{KI'IATHY R1 BY ADVS. SRI. SAIiIO ITASSA}I SRI.A. S. SABU THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CI,AIMS APPEJAL HAVING BEEN FINALTY HE.ARD ON L1 .02.202L, AroNG WrrH !'ACA.52A/2O07 , MACA.524/2007 (B) , THE COLRT ON THE SAME DAy DELTVERED THE FOLLOWING: N4.A.c.A.Nos .524 & 559/2007 -.' 5: - Dated this the 17th day of February,202l ## JUDGMENT > oi sputes between parti es i n these appeal s were settled at Ernakulam Medi ation centre > attached to tti gh Cou rt of Ke ral a . rhe te rms and conditions as to the compromise have been reduced to wri ti ng i n the form of Memorandum of Agreerfieflt under Section 89 of the Code of Civil[procedure] read wi th Rul es 24 & 25 of the Ci vi 1 Procedu re (al ternati ve o'i spute Resol uti on) , Rul es , 2008 . > 2. I heard the I ear"ned counsel for" the parti es on either side. 3. r am sati sfi ed that compromi se entered i nto by parti es i s vol untary. rhe terms and conditions in the Memorandum of Agreement are recorded. Parti es rel i nqu'i shed thei r cl ai m for enhancement of compensation and agreed to apportion the amount payable under the award in terms of what has been reduced to writing. 4. rn the resul t , these appea'l s are di sposed of by passi ng a common award accepti ng the terms and conditions in the Memorandum of Agreement. rhe > M.A.c.A.Nos .524 & 559/2007 -:6: - terms and conditions in the Memorandum of Agreement would form part of the award. Al I pend-i ng i nte r'l ocuto ry appl i cati ons wi I I stand closed. sd/_ T.V.ANILKUMAR, JUDGE DST / /true[copy/] P.A.To rudge j\ i : I ## ERNAKULAM N'IEDIATION CENTRE ## (H[GH COURT I{ALL} (2no[floor, above SBl, High Court Building, Emakulam, ] Kodri-31.(ph:04U2S62Z3gl /2,, Dated: ,*r/Z The NdalOfficer, > Emakulam Mediation Cenfe (H.C.), Emakulam. To The Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Kerala, Emakulam. Sir, Ref:- Sub:- Mediation Referral orderin..H.A of refened cases - Reg.. - ssz/* c./ aatea... . . . . //. .7. ..rt the Hon, bte High Cou rt of Kerata. {/4 l (* r,[0to] c A1-\,, The report of the Mediator in the **r. d*n with fre enclosures is fumished herewith for information and necessary action. Ernakulam Mediation Centre Encl:- 1. Report of the Mediator, Settlement Agreement. lt 2. copy of refenat order dated 5/u//3... of the High courtof Kerata. 3. Copy of Petition. # BEFORE[THE ][HONOURABLE ][HIGH ][COURT ][OF] KERALA AT ERNAKULAM # M.A.C.A. No,55912007 Lilly PushPam[Alias ][Asha] ': ## Appellant Vs. Sunil Kumar[Fenn ][and ][others] # Respondents # REPORT SUBMITTED[BY ][THE ][MEDIATOR] ADV. CHINCY[GOPAKUMAR] matter[is ][settled'] Mediated., Terms and conditions[are ][attached ][herewith'] Dated this the 4ay "/[of ][November' ][2019'] t Adv. ChincY[GoPakumar] Med iator Ernakulam[Mediation ][Centre] I ## BEFORE THE HONOURABLE[HIGH ][OF ][KERALA ][AT] ERNAKULAM MACA 5s912007 Lilly Pushpam Alias Asha : Appellant Vs. Sunil Kumar Fenn & Others : Respondents MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT[UNDER ][SECTION 89 ][OF ][THE] CODE OF CIVI PROCEDURE READ[WITH ][RULES ][24 ][&25 ][OF ][THE] crvrl PROCEDURE (ALTERNATM[DISPUTE ][RESOLUTION),] RULES,2OOS: 1. The appellant in MACA :559/07 and[MACA:524/2007 ][is ][the] person claiming to be the wife of the[deceased Sreekumar, ][who] died from the injuries sustained in the[motor ][accident. ][The ][party] respondents are the siblings of the[aforesaid Sreekumar.] - Both the aforementioned MACAs were[filed by ][Lilly ][Pushparn ][@] Asha, seeking the entitlement of compensation[awarded ][by ][the] motor accident claims Tribunal,[Thiruvanathapuram ][to ][her.] g- 3. The appellant - namely, Lilly Pushpam[@ ] Asha[and ][the contesting] respondents (R6 to R9 in MACA 559/200n and their[counsel,] presented themselves before the Nodal Officer Emakulam, Mediation Centre, High Court of Kerala on1'4.1'l'.20L9[and resolved] settle that disputes on the following terms and conditions. ,,""*,o ,.<ut'.[a. ][The parties ][agree ][and ][affirm ][that the ][compensation awarded ][or] the enhanced compensation liable to be determined /'and *.*loler* "":R adjudicated by this honourable court shall be apportioned in ag""^."";i such a manner that the appellant and the contesting respondents No.6,7,8 &.9 in MACA559/20017 shall be entitled to 1/5th odr'+='+" *s* fftn s nonouraple **l** ;r":ff[i:il:ensationawar]ed courr. ,[/ ][tobe@ot] r'; .\\\4, t#'[,ff:i_ p"r' ( -'*ff; . ;itt0l.*rr* \ ffi; ;ffitr'd- / - Thepartiesdeclarethatallsubdistingdisputesbetweenthe appeiant[and ][respondents ][6 ][to ][9 ][in ][MACA ][559 ][/2007.and ][MACA] s[q/zooz[have been settled ][amicably ][and ][that they ][shall ][not ][raise] any claims[in future ][as ][between ][them'] - c. Theterms&conditionsofthisagreementshallbebindingon MACA524/200Tonapparentandconductingrespondents6to9 inMACAssg/2007andMACA524/200Tandthetermsand conditionsshallbebindingandapplicabletotheabovesaid with[respect ][to the ][issues ][in ][MACA ][524/2007 ][is ][also'] - parties - d'Thiscompromiseisvalidonlyfortheissuesbetween.the appellant and[the respondents ][6 ][to ][9 ][in MAC ][A559/2007 ][and the] issues between[the ][same ][parties ][inMACA ][524/2007'] - e. This comPromise APPALANT[:] LILLY PUSHPAM[@ ][A] LIYAS[V] ASHA **==> picture [454 x 243] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> @"1,,\lo_ RESPONDANTS:<br>ADVACATE [FOR ] [APPELANT:] t /<br>AJIT G. ANJARLEKAR 1. JAYAKUMARI J*T',','--<br>2. ANITHAKUMARI ,At"\C<br>3. ANILKUMAR<br>ft!$h--<br>4. JAYAKUM [RT ] ffi |_-j_-__<br>(Power of Attorney [Holder ][6f ][Sr&kala)]<br>S*r.To l+rr<sD^/<br>,rd<br>*'t*:"""<br>a\,<br>A,f^t oL^h W [B'-sfo'd,.F- ] [6 ][t"1]<br>50\"<br>lh. lt.br9<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> *---:*-*% **==> picture [222 x 33] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> ...'<br>.<br>. ,./ [r - :;;'*' ] ["- ][' ] :r,ul8t*tii...,i.&;.ilii;.,.. : liqis4tu,i{"g [qr{x$6qrd;;]<br>I :' 'rl'r ;<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>