High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeAllowed

Laiju C.C v. Union of India and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Devan Ramachandran
Judgment Date
2023-12-22
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition allowed. The Local Level Committee for Renal Transplantation cannot insist on a Photo Identification Certificate from the near relative of the donor. The petitioner’s application will be forwarded to the DLAC (excluding Certificate of Altruism) within one week; the DLAC will determine within two weeks whether a Certificate of Altruism is required; if not, the process to grant necessary permissions shall be completed within one month; if required, the petitioner must obtain it and present it; final decision to be made within one month thereafter, without insisting on photo identification. The DLAC may examine all relevant aspects, including donor identity, but such examination shall not delay the process on photo ID grounds.
Final Disposition
Allowed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Laiju C.C

Respondents

  • Union of India represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi
  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • District Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human Organs Ernakulam, Ernakulam Medical College Hospital, Kalamassery represented by its Chairman
  • Local Level Committee for Renal Transplantation represented by its Chairman/Medical Director, Medical Trust Hospital, MG Road, Pallimukku, Ernakulam
  • Village Officer, Village Office, Eruveli Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • K. M. Firoz

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sunil K. Kuriakose, Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition challenges the Local Level Committee for Renal Transplantation’s insistence that a close relative donating a kidney must obtain a Photo Identification Certificate from the Village Officer as a precondition to processing a donor’s application. The petitioner contends that such a certificate is not mandated by statute and that Rule 7(3)(ix) of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014 only provides for an interview, not a requirement of identification. The matter centers on whether a near relative’s identity documentation is a statutory ingredient or an administrative hurdle. The court recalls its own prior ruling in Soubiya v. District Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human Organs, Ernakulam, 2023 (6) KHC 293, and signals that the issues have been answered therein. Having examined Rule 7(3)(ix) closely, the court agrees that the DLAC cannot compel a Photo Identification Certificate from a donor’s close relative. The court directs the fourth respondent to forward the petitioner’s application and documents (excluding the Certificate of Altruism) to the DLAC within one week, and requires the DLAC to determine within two weeks whether a Certificate of Altruism is required. If not required, the process should be completed within one month; if required, the petitioner must obtain it, and the final decision should follow within a further month, without insisting on photo identification. The order also clarifies DLAC’s duty to examine all relevant aspects while not using photo ID as a gatekeeping device. In short, the Court streamlines the process to avoid unnecessary documentary hurdles while preserving due diligence.

Provisions of Law Cited

Rule 7(3)(ix) of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner’s counsel argued that Rule 7(3)(ix) of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014 stipulates only an interview and does not require the close relative of a donor to obtain a Photo Identification Card. There is no statutory provision mandating such an identification; therefore the DLAC cannot insist on a Photo Identification Certificate from a near relative of the donor.

Contentions of Respondents

The Government Pleader stated that, apart from Rule 7(3)(ix), there are no other provisions governing identification requirements, suggesting no statutory basis for demanding a Photo Identification Certificate. The DLAC’s position, in the absence of contrary provisions, was argued as within the framework of the rules.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Soubiya v. District Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human Organs, Ernakulam2023 (6) KHC 293PositiveCourt relied on Soubiya to state that the issues had already been answered and to guide the current directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Laiju C.C v. Union of India and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 22[ND] DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 1ST POUSHA, 1945** ## **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** ## **PETITIONER:** **LAIJU C.C AGED 37 YEARS S/O. CHACKO C.P, CHILLIRICKAL HOUSE, KADUNGAMANGALAM POST, KANAYANNUR, ERNAKULAM -, PIN – 682305** ## **BY ADV K.M.FIROZ** ## **RESPONDENTS:** - **1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI -, PIN – 110011** - **2 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695001** - **3 THE DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORIZATION COMMITTEE FOR TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KALAMASSERY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN -, PIN – 683104** - **4 THE LOCAL LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR RENAL TRANSPLANTATION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN/MEDICAL DIRECTOR, MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL, MG ROAD, PALLIMUKKU, ERNAKULAM ,** **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** **-2-** ## **PIN – 682016** **5 VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, ERUVELI VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT -, PIN – 682312** **BY SRI. SUNIL K KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** **-3-** ## **JUDGMENT** When this matter was called today, the learned Government Pleader – Sri.Sunil Kumar Kuriakose and learned counsel for the petitioner – Sri. K.M.Firoz, were _ad idem_ that the issues involved in this case have already been answered by this Court in _**Soubiya v. District Level Authorisation**_ _**Committee for Transplantation of Human**_ _**Organs, Ernakulam [2023 (6) KHC 293].**_ They prayed that, therefore, this writ petition also be ordered in terms of the directions issued therein. 2. The only controversy remaining in this case is whether the close relative of the donor should also obtain an identification certificate, to be issued by the Village Officer. This issue has arisen ## **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** **-4-** because, it appears that the fourth respondent, Local Level Committee for Renal Transplantation, has insisted on the same; but the petitioner says that this is impossible to get because, the donor, though has a brother, his whereabouts are completely unknown. 3. Sri. K.M. Firoz, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that, as per Rule 7(3) (ix) of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014, only an interview is stipulated; and not that the near relative of the donor must obtain a Photo Identification Card. 4. Having examined the afore Rule closely, I am in affirmation with the afore argument of Sri. K. M. Firoz. 5. I, therefore, asked the learned ## **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** **-5-** Government Pleader, if the requirement of Photo Identification Card of a close relative of the donor, is a statutory ingredient, to which, his answer was, that apart from the aforementioned Rule, there are no other provisions. 6. It is luculent, therefore, that the DLAC cannot insist on a Photo Identification Certificate from a near relative of the donor, to be issued by the Village Officer. In the afore circumstances, I allow this writ petition with the following directions: a) The 4[th] respondent – Local Level Committee for Renal Transplantation of the Hospital concerned, will forward the application of the petitioner, along with all necessary documents, except ‘Certificate of Altruism’, to the 3[rd] respondent – District ## **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** **-6-** Level Authorization Committee for Renal Transplantation (DLAC); and this shall be done within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. b) On the afore application reaching the 3[rd] respondent - DLAC, its competent Authority will notify the petitioner and inform him whether he has to obtain a ‘Certificate of Altruism’ from the concerned Authority. c) If the DLAC is to find that no such Certificate is required in this case, they will complete the processes, leading to necessary permissions to be granted to the petitioner, within a period of one month thereafter. d) However, if, on the contrary, the DLAC is to find that ‘Certificate of Altruism’ is required to be obtained by the petitioner, ## **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** **-7-** they will intimate him of such within a period of two weeks from the date on which they receive application from the 4[th] respondent; upon which, the petitioner will be required to obtain the same and produce it before the said Authority, as per law. e) On the afore being done, the DLAC will take a final decision on the petitioner’s request, within a period of one month from the date on which such Certificate is produced, without insisting on the photo identification of the close relative of the donor. f) Needless to say, if the 3[rd] respondent calls upon the petitioner to obtain a ‘Certificate of Altruism’, the competent Authority, will act upon the application for such to be made before them; and will issue ## **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** **-8-** necessary certificate without any avoidable delay, but not later than two weeks from the date on which it is received by them, after making all necessary enquiries. I however clarify that the afore observations of this Court in direction No. (e) above, will not stand in the way of the DLAC examining every relevant and germane aspects including the identity of the donor and any relative, if available **Sd/-** ## **DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN** **JUDGE** DCS ## **WP(C) NO. 43864 OF 2023** **-9-** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER EXHIBITS** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ALTRUISM ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ HAVING NO. 4364/TD/2023/PZS DATED NIL** **EXHIBIT P2** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 05.12.2023 ISSUED BY SRI. ANOOP JACOB, MEMBER OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, PIRAVOM** **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OBTAINED FROM PRESIDENT, CHOTTANIKARA GRAMA PANACHYATH DATED 19.10.2023** **EXHIBIT P4** **A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM OF IDENTIFICATION CERTIFICATE INSISTED TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4**