High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions; no c...

LabeeB Kuttiamu v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Tirur

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-04-09
Court Decision / Holding
The petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.452/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued in paragraph 2 of Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions; no costs. The Land Tribunal is directed to dispose of S.M.No.452/2021 following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions and in accordance with law.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • LabeeB Kuttiamu

Respondents

  • Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur, Malappuram District – 679 101
  • Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur, Malappuram District – 679 101

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. U.K. Devidas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • A.C. Vidhya (Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, LabeeB Kuttiamu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to command the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.452/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Tirur, in respect of 4.86 acres of land in Ezhuvathiruthi Village (Re-Sy.No.265/2) Malappuram, under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The challenge arises from suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for assignment of the right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14. The court references Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and another (W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, judgment dated 14.03.2018) to emphasize queing and seniority principles, stating that tribunals should dispose cases in registration order and may obtain reports via Village Officers if Revenue Inspectors are unavailable. It, however, acknowledges the pendency and directs expeditious disposal in line with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions. The court notes the total pendency of suo motu proceedings (4987) and, while disposing of the petition, directs the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to proceed strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no costs order.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner petitioned for mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.452/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Tirur, in respect of the government-vested land under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. They relied on existing guidelines and the Narayanan Namboodiri decision, seeking expedited disposal in accordance with law and with the reports from Village Officers as an alternative to Revenue Inspector reports when there are shortages. They urged adherence to the seniority-based disposal within prescribed timelines and to ensure rapid resolution of pending matters through sui generis channels.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents supported following due process and the directives already laid down in law for expeditious disposal, highlighting the substantial pendency of suo motu proceedings (4,987) and the need to preserve seniority. They emphasized the Land Tribunal’s duty to operate within statutory time frames and the general guidelines from government orders and earlier judgments, while ensuring proper notices and compliance with the statutory provisions before final orders are passed.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No. 28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relies on this decision for expeditious disposal guidelines, seniority-based disposal, and acceptable use of Village Officers for reports to expedite cases.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against LabeeB Kuttiamu v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Tirur and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **LABEEB KUTTIAMU, AGED 35 YEARS S/O.KUTTIAMU, OTTAKATH CHATHUNTEKAIL, 'SAFA MANZIL', PURANG, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 LAND TRIBUNAL (LAND REFORMS), TIRUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 679 101 2 SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 679 101** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C VIDHYA- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.452/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 04.86 Ares of land comprised in Re-Sy.No.265/2 of Ezhuvathiruthi Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers ## W.P(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U) -6- directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Ezhuvathiruthi Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.452/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 certificate dated 02.03.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.452/2021 W.P(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U) -7- following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.452/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.9364 OF 2021(U) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:** **EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 02.03.2021 IN S.M.NO.452/2021 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.**