High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition dismissed as withdrawn

K.V Ravindran v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.701 of 2019

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2019-02-22
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition (Civ.) is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the petitioner’s right to challenge the 3.2.2019 election to the Managing Committee of Guruvayoor Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, by approaching the Co-operative Arbitration Court. The court also recorded that elections had already taken place and that the petition’s reliefs became infructuous.
Final Disposition
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • K.V Ravindran

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary to Department of Cooperation, Government of Kerala
  • Registrar of Co-operative Society, Thiruvananthapuram
  • Joint Registrar (General) of Co-operative Society, Thrissur
  • Assistant Registrar (General) Chavakkad, Thrissur District
  • State Co-operative Election Commission
  • Guruvayoor Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., Guruvayoor
  • The Managing Committee of Guruvayoor Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd.
  • Venugopal V.
  • Udayan K.P.
  • Aravinthakshan Nair
  • Sivadas M.S.
  • Shijitha C.S.
  • Yetheenthradas P.
  • Veeramani K.D.
  • Anto Thomas
  • Abubakkar R.A.
  • Vasu K.I.
  • Subaida
  • Sathar P.
  • Laila Majeed
  • The Part Term Administrator (the Guruvayoor Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. Aravind Unni

Counsels for Respondents

  • • D. Somasundaram
  • • George Poonthottam (Sr.)
  • • Nisha George
  • • Arjun Raghavan
  • • T.R. Harikumaran
  • • Mable C. Kurien
  • • Sr. Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, a member of the Guruvayoor Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., a society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct respondents 3 to 5 to conduct inquiry on Exts. P1 and P2 within a time limit and to remove ineligible members from the voters list, along with a directive to inquire into the bulk collection of bogus identity cards. The petition references allegations against the bank’s then Managing Committee whose tenure continued until a Part-time Administrator was appointed, as addressed in another writ petition. The court cites Prabodh Verma v. State of U.P. to emphasize the principle that a High Court should not decide a writ petition under Article 226 without affording representation to those vitally affected; if not joined, non-joinder may warrant dismissal. Subsequently, the court allowed impleading the Managing Committee members and the Part-time Administrator as additional respondents (Nos. 8–21) and issued notices. By 3.2.2019 the bank conducted elections, and counsel for the petitioner stated the reliefs were infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, reserving the petitioner’s right to challenge the election under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act (via the Co-operative Arbitration Court). The judgment was delivered by Hon’ble Justice Anil K. Narendran.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India, Article 226Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (and the rules made thereunder)Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Non-joinder of necessary parties (Prabodh Verma v. State of U.P., (1984) 4 SCC 251)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner urged a mandamus to compel the 3rd–5th respondents to conduct inquiry into Exts. P1 and P2 within the prescribed time and to remove ineligible members from the voters list, and to investigate bulk collection of bogus ID cards. He sought protection to ensure due process in light of alleged malpractices by the bank’s Managing Committee and connected entities, and sought impleadment of the bank’s administrators to enable proper scrutiny.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents’ detailed submissions are not fully recorded in the provided text. The record shows that the court noted the election on 3.2.2019 and ultimately found the reliefs infructuous, with the petition dismissed as withdrawn; but the respondents’ specific written arguments are not delineated in the excerpt.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Prabodh Verma v. State of U.P.(1984) 4 SCC 251PositiveCited as the guiding principle that a High Court should not entertain a writ petition under Article 226 without affording representation to those vitally affected; used to justify joinder and impleadment considerations.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against K.V Ravindran v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY ,THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1940** ## **WP(C).No. 701 of 2019** ## **PETITIONER:** **K.V RAVINDRAN AGED 54 YEARS S/O K.P. VASU, (MEMBERSHIP NO.34991 OF THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISUSR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT KURUMBOOR HOUSE, ORUMANAYOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 512.** ## **BY ADV. SRI.ARAVIND UNNI** ## **RESPONDENTS:** - **1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM-695 001** - **2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR, TRIVANDRUM-695 001.** - **3 JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001.** - **4 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) CHAVAKKAD THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 058.** - **5 THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION 3RD FLOOR, CO-BANK TOWERS, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.** - **6 THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680022, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.** ## **W.P.(C)No.701 of 2019** ## **:-2-:** - **7 THE MANAGING COMMITTEE** **THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680022, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.** - **ADDL.8 VENUGOPAL V.** **AGED 62, MEMBERSHIP NO.9396 OF THE GURUVAYOOR COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT KODAMANA HOUSE, THIRUVENGIDAM, GURUVAYOOR P O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680101.** ## **ADDL9 UDHAYAN K.P.** - **AGED 40, MEMBERSHIP NO.32515 OF THE GURUVAYOOR COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, S/O.SARASWATHI AMMA, RESIDING AT KURUVANGATT PUTHANVEETIL, THIRUVENKIDAM, GURUVAYOOR P O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680101.** ## **ADDL10 ARAVINTHAKSHAN NAIR** - **AGED 52, MEMBERSHIP NO.9313 OF THE GURUVAYOOR COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT PALLATH HOUSE, MAMMIYOOR, GURUVAYOOR P O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680101.** - **ADDL11 SIVADAS M.S.** - **AGED 43, MEMBERSHIP NO.32292 OF THE GURUVAYOOR COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT MATHRAMKOTTU, THIRUVATHRA P.O., CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680516.** ## **ADDL12 SHIJITHA C.S.** - **AGED 32, MEMBERSHIP NO.40651 OF THE GURUVAYOOR COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT CHOZHIDAKATH HOUSE, THIRUVATHRA P.O., CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680516.** ## **ADDL13 YETHEENTHRADAS P.** **AGED 57 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.8041 OF THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, S/O.VELAYUDHAN P.R., RESIDING AT PONNARASSERI HOUSE, MANATHALAPUNNA, CHAVAKKAD P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680506.** ## **W.P.(C)No.701 of 2019** ## **:-3-:** ## **ADDL14 VEERAMANI K.D.** **AGED 50 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.31671 OF THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, S/O.DASAN, RESIDING AT KIZHAKKAKATH HOUSE, KADAPPURAM, BLANGAD P.O., CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680506.** ## **ADDL15 ANTO THOMAS** **AGED 45, MEMBERSHIP NO.30392 OF THE GURUVAYOOR COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT CHEERAN HOUSE, VAZHAPULLY, PERAKAM P.O., CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680506.** ## **ADDL16 ABUBAKKAR R.A.** **AGED 40 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.40650 OF THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT RAMANATH HOUSE, THAIKKAD P.O., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680104.** ## **ADDL17 VASU K.I.** **AGED 42 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.22562 OF THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, S/O.ITTIKORAN, RESIDING AT KUNDU HOUSE, ORUMANAYUR P O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680512.** ## **ADDL18 SUBAIDA** **AGED 45 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.12309 OF THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, W/O.ABDUL GAFOOR, RESIDING AT KANAPULLI HOUSE, MANATHALA, CHAVAKKAD P O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680506.** ## **ADDL19 SATHAR P.** **AGED 50 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.31867 OF THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, S/O.KUNJAVARASUKUTTY, RESIDING AT PUTHUVEETIL HOUSE, VAZHAPULLY, PERAKAM, CHAVAKKAD P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680506.** ## **W.P.(C)No.701 of 2019** **:-4-:** **ADDL20 LAILA MAJEED** **MEMBERSHIP NO.25843 OF THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, D/O.NAFEESA, RESIDING AT KANATTU HOUSE, MANATHALAPUNNA, CHAVAKKAD P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680506.** **ADDL21 THE PART TERM ADMINISTRATOR** **THE GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680101. (ADDL.RESPONDENTS NOS.8 TO 21 WERE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 23.01.2019 IN IA 1/19.)** **BY ADVS. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.) SMT.NISHA GEORGE SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR SRI.MABLE C.KURIEN, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** ## **W.P.(C)No.701 of 2019** ## **:-5-:** ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner, who is a member of the 6th respondent Bank, which is a Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, and the rules made thereunder, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 3 to 5 to conduct an inquiry within the prescribed time limit on Exts.P1 and P2 complaints; and a writ of mandamus commanding the 5th respondent to remove the ineligible members from the voters list and conduct an inquiry on the bulk collection of bogus ID cards. 2. On 15.1.2019 when this writ petition came up for admission, this Court passed the following order; “The petitioner, who is a member of the 6[th] respondent Bank, which is a Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and the Rules made thereunder, has filed this ## **W.P.(C)No.701 of 2019** ## **:-6-:** writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 3 to 5 to conduct enquiry on Exts.P1 and P2 complaints, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The further relief sought for is a writ of mandamus commanding the 5[th] respondent to remove ineligible members from the voters list and to conduct an enquiry on the bulk collection of bogus identity cards. 2. In the writ petition, allegations are made against the members of the Managing Committee holding office till a Part-time Administrator has been appointed, in terms of the order of this Court, in another writ petition. 3. In **Prabodh Verma v. State of U.P. [(1984) 4 SCC 251]** a Three-Judge Bench of the Apex Court held that a High Court ought not to hear and dispose of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution without the persons who would be vitally affected by its judgment being before it as respondents or at least some of them before it as respondents in a representative capacity, if their number is too large to join them as respondents individually, and, if the petitioners refuse to so join them the High Court ought to dismiss the petition for non-joinder of ## **W.P.(C)No.701 of 2019** ## **:-7-:** necessary parties. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file an application to implead the members of the 7[th] respondent Managing Committee against whom allegations are made. The learned counsel also seeks time to implead the Part-time Administrator. List on 23.01.2019.” 3. Thereafter, on 23.1.2019, when this writ petition came up for further consideration, this Court allowed I.A.No.1/2019 filed by the petitioner, seeking an order to implead the members of the Managing Committee and also the Part-time Administrator of the 6th respondent Bank as additional respondents 8 to 21. This Court has issued notice by special messenger to respondents 6 and 7 and also to additional respondents 8 to 20. 4. Today when the case is taken up for further consideration, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the election to the Managing Committee of the 6th ## **W.P.(C)No.701 of 2019** **:-8-:** respondent Bank has already been conducted on 3.2.2019 and the elected committee has already taken charge. As the reliefs sought for in this writ petition have become infructuous, this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise any dispute in connection with the election held on 3.2.2019 to the Managing Committee of the 6th respondent Bank, by invoking the statutory provisions under Section 69 of the Act, by approaching the Co-operative Arbitration Court. In such circumstances, recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the aforesaid right of the petitioner. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE** ami/