High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit Petition disposed with directions; Land Tr...

Kunjikkammu v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi at Ottappalam, Mini Civil Station, Ottappalam - 679 104; and The Special Village Officer Anakkara Village Office, Anakkara Post, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District - 679 551

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-05
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed of the writ petition by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M. No.81/2014 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and the associated judgment; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ Petition disposed with directions; Land Tribunal to follow Narayanan Namboodiri guidelines; no costs awarded.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Kunjikkammu, aged 89 years, S/o. Kunjumu Hammed, Chodath Kuzhiyil, Kudallur Post, Anakkara, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District - 679 554

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi at Ottapalam, Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam - 679 104
  • The Special Village Officer Anakkara Village Office, Anakkara Post, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District - 679 551

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. Sri R. Sreehari

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty, Sr. Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Kunjikkammu, an 89-year-old resident, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct the 1st respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to expeditiously conduct an enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.81/2014 before the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The land involved is 16.19 acres in Sy.No.235/7-2 of Anakkara. The petitioner contends urgency due to age and need for loan-related purchases; the respondents point to a large pendency and procedural constraints. The court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and others, noting the established guidelines for expeditious disposal prioritizing senior citizens and adherence to seniority, and the role of Village Officers in reporting to the Land Tribunal. It observes pendency figures and endorses GO (P) No. 09/2018/RD as part of the framework. Ultimately, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.81/2014 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963GO (P) No. 09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner submits that he, a senior citizen, seeks mandatory direction to the 1st respondent to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M.No.81/2014 before the Land Tribunal; he emphasizes the age factor, the long pendency, and the necessity of timely purchase under the Land Reforms regime. He relies on the need for expeditious disposal and prioritization of senior citizens as guided by prior case law (Narayanan Namboodiri).

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that the Land Tribunal is bound by the seniority principle and existing procedural framework; there is substantial pendency (2434 cases) and, while expeditious disposal is desirable, it must occur within the established guidelines and orders, including GO 09/2018/RD.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveThis judgment provides the framework and directions for expeditious disposal of senior-citizen cases and maintaining seniority, which the present court adopts.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Kunjikkammu v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi at Ottappalam, Mini Civil Station, Ottappalam - 679 104; and The Special Village Officer Anakkara Village Office, Anakkara Post, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District - 679 551 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 16TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **KUNJIKKAMMU, AGED 89 YEARS S/O.KUNJUMUHAMMED, CHODATH KUZHIYIL, KUDALLUR POST, ANAKKARA, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 554.** **BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEHARI** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), PATTAMBI AT OTTAPALAM, MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM - 679 104. 2 THE SPECIAL VILLAGE OFFICER ANAKKARA VILLAGE OFFICE, ANAKKARA POST, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 551.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY -SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.81/2014 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 16.19 Ares of land comprised in Sy.No.235/7-2 of Anakkara Village, Pattambi Taluk in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on W.P(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U) -5- account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for W.P(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U) -6- passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Anakkara, the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.81/2014, as evidenced by Ext.P3 notice dated 26.11.2016, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 89 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam is 2434. W.P(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.81/2014 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, to dispose of S.M. No.81/2014, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2967 OF 2021(U) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 PHOTO COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 27/01/2021.** **EXHIBIT P2 PHOTO COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 30/01/2021.** **EXHIBIT P3 PHOTO COPY OF THE NOTICE DT. 26/11/2016 FOR HEARING.** **EXHIBIT P4 PHOTO COPY OF AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER.** **EXHIBIT P5 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.28398/2017 ETC DATED 14/03/018 OF THIS COURT.** **EXHIBIT P6 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.1134/2021 DATED 18TH JAN. 2021 OF THIS COURT.**