High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition allowed; Ext.P3 to be implemented...

K.M.Kamarban v. State of Kerala & Others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No. 8847 of 2021

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • P. V. Kunhikrishnan
Judgment Date
2023-02-17
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is allowed. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are directed to ensure Ext.P3 is implemented in letter and spirit for as long as it remains in force, and to follow the principle laid down in Noorul Islam Samskarika Sangam’s case (supra) strictly.
Final Disposition
Writ petition allowed; Ext.P3 to be implemented; Noorul Islam Samskarika Sangam principle applied to require permission for occupancy changes to a religious use.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • K.M.KAMARBAN

Respondents

  • STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695001
  • THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673122
  • THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673122
  • THE SECRETARY, MUTTIL GRAMA PANCHAYATH,MUTTIL.P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT673122
  • THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, KALPETTA,WAYANAD DISTRICT-673121
  • C.M.ASSASSUL ISLAM SANGAM, PARIYARAM POST,WAYANAD,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT PRESIDENT,AHAMMED SHA,AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,URRUTTIYIL HOUSE,CHILANJICHAL,PARIYARAM POST, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673122
  • PUTHENKANDY ABOOBACKER, AGED 42 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PUTHUKKANDY HOUSE,PULLERI,PARIYARAM POST, CHELANJICHAL,WAYANAD,SECRETARY,C.M.ASSASSUL ISLAM SANGAM,PARIYARAM-673122
  • HAMID ANAS SAKHAFI, S/O ABDUL KHADER FAISY,ULLATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHELANJICHAL,PARIYARAM POST-673122
  • JUMAILTH, W/O HAMID ANAS SKHAFI,ULLATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHELANJICHAL,PARIYARAM POST-673122

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • CELINE JOSEPH

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT.JAYASREE K.P.
  • • MOHAMED JAMEEL
  • • P.K RAFFEEKH.K
  • • P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH

Case Synopsis & Summary

Petitioner K.M. Kamarban, a resident of Chilanjichal in Wayanad District, challenges the construction and subsequent religious use of a building adjacent to his property. Respondent 6 to 9 built a structure with a permit originally issued to erect a private hostel and home stay by the 4th respondent, Muttil Grama Panchayath. After completion, the builders allegedly began to use the building as a Mosque and Juma Masjid, installing loudspeakers and other religious facilities in contravention of building rules. The Panchayat conducted inspections and issued Exhibit P3 on 31 December 2020 directing cessation of the mosque activities. The petitioner contends that despite Ext.P3, the order has not been implemented and that the new occupancy and use violates the permit and building norms. The petitioner also filed representations and sought action on complaints (Exhibits P6-P8), and urged the court to restrain further regularization of the construction and to prevent the alleged Madrassa operations pending disposal of OA/OP 153/2020 before the Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions. The High Court cites Noorul Islam Samskarika Sangam v. District Collector, Malappuram (2022 (5) KHC 595) and holds that using a building under a permit for a different occupancy, particularly a religious use, requires permission. The petition is allowed and Ext.P3 is to be implemented in letter and spirit, applying the Noorul Islam principle.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner (applicant) seeks to implement Ext.P3, directing the respondents to stop the mosque/occupancy and to enforce building rules; asks for action on complaints (Exhibits P6-P8) and restraining the 6–10 respondents from using or regularising the newly constructed building for religious purposes pending disposal of related Ombudsman proceedings.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents contest the current occupancy, arguing the building was permitted for hostel/home stay; occupancy as a mosque or madrassa requires proper permission and compliance with building rules. The petition seeks to compel enforcement of Ext.P3 and adherence to Noorul Islam Samskarika Sangam’s principle; Respondents advocate maintaining legal control and ensuring compliance with regulatory procedures.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Noorul Islam Samskarika Sangam v. District Collector, Malappuram2022 (5) KHC 595PositiveCited to support the principle that a building permitted for a particular use cannot be repurposed for religious occupancy without proper authorization; the court applies this principle in the present case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against K.M.Kamarban v. State of Kerala & Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021 1 ## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN** **FRIDAY, THE 17[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 28TH MAGHA, 1944** ## **WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021** ## **PETITIONER/S:** K.M.KAMARBAN AGED 70 YEARS W/O.T.N.SAIDU MUHAMMED,THARAKAN HOUSE, PARIYARAM POST,CHELANJICHAL. BY ADV CELINE JOSEPH ## **RESPONDENT/S:** - 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695001. - 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673122. - 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673122. - 4 THE SECRETARY, MUTTIL GRAMA PANCHAYATH,MUTTIL.P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT673122. - 5 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, KALPETTA,WAYANAD DISTRICT-673121. - 6 C.M.ASSASSUL ISLAM SANGAM, PARIYARAM POST,WAYANAD,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT PRESIDENT,AHAMMED SHA,AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,URRUTTIYIL HOUSE,CHILANJICHAL,PARIYARAM POST, WAYANAD DISTRICT- WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021 2 673122. 7 PUTHENKANDY ABOOBACKER, AGED 42 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PUTHUKKANDY HOUSE,PULLERI,PARIYARAM POST, CHELANJICHAL,WAYANAD,SECRETARY,C.M.ASSASSUL ISLAM SANGAM,PARIYARAM-673122. 8 HAMID ANAS SAKHAFI, S/O ABDUL KHADER FAISY,ULLATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHELANJICHAL,PARIYARAM POST-673122. 9 JUMAILTH, W/O HAMID ANAS SKHAFI,ULLATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHELANJICHAL,PARIYARAM POST-673122. 10 *P.A.SALAHUDHEEN, PULAVOOR VEEDU,(FATHIMA MANZIL), PARIYARAM POST673122. DELETED THE 10TH RESPONDENT FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER DATED 02.08.2021 IN IA 3/2021 IN WPC 8847/2021 BY ADVS. SMT.JAYASREE K.P. MOHAMED JAMEEL P.K RAFFEEKH.K P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH ## **OTHER PRESENT:** SMT.SURYA BINOY, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021 3 ## **P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J** **--------------------------------------W.P.(C) No. 8847 of 2021** **-------------------------------------Dated this the 17[th] day of February, 2023** ## **JUDGMENT** ## The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : “a. to issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ or necessary directions to the respondents No.2 to 5 to execute the Exhibit P3order No. No.A4-4260/20 dated 31.12.2020 issued by the 4th respondent to stop the functioning of the building as Mosque and use of the high power amplifiers and loud speakers in offering prayers and other activities. b. To issue direction to the Secretary Muttil Grama Panchayath to restrain from assigning building no./regularizing the newly constructed building adjacent to the existing Mosque, which was constructed without requisite building permit and constructed the same in violation of building rules by the respondents 6 to 10,till the disposal of the O.P.153/2020 of the Hon'ble Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions and that too after hearing the petitioner herein. c. issue a writ, order or direction declaring that the action of the 4th respondent in not taking action for removal of illegal construction made by the 6 to 10 respondents as illegal and WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021 4 arbitrary and consequently direct the 4th respondent to take action for removal of the constructions made in contravention of building permit and not to allow the 6 to 10 respondents to use the newly constructed building for conduct of Madrassa and pass such other or further order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. d. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the respondents to take appropriate action on complaints/representations of the petitioner especially Exhibit P6 to P8, within a time limit to be prescribed by this Honourable Court. e. Such other and further reliefs which this court deems fit to grant under the circumstances of the case.” [SIC] 2. The main prayer in this writ petition is to implement Ext.P3 order issued by the 4[th] respondent-Panchayat. The petitioner is residing in Chilanjichal in Wayanad District. It is the case of the petitioner that on the western side of the petitioner's property, respondent Nos. 6 to 10 constructed building after obtaining building permit from the 4[th] respondent. The permit was obtained for constructing a private hostel and a home stay. It is the grievance of the petitioner that after completion of the building, the respondent Nos. 6 to 9 began to use the same as a Mosque C.M.Assassul Islam Sunni WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021 5 Juma Masjid. It is the case of the petitioner that the building was constructed without observing any of the rules laid down in building rules. It is the grievance of the petitioner that even though the Panchayat found that there is violation of Rules and issued Ext.P3, the same is not implemented. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 6 and 7. 4. This Court in **Noorul Islam Samskarika Sangam** v. **District Collector, Malappuram** [2022 (5) KHC 595] observed that the construction of building under a permit for a particular purpose and subsequently seeking change of occupancy for using it as religious place cannot be allowed without permission from the concerned authority. Admittedly, the petitioner obtained building permit to construct a private hostel and home stay. The grievance of the petitioner is that now the same is using as a Mosque. This cannot be permitted in the light of the principle laid down by this Court in **Noorul Islam Samskarika Sangam's** case (supra). WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021 6 Therefore, this writ petition is allowed in the following manner : 1) The respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are directed to see that Ext.P3 is implemented in letter and spirit as long as Ext.P3 is in force. The respondent Nos. 2 to 4 will also see that the principle laid down by this Court in **Noorul Islam Samskarika Sangam's** case (supra) is also strictly followed in its letter and spirit. ## **Sd/-** **P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE** SKS WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021 7 ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8847/2021** PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN WP(C)16195/2020 DATED 24.08.2020 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 08.12.2020. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31.12.2020 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 05.02.2021 ISSUED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT. EXHIBIT P5(A) TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD DATED 08.02.2021. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.02.2021 BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,WAYANAD. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.02.2021 BEFORE THE POLICE CHIEF,WAYANAD. EXHIBIT P8 TR9UE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.02.2021 BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT DATED 23-6-2022 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, KALPATTA. Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT DATED 20-07-2022 SUBMITTED BY THE COMMISSIONER BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, KALPATTA. Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17-11-2021 OF THE OMBUDSMAN OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT WP(C) NO. 8847 OF 2021 8 INSTITUTIONS, TRIVANDRUM. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R7(B) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 04/07/2022 IN O.P 153/2022 OF HONOURABLE OMBUDSMAN FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM Exhibit R7(C) TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S 121/2022 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KALPETTA