K.J. Joy Karikkadu v. Nedumudy Village Service Co-Operative Society Ltd and others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Devan Ramachandran
- Judgment Date
- 2022-06-24
- Court Decision / Holding
- The writ petition is allowed. The competent Authority of the 5th respondent is directed to initiate revenue recovery actions to recover the amounts reflected in Exts. P5 and P7, with interest, within one month from receipt of a copy of this judgment. Upon such requisition, the 6th respondent (District Collector) or any other competent Authority shall initiate and complete recovery under the Revenue Recovery Act within six months. After funds are recovered and remitted to the 5th respondent’s account, they shall immediately pay the eligible pension and arrears to the petitioner.
- Final Disposition
- Writ petition allowed; directions issued for revenue recovery and pension payment
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- K.J. Joy Karikkadu
Respondents
- Nedumudy Village Service Co-Operative Society Ltd. No.2331 represented by its Secretary, Nedumudy P.O, Alappuzha District-688508
- Board of Directors of the Nedumudy Village Service Co-Operative Society Ltd No.2331 represented by its President, Nedumudy P.O, Alappuzha District-688508
- Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Kuttanad, Alappuzha District
- Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Alappuzha, Alappuzha District
- Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Board, represented by its Secretary, P.B. No.85, Chinmaya Lane, Kunnumpuram, Thiruvananthapuram-695001
- Addl. R6. District Collector, 1st Floor, Collectorate, Alappuzha, Kerala – 688001
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • T.R. Harikumar
- • Sri Arjun Raghavan
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri M. Sasindran
- • Sri Joshy Thannickamattom (GP)
Case Synopsis & Summary
The petitioner, a retired employee, approached the Kerala High Court seeking payment of his pension which had not been disbursed since his retirement in 2006. The 5th respondent, Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Board (Pension Board), contends it cannot pay until the Nedumudy Village Service Co-Operative Society Ltd. (the 1st respondent) remits its contributions, including arrears and interest, which have been quantified and demanded (Exts. P5 and P7). The petitioner argues that Clause 38 of the Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Fund Scheme, 1994, read with Clause 38A, authorizes recovery of the dues through the Revenue Recovery Act so that pension can commence from the date contributions are paid or recovered. The 5th respondent cites Sambasivan Nair.T.R v. Kerala State Cooperative Employees Pension Board (2012) 3 KHC 518, indicating recovery can be directed against the Society’s office-bearers, subject to cooperation by the competent Recovery Authority. Government Pleader notes the Society has no assets, but accepts that necessary steps can be taken if requisition is made. The Court observes that the Society has not contested the quantification and has not appeared, and has thus directed that revenue recovery be initiated within one month for Exts. P5 and P7, with completion within six months after requisition to the District Collector or other competent authority, and upon recovery, pension with arrears shall be paid to the petitioner.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioner was pension-eligible but has remained unpaid due to the Society’s failure to remit contributions. The Pension Board is duty-bound to recover dues under Clause 38 and 38A of the Pension Scheme via Revenue Recovery so that pension and arrears become payable to the petitioner. The Court should direct immediate action for recovery and ensure pension disbursal upon realisation of the dues, given the Society’s non-compliance and lack of other assets.
Contentions of Respondents
The Pension Board argues that recoveries are permissible under Clause 38, with Sambasivan Nair.T.R v. Kerala State Cooperative Employees Pension Board cited to show recovery can be directed against the Society’s President and Secretary. If necessary, Recovery Authority cooperation is expected. The District Collector notes the Society’s lack of assets; however, if requisitioned, steps for recovery can proceed. The Government Pleader asserts that necessary steps can be taken upon requisition by the Board.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sambasivan Nair.T.R v. Kerala State Cooperative Employees Pension Board and another | 2012(3) KHC 518 | Positive | Cited as authority for recovering contributions from the Society’s office-bearers under Clause 38 of the Pension Scheme; supports the outcome directing recovery actions. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against K.J. Joy Karikkadu v. Nedumudy Village Service Co-Operative Society Ltd and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.