High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed; Land Tribunal Tirur is ...

Khadeeja v. Land Tribunal (LR) and Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.8173 OF 2021 (V)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-29
Court Decision / Holding
This writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur to dispose of S.M.No.421/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017) and incorporating GO 09/2018/RD, with no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed; Land Tribunal Tirur is directed to dispose of S.M.No.421/2021 in strict accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri's directions, incorporating GO 2018 RD, with no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • KHADEEJA

Respondents

  • LAND TRIBUNAL (LAND REFORMS)
  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. U.K. Devidas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT REKHA C NAIR - Sr. Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Khadeeja, a petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenges a suo motu proceeding initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur (S.M. No.421/2021) for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The writ petition seeks a mandamus directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of the matter. The Court anchors its reasoning in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) and another, a 2018 decision (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases), which directed expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases on seniority and laid down timeline-based expectations: senior citizens must be disposed of on seniority within six months; other cases within 18 months, with flexibility to obtain reports via Village Officers where there are delays. The judgment also notes the Government GO 09/2018/RD to facilitate information through Village Officers. In considering the pendency and process, the Court directs disposition of S.M. No.421/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, and disposes the petition with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority principle in disposal of Land Tribunal cases (dispose senior citizen cases on seniority basis)
  • Expeditious disposal of cases (timely processing of applications/petitions)
  • Reports through Village Officers when Revenue Inspectors are delayed
  • Do not break seniority of cases except as directed by Court or higher authority

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner sought a mandamus directing expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.421/2021, arguing that delay defeats the purpose of vesting and assignment schemes under Kerala Land Reforms Act and that the court’s prior directions in Narayanan Namboodiri should guide expeditious disposal.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents emphasized adherence to seniority and due process, highlighting pendency (reporting 4987 suo motu cases), the need to avoid out-of-turn dispositions, and reliance on Narayanan Namboodiri and GO 2018 RD to manage information flow and expedite cases within the prescribed timelines.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as the controlling precedent for expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions; the present Court adopts and applies the six-month/six-month and eighteen-month timelines and the procedure for obtaining reports via Village Officers.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Khadeeja v. Land Tribunal (LR) and Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 8TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.8173 OF 2021(V)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **KHADEEJA, AGED 59 YEARS W/O. ABDURAHMAN, PALOLI HOUSE, VAILIKULAMBU, EDARIKODE P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**LAND TRIBUNAL (LAND REFORMS)**| |---|---| ||**TIRUR, TIRUR P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 101.**| |**2**|**SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,**| ||**(LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR,**| ||**TIRUR P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 101.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT REKHA C NAIR - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.8173 OF 2021(V) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.421/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 03.24 Ares of land comprised in Sy.No.234/1-10 of Kottakkal Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.8173 OF 2021(V) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.8173 OF 2021(V) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.8173 OF 2021(V) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.8173 OF 2021(V) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kottakkal Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.421/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 report dated 24.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. W.P(C).No.8173 OF 2021(V) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.421/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.421/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.8173 OF 2021(V) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE SUOMOTO REPROT DATED 24.02.2021 SUBMITTED BY SPECIAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, TIRUR BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN S.M. NO. 421/2021.**