High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed; Land Tribunal directed ...

Kannan and Thathakutty v. Land Tribunal for Alathur Taluk, Ottappalam; Tahsildar, Alathur; Village Officer, Thenkurussi

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6107 of 2021(K)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-09
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed of the writ petition directing the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, to dispose of S.M. No.13/2017 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (as supra), including priority to senior citizens and expeditious disposal, and without any order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M. No.13/2017 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions and law; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Kannan
  • Thathakutty

Respondents

  • Land Tribunal
  • Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Alathur, Palakkad District
  • Village Officer, Thenkurussi Village, Thenkurussi P.O., Alathur, Palakkad-678671

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. SMT.P.K.Santhamma

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the suo motu proceeding initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, in respect of 0.1360 hectares in Re.Sy.No.53/22, Block 18, Thenkurissi Village, Palakkad. The petitioners, two senior citizens aged 68 and 71, seek mandamus to compel expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.13/2017 on the Land Tribunal’s file, arguing delay threatens their housing and financial security and that urgency is heightened by personal circumstances (daughter’s forthcoming marriage). The respondents counter that disposal must respect seniority and the law; pendency is substantial. The court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri decision (14.03.2018) mandating expeditious disposal in senior citizen cases and enabling reports via Village Officers to avoid avoidable delays, while preserving seniority. It emphasizes that the Land Tribunal must act strictly in accordance with the Narayanan Namboodiri directions and relevant statutory rules, noting the Government’s stance on prioritizing senior citizens. The writ petition is disposed without costs, directing compliance with the cited directions and legal framework for expeditious disposal.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Disposal of Land Tribunal cases on the basis of seniority of registration (seniority principle)
  • Expeditious disposal of cases filed by senior citizens
  • Not breaking the seniority of cases except as directed by this Court or higher authority
  • Obtaining requisite reports to avoid delays (via Village Officers when necessary)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners, senior citizens aged 68 and 71, urged expeditious inquiry and disposal of S.M. No.13/2017 on the Land Tribunal’s file, citing urgency due to personal circumstances (daughter’s marriage) and the need for a certificate of purchase to secure loans; they relied on the seniority-based disposal framework and the Narayanan Namboodiri directive for speedy handling of elderly cases.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents pointed to substantial pendency (2434 cases) and emphasized adherence to legal provisions and orders; they suggested reports can be obtained efficiently (via Village Officers) and noted the Government’s principle of prioritizing senior citizens while ensuring due process and seniority-based disposal.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveJudgment relied upon and followed for expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions; GO 2018 RD guidelines incorporated.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Kannan and Thathakutty v. Land Tribunal for Alathur Taluk, Ottappalam; Tahsildar, Alathur; Village Officer, Thenkurussi and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.6107 OF 2021(K)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** |**1**|**KANNAN, AGED 68 YEARS**| |---|---| ||**S/O NAYADY, VANIYAM PARAMBIL HOUSE,**| ||**THENKURISSI P.O.PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 671.**| |**2**|**THATHAKUTTY, AGED 71 YEARS**| ||**W/O LATE KOMBI, VANIYAM PARAMBIL HOUSE,**| ||**THENKURISSI P.O.PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 671.**| ||**BY ADV. SMT.P.K.SANTHAMMA**| ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**LAND TRIBUNAL**| |---|---| ||**OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL FOR ALATHUR TALUK,**| ||**OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679 101.**| |**2**|**TAHSILDAR,**| ||**TALUK OFFICE, ALATHUR,**| ||**PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 541.**| |**3**|**VILLAGE OFFICER,**| ||**THENKURUSSI VILLAGE,**| ||**THENKURISSI P.O.ALATHUR, PALAKKAD-678 671.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY, SR. GP** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6107 OF 2021(K) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Tahasildar to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.13/2017 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.1360 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.53/22 in Block No.18 in Thenkurissi Village in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.6107 OF 2021(K) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.6107 OF 2021(K) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.6107 OF 2021(K) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.6107 OF 2021(K) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thenkurissi Village, the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.13/2017, as evidenced by Ext.P3 report dated 17.12.2016, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioners would point out that the petitioners are senior citizens aged 68 years and 71 years respectively. The learned counsel would also point out that the marriage of the 1[st] petitioner's daughter is fixed on W.P(C).No.6107 OF 2021(K) -7- 16.05.2021. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam is 2434. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.13/2017 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, to dispose of S.M. No.13/2017, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6107 OF 2021(K) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE 1ST PETITIONER** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE 2ND PETITIONER** **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 17.12.2016 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF THE LAND** - **EXHIBIT P4** **TRUE COPY OF THE EXTRACT IF FILED SKETCH NUMBER 53 IN BLOCK NO 18/3 OF THENKURISSI VILLAGE** - **EXHIBIT P5** **TRUE COPY OF FORM F OF BASIC TAX REGISTER OF ALATHUR TALUK, BLOCK 18 WITH THE 3RD RESPONDENTS OFFICE** **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE PERMANENT REGISTER KEPT WITH OFFICE OF R3 STATUS OF LAND IN OLD SY NO 1158/14 IN R3 VILLAGE OFFICE** - **EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 17.12.2016 REGARDING THE HOLDING OF LAND BY THE PETITIONER** **EXHIBIT P8** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE BY R3 SHOWING THAT THE 0.1360 HECTARES OF LAND COMPRISED IN OLD SURVEY NO 115B/4PT, RE-SURVEY NO 18/53/22 IS FREE FROM ALL ENCUMBRANCES** **EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE MAHAZER DATED 17.12.2016 PREPARED BY SRI OF R3S OFFICE WITH RESPECT OF THE LAND** **EXHIBIT P10** **TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 6.2.2021 MADE BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT**