High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of

Kamalam v. Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-26
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M. No.155/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases), with no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Kamalam

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (LR) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Mini Civil Station

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. V.A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Kamalam, a 64-year-old senior citizen, files a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the delay in disposal of suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi (S.M. No.155/2021) for assignment of right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Sections 72 and 72K read with Rule 14. The land in question is 0.0404 hectares of Re.Sy. No.292/5 in Kuthanur-I Village, Palakkad. The petitioner seeks a mandamus to compel expeditious enquiry and disposal within a timeframe to be fixed by the Court. The Land Tribunal’s suo motu initiation relies on Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 and related provisions. The Court references Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) (2018) to emphasize that disposal must follow seniority and that senior-citizen cases should be prioritized, with timelines (six months for senior citizens; up to 18 months for others) and the seniority not to be broken. The judgment also cites G.O. 2018/ RD provisions enabling village officers to furnish reports. The Court ultimately disposes of the petition by directing compliance with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 72, Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K, Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14, Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5, Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99, Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases by Land Tribunals on the basis of seniority; priority to senior citizens’ cases.
  • Not breaking the seniority of cases except as directed by this Court or higher authorities.
  • Use of reports from Village Officers to facilitate timely action by Land Tribunals.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for mandamus to ensure expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.155/2021 by the Land Tribunal, asserting that delay jeopardizes the senior citizen’s access to land rights under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. Reliance is placed on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision and GO 2018 directives to prioritize senior-citizen cases and streamline notices and reports through Village Officers to avoid unnecessary delays.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent points to the overall pendency (11078) in Land Tribunal proceedings and seeks adherence to statutory procedures and court directions. Emphasis is placed on maintaining seniority, obtaining notices or reports efficiently, and following the guidance of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment and GO 2018 provisions to ensure orderly, law-based disposal within the legal framework.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCourt relies on and applies the directions from the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment to direct expeditious disposal in accordance with seniority and related guidelines.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Kamalam v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **KAMALAM, AGED 64 YEARS D/o. LATE CHAMI, KALLEKKAD HOUSE, KUTHANUR-I VILLAGE, ALALTHUR, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R), MINI CIVIL STATION,** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.155/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0404 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.292/5 in Block No.12 of Kuthanur-I Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kuthanur-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.155/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 03.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 64 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.155/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.155/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7985 OF 2021(W) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:** **EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 03.02.2021.**