High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions to di...

Kalyani v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Ottappalam

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-25
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, to dispose of S.M. No.832/2018 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri, referred to supra, and in line with the GO 2018 RD instructions. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions to dispose of S.M.832/2018 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions and law; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • KALYANI, AGED 67 YEARS W/O.LATE. VELAN, MATHAKKODE, THENKURISSI-II VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD

Respondents

  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.), OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD 679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY -SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

Kalyani, a 67-year-old petitioner, seeks a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution to compel the Special Tahsildar (LR), Ottappalam, to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.832/2018 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam. The suo motu proceedings were initiated under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, in respect of 0.0520 hectares in Sy.No.157/13, Block No.20, Thenkurissi-II Village, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad. The petitioner argues that being a senior citizen, she requires expeditious resolution, particularly since the length of pending matters delays access to credit from banks. The respondent pleads the overall pendency of Land Tribunal cases (2434) and emphasizes adherence to statutory procedures. The Court revisits Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and others, noting the obligation to dispose cases in seniority and to expedite matters involving senior citizens, as per the directions in that judgment and GO 2018 RD. The Court ultimately directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.832/2018 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, within the relevant legal framework, without awarding costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 14Section 99 of Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner submits that as a senior citizen she is entitled to expeditious disposal of S.M.832/2018. She seeks a mandamus to ensure expeditious enquiry and disposal before the Land Tribunal, contending delays defeat the purpose of the Land Reforms statutes and impact her access to credit. She relies on the need to adhere to seniority-based disposal as laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri and seeks prompt action under the applicable Rules and GO directives.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent government pleader highlights the significant pendency before the Land Tribunal (2434 cases) and urges strict adherence to the statutory framework. He notes that reports can be obtained via Village Officers as per GO 2018 and argues for compliance with seniority-based disposal, while acknowledging the need for expeditious action within the law and with cooperation from the applicant in notifying landowners.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCited and followed; the judgment directs expeditious disposal of senior citizen cases per the Narayanan Namboodiri directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Kalyani v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Ottappalam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **KALYANI, AGED 67 YEARS W/O.LATE. VELAN, MATHAKKODE, THENKURISSI-II VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.), OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD 679 104** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY -SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.832/2018 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0520 Hectares of land comprised in Sy.No.157/13 in Block No.20 of Thenkurissi-II Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thenkurissi-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.832/2018, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 21.03.2018, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 67 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam is 2434. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.832/2018 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, to dispose of S.M. No.832/2018, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7845 OF 2021(E) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 21.3.2018 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.**