High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of

K. P. Gopalakrishnan Nair v. District Collector, Suo Motu Corrected Deputy Collector (LR) & LR, Special Tahsildar (LR) Ernakulam Land Tribunal, Village Officer Kunukara, Thiruvanchikulam Devasom

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.4218 of 2021 (B)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-02
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent Deputy Collector (LT & LR) to dispose of S.M.P. No.17/2018 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C) No.28398/2017 and connected cases), and with priority to expeditious disposal for senior citizens while maintaining seniority.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • K. P. Gopalakrishnan Nair

Respondents

  • District Collector, Collectora te, Kakkanad, Ernakulam
  • Suo Motu Corrected Deputy Collector (LR), Collectorate, Kakkanad, Ernakulam (as per order dated 02-03-2021)
  • Special Tahsildar (LR), Ernakulam Land Tribunal, Thripunithura
  • Village Officer, Kunukara Village, Ernakulam District
  • Thiruvanchikulam Devasom, Thiruvanchikkulam, Kodungallur P.O., Thrissur District, rep. by its Manager

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sm t. P. S. Preetha

Counsels for Respondents

  • • A.C. Vidhya (Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, a 70-year-old senior citizen, files this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to compel the 2nd respondent, the Deputy Collector (LT & LR), to expeditiously adjudicate S.M.P. No.17/2018 (originally S.M.P. No.788/2014) pending before the Land Tribunal, Ernakulam, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal based on a Village Officer’s report under the 1963 Act. The petitioner cites the Narayanan Namboodiri decision (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, 14.03.2018), which directed expeditious disposal of such cases, adherence to seniority, and allowing Village Officers to provide information to the Tribunal to avoid delays, and urged the Court to follow those guidelines. The Government Pleader notes a substantial pendency of 921 suo motu proceedings. The Court directs the 2nd respondent to dispose of S.M.P.17/2018 strictly in accordance with law and in line with the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, especially prioritizing senior-citizen cases and preserving seniority, and dispose of the matter without cost as no order on costs is made. The judgment emphasizes timely disposal and procedural efficiency in accordance with prior judicial directions.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 14

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases by the Land Tribunal
  • Adherence to seniority in disposal of cases (seniority of registration)
  • Priority to expeditious disposal for senior citizens
  • Not breaking the established seniority unless directed by the Court or higher authority

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for mandamus to compel expeditious disposal of S.M.P.No.17/2018 before the Deputy Collector (LT & LR), invoking directions from Narayanan Namboodiri’s decision and stressing the elderly petitioner’s status to secure expedited relief and timely disposal in a matter of priority. The argument emphasizes the need to adhere to seniority in disposal and to utilize village officer reports to avoid delays.

Contentions of Respondents

The Government Pleader points to the large pendency—921 suo motu proceedings—and contends that disposal must follow established seniority and legal procedures, with the Land Tribunal adhering to the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri and other applicable rules.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relies on the Narayanan Namboodiri directions for expeditious disposal and seniority-based processing, applying those directives to the present case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against K. P. Gopalakrishnan Nair v. District Collector, Suo Motu Corrected Deputy Collector (LR) & LR, Special Tahsildar (LR) Ernakulam Land Tribunal, Village Officer Kunukara, Thiruvanchikulam Devasom and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.4218 OF 2021(B)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **K.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR AGED 70 YEARS S/O.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, PALLATH VEEDU, SREERAGAM, ALANGAD, NEERIKODU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SMT.P.S.PREETHA** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** - **1 DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAND P.O., ERNAKULAM 682 030** - **2 SUO MOTU CORRECTED, DEPUTY COLLECTOR(LR) COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD P.O., ERNAKULAM 682 030 THE DESCRIPTION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT IS SUO MOTU CORRECTED AS DEPUTY COLLECTOR(LT AND LR), COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM AS PER ORDER DATED 02-03-2021 IN WP(C)4218/2021** - **3 SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) ERNAKULAM LAND TRIBUNAL, THRIPUNITHURA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 682 031** - **4 VILLAGE OFFICER KUNNUKARA VILLAGE OFFICE, KUNNUKARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 578** - **5 THIRUVANCHIKULAM DEVASOM, THIRUVANCHIKKULAM, KODUNGALLUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 664, REP.BY ITS MANAGER** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C.VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.4218 OF 2021(B) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Deputy Collector (LT and LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.P.No.17/2018, originally pending before the Land Tribunal, Ernakulam as S.M.P.No.788/2014, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ernakulam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 36 cents of land comprised in Sy.No.465/6 and 21 cents of land comprised in Sy.No.465/9 of Kunnukara Village, Paravoor Taluk in Ernakulam District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.4218 OF 2021(B) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.4218 OF 2021(B) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.4218 OF 2021(B) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.4218 OF 2021(B) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kunnukara Village, the Land Tribunal, Ernakulam initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.P.No.788/2014, which is now pending before the 2[nd] respondent as S.M.P.No.17/2018, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 70 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.4218 OF 2021(B) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the 2[nd] respondent Deputy Collector (LT & LR), is 921. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the 2[nd] respondent Deputy Collector (LT & LR) can be directed to dispose of S.M.P.No.17/2018 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 2[nd] respondent Deputy Collector (LT & LR), to dispose of S.M.P. No.17/2018, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.4218 OF 2021(B) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF R4 SUBMITTED BEFORE R2 DATED 22.9.2014** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 9.5.2016 ISSUED BY R3** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF REPORT DATED 30.5.2016 SUBMITTED BY R4** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 9.5.2016 ISSUED BY R3 TO R2 WITH COPY TO THE PETITIONER.** **EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11.2.2019 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT TO 4TH RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 25.2.2019 SUBMITTED BY 4TH RESPONDENT BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT.**