Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- A. BADHARUDEEN
- Judgment Date
- 2023-03-28
- Court Decision / Holding
- The petition stands partly allowed. The 3rd accused’s anticipatory bail plea is dismissed. Accused Nos. 5, 6 and 7 are enlarged on bail with conditions: (i) surrender before the Investigating Officer within ten days; on arrest they must be produced before the jurisdictional court on the same day; (ii) bond of Rs. 30,000 with two solvent sureties; (iii) they shall cooperate with the investigation and be available for interrogation as directed; (iv) they shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation; (v) they shall meet the Investigating Officer on all Mondays for six weeks; (vi) they shall not commit any offence during the currency of bail and any such involvement may cancel the bail.
- Final Disposition
- Partly allowed; bail granted to accused Nos. 5, 6 and 7; bail denied to accused No. 3.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- SHIJIN @ KUTTAPPAI
- Accused Nos. 5, 6 & 7 (names not provided in document)
Respondents
- State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam
- Station House Officer, Eravipuram Police Station, Kollam
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Pratheesh.P
- • Anjana Kannath
Counsels for Respondents
- • Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala
Case Synopsis & Summary
This is a High Court of Kerala (Ernakulam) anticipatory bail matter bearing Bail Application No. 1123 of 2023 arising from Crime No. 1812/2022 of Eravipuram Police Station, Kollam. Accused Nos. 3, 5, 6 and 7 seek anticipatory bail in connection with a serious incident on 24.12.2022, described as forming into an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons and assaulting the de facto complainant and his friends with the apparent object of committing culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The FIR lists offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 326 and 294(b) IPC, with a reference to Section 149 CrPC as well as IPC, 1860. The petitioners contend there were no specific overt acts attributable to them individually; the injuries recorded include those on the head and limbs, sustained by the complainant largely due to acts of the first and second accused, with one co-accused being a minor. They urge that anticipatory bail should be granted with suitable conditions; the State argues there are specific allegations, notably the 3rd accused allegedly using a beer bottle to strike the complainant, and that eight persons assaulted him, necessitating custodial interrogation for a meaningful investigation. After hearing and perusal, the court dismisses the bail application of the 3rd accused while partly allowing bail for accused Nos. 5, 6 and 7 on conditions such as surrender within ten days, bond of Rs. 30,000 with two sureties, cooperation, non-interference, and weekly meetings with the IO for six weeks.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners argue that there is no specific overt act attributable to each petitioner; injuries shown in medical records were primarily caused by the first and second accused; one co-accused is a minor. They contend that custodial interrogation of all petitioners is unnecessary and seek anticipatory bail with reasonable conditions, asserting that the investigation can progress without arresting the petitioners.
Contentions of Respondents
The State contends there are specific allegations against the accused, including the 3rd accused using a beer bottle to strike the de facto complainant, with eight persons allegedly involved. Given the seriousness of injuries and the presence of an an array of accused, custodial interrogation is deemed necessary to advance the investigation and prosecution.
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.