High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of

Jisha Krishna v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Deputy Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.265 of 2021(G)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-01-18
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur to dispose of S.M.No.1265/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, and to adhere to the seniority-based timetable and procedures outlined therein.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Jisha Krishna

Respondents

  • Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur
  • Special Deputy Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur, Malappuram District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • U.K. Devidas
  • • S. Bijilal

Counsels for Respondents

  • • K. Amminikutty

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Jisha Krishna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to compel the respondents to dispose of S.M. No.1265/2020, as evidenced by Ext. P1, within a time frame to be fixed by the Court. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The matter draws on the court’s earlier pronouncements in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, where the Court underscored the importance of expeditious disposal while preserving the seniority of cases, and permitted the use of Village Officers to obtain requisite reports to expedite proceedings. The Court observed that while there is a total pendency in the Land Tribunal, the priority for senior citizens and adherence to seniority must guide disposal. The petition was disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur to dispose of S.M. No.1265/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 5G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner sought a mandamus to compel expeditious disposal of S.M.No.1265/2020, highlighting the practical need for a purchase certificate to secure loans and emphasizing adherence to the seniority-based framework established by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri. The petitioner urged that the Land Tribunal follow the directions in the earlier judgment to prevent derailing the disposal process and to ensure timely issuance of the certificate of purchase, thereby preventing undue delays.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents, represented by the Senior Government Pleader, argued the necessity of balancing expeditious disposal with due process, noting the large pendency before the Land Tribunal. They endorsed maintaining seniority and avoiding out-of-turn disposal, while enabling timely reporting via Village Officers as directed in prior judgments and orders, and ensuring compliance with the governing statutory framework.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveThe judgment under reference is cited for establishing the procedure of expeditious disposal and seniority-based disposal; the present Court directs disposal in strict accordance with the directions from Narayanan Namboodiri.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Jisha Krishna v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Deputy Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 28TH POUSHA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.265 OF 2021(G)** ## **PETITIONER:** **JISHA KRISHNA AGED 40 YEARS W/O. RAVI KODAKKADATH, KODAKKADATH HOUSE, KARATHOOR, THIRUNAVAYA, CODACAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 108** **BY ADVS. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS SRI.S.BIJILAL** ## **RESPONDENTS:** |**1**|**LAND TRIBUNAL (LAND REFORMS)**| |---|---| ||**TIRUR, TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 101**| |**2**|**SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,(LAND REFORMS),**| ||**LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O, MALAPPURAM**| ||**DISTRICT-679 101**| ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY-SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** WP(C)No.265 of 2021 2 ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to dispose of S.M.No.1265/2020 as evidenced by Ext.P1, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 7.39 Ares of land comprised in Sy.No.293/2-2 of Purathoor Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] WP(C)No.265 of 2021 3 this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action WP(C)No.265 of 2021 4 necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. WP(C)No.265 of 2021 5 - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ WP(C)No.265 of 2021 6 RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Purathoor, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1265/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 31.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1265/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by WP(C)No.265 of 2021 **==> picture [7 x 9] intentionally omitted <==** directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.1265/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE** **yd** WP(C)No.265 of 2021 8 ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:** ## **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 31.12.2020 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.** ## **RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL** **TRUE COPY** **P.A. TO JUDGE**