High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed; Land Tribunal Ottapalam...

Jameela v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and Land Tribunal Ottapalam

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-02-04
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed; Land Tribunal Ottapalam directed to dispose of S.M. No.965/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions and the GO 09/2018 RD guidelines; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed; Land Tribunal Ottapalam to dispose of S.M.965/2020 strictly in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions and GO 09/2018 RD; No order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • JAMEELA, AGED 75 YEARS W/O. KAREEM, RESIDING AT THEKKEMURIYIL, PUTHIYANKAM P.O, ALATHUR, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 545

Respondents

  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) AND LAND TRIBUNAL OTTAPALAM MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, OTTAPALAM P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI. BABY MATHEW

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks mandamus to compel the Special Tahsildar (LR) to expeditiously examine and dispose of S.M. No. 965/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam. The Land Tribunal had initiated suo motu proceedings under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord's rights vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, in respect of a 0.0174 hectare property in Re.Sy.No.211/21, Alathur. The petitioner, a 75-year-old senior citizen, seeks priority and expeditious disposal, arguing administrative delays and the need for timely access to funds (e.g., loans). The court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, 14.03.2018), which directs that tribunals follow seniority-based disposal and adopt practical measures to expedite cases, including obtaining reports through Village Officers if necessary. The court ultimately directs the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, to dispose of S.M. No.965/2020 strictly in accordance with law, applying the Narayanan Namboodiri directions and GO 2018 RD guidelines, without any order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority-based disposal of cases before Land Tribunals; not to break seniority except under Court directions
  • Expeditious disposal of cases, especially those filed by senior citizens
  • Utilization of Village Officers to obtain necessary reports for Land Tribunal action
  • Mandatory compliance with government orders and court directions to expedite land reform proceedings

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for mandamus to ensure expeditious processing of S.M. No. 965/2020, highlighting the petitioner’s old age and reliance on the court’s earlier directions in Narayanan Namboodiri to expedite disposal based on seniority. The request is fortified by the need to avoid delays that hinder access to finance and rightful purchase under land reforms.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent government pleader emphasizes the large backlog (2434 suo motu proceedings) and the necessity to follow established seniority and statutory procedures, potentially utilizing Village Officers for faster reporting. The respondents rely on the Narayanan Namboodiri principles as adopted by this Court, and on Government Order GO 09/2018 (RD) to streamline processes within the tribunal system.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCited as binding precedent guiding expeditious disposal, seniority-based prioritization, and procedural directions later adopted by this Court in the present case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Jameela v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and Land Tribunal Ottapalam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 15TH MAGHA,1942** **WP(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **JAMEELA, AGED 75 YEARS W/O. KAREEM, RESIDING AT THEKKEMURIYIL, PUTHIYANKAM P.O, ALATHUR, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 545** ## **BY ADV. SRI.BABY MATHEW** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) AND LAND TRIBUNAL OTTAPALAM MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, OTTAPALAM P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 679 104** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.965/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Ottappalam under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0174 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.211/21 in Block No.27 of Alathur Village in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Alathur, the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.965/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 25.11.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 75 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, W.P(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D) -7- Ottapalam is 2434. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.965/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Ottapalam, to dispose of S.M. No.965/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2833 OF 2021(D) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEASE DEED NO. 867/2015 OF SRO, ALATHUR** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 06-10-2020 ISSUED FROM ALATHUR VILALGE OFFICE** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 25-112020 IN SM NO 965/2020 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, OTTAPALAM**