High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition allowed; relief granted to petiti...

Jahafar M., Mubarak T.K., and Mohammed Noushad v. The Inspector of Police, Mannarkkad Police Station, Palakkad District, and The District Geologist, Department of Mining and Geology, Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No. 23629 of 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • N. NAGARESH
Judgment Date
2023-07-27
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is allowed. The 1st respondent is directed to release the Tipper Lorry bearing registration Nos. KL-50A-4020 and KL-53C-2348 and the Excavator bearing registration No. KL-14P-7712 to the petitioners forthwith.
Final Disposition
Writ petition allowed; relief granted to petitioners

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Jahafar M
  • Mubarak T.K
  • Mohammed Noushad

Respondents

  • The Inspector of Police, Mannarkkad Police Station, Palakkad District
  • The District Geologist, District Office, Department of Mining and Geology, Palakkad, Kerala

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • P. M. Ziraj
  • • Irfan Ziraj
  • • Bipin Krishnakumar
  • • Mohammed Shehin S.S.
  • • Vishnu P.S.
  • • Nimisha Antony
  • • Abhijith P.A.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • K M Reshmi

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioners’ vehicles were seized on 13.07.2023 by the 1st respondent under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015. A Mahazar dated 12.07.2023 (Ext.P1) was prepared, which the petitioners contend is predated and not reflective of the actual seizure. After seizure, the 1st respondent reported to the 2nd respondent by a letter dated 14.07.2023. It is alleged that two tipper lorries and an excavator were found parked at a ground named Kolappakam, with only traces of earth in the vehicles; the vehicles were seized on the basis of information received by the police. The petitioners contend there is no offence under the Rules if the vehicles are merely parked and not transporting minor minerals, and that the mere parking of empty vehicles cannot attract penalties. The petition relies on judgments like Unais v. District Collector (2023(1) KLT 651) and a Division Bench decision in W.A.No.609/2023, which held that only vehicles that transport or have transported minerals are liable to be seized, and mere intention to transport is not sufficient for penal action. The court has considered Exts.P3–P5 and held that there is no evidence of loading, unloading, or transport of minerals at the time of seizure. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition and directed the release of the seized vehicles forthwith.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Only when any person raises, transports, or causes to be raised or transported any mineral from any land, without lawful authority, an offence under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 or the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 is said to have been committed.
  • Mere intention to transport is not sufficient for penalty proceedings.
  • Vehicles which transport or have transported minerals are liable to be seized; mere parking of empty vehicles is not an offence.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners argued that their vehicles were merely parked and not transporting any minor minerals at the time of seizure; Ext.P1 shows only traces of ordinary earth and no loading of minerals. There is no allegation that the petitioners’ vehicles transported minerals without a valid pass. Mere parking of empty tipper lorries on a ground cannot attract penalties under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules. They rely on Unais v. District Collector (2023(1) KLT 651) and on the Division Bench’s decision in W.A.No.609/2023 (Ext.P4) and Ext.P5 judgments to contend for release.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents submitted that the seizure was under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, and that there were traces of earth indicating potential minor minerals; the authorities acted under statutory powers to seize vehicles that could be used for mineral transport pending investigation; the District Geologist’s office was also involved in the matter.

Cited Precedents (3)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Unais v. District Collector2023(1) KLT 651PositiveThe judgment is cited as authority for the principle that offences under the Mines and Minerals Act/Rules require actual transport of minerals; mere possession or parking does not amount to an offence.
W.A.No.609 of 2023W.A.No.609/2023PositiveDivision Bench decision cited to support the proposition that only vehicles transporting minerals are liable to seizure; the present case follows that reasoning.
WP(C) No.11862 of 2023Ext.P5PositiveExt.P5 judgment is cited to reflect a similar outcome in line with the Unais principle.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Jahafar M., Mubarak T.K., and Mohammed Noushad v. The Inspector of Police, Mannarkkad Police Station, Palakkad District, and The District Geologist, Department of Mining and Geology, Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH** **THURSDAY, THE 27[TH] DAY OF JULY 2023 / 5TH SRAVANA, 1945** ## **WP(C) NO. 23629 OF 2023** ## **PETITIONERS:** **1 JAHAFAR M AGED 45 YEARS S/O HAMZA M, MANNIL HOUSE, KODAKKAD, KOTTAPADAM, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD, KERALA,PIN - 678583 (OWNER OF TIPPER LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL-50-A-4020). 2 MUBARAK T.K AGED 30 YEARS S/O HAMZA T K, THOTTIKULAYAN HOUSE, ARAKKUPARAMBA P.O, THEYYOTTUCHIRA, MALAPPURAM PIN - 679322 (OWNER OF TIPPER LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL-53-C-2348). 3 MOHAMMED NOUSHAD AGED 43 YEARS S/O MUSA HAJI, KANJIRATHIL, NATTUKAL, THACHANATTUKARA- I, PALAKKAD PIN - 678583 KERALA (OWNER OF THE EXCAVATOR JCB BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL-14-P-7712).** **BY ADVS. P.M.ZIRAJ IRFAN ZIRAJ BIPIN KRISHNAKUMAR MOHAMMED SHEHIN.S.S VISHNU P.S. NIMISHA ANTONY ABHIJITH P.A.** **RESPONDENTS:** **1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN – 678582.** 2 ## **W.P.(C) No.23629 of 2023** - **2 THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST DISTRICT OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, PALAKKAD, KERALA, PIN – 678001.** **BY ADV.K M RESHMI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** **W.P.(C) No.23629 of 2023** 3 ## **J U D G M E N T** Dated this the 27[th] day of July, 2023 The petitioners state that the vehicles of the petitioners were seized by the 1[st] respondent on 13.07.2023 under the provisions of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015. The 1[st] respondent prepared a Mahazar dated 12.07.2023 in connection with the seizure. It is understood from the contents of Ext.P1 that Ext.P1 is a predated document and prepared before the date of alleged seizure. After the seizure, the 1[st] respondent reported the matter to the office of the 2[nd] respondent by report dated 14.07.2023. The gist of the allegation against the vehicles of the petitioners is that on receipt of secret information, the 1[st] respondent along with the police party went to a place by name 4 ## **W.P.(C) No.23629 of 2023** Kolappakam and found two Tipper Lorries and an Excavator parked on a ground. 2. Thereafter, on inspection, it was found that the Lorries were empty, but there was traces of earth in each vehicle. Then, the three vehicles were seized by the 1[st] respondent. The allegations levelled against the vehicles of the petitioners are wrong and baseless, contend the petitioners. There is no allegation that the petitioners' vehicles were carrying or transporting any minor minerals without valid pass, to attract the offence. As per the allegation, the vehicles of the petitioners were parked in a ground. Immediately after seizure, the petitioners approached respondents 1 and 2 and requested to release their vehicle unconditionally. But, no action has been taken. Mere parking of empty Tipper Lorries in a ground is not an offence under the provisions of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules. ## **W.P.(C) No.23629 of 2023** 5 3. This position has been clarified by this Court in a plethora of judgments including the judgment in **Unais v. District Collector** [2023(1) KLT 651]. Against Ext.P3 judgment, the District Collector, Palakkad and others filed writ appeal before the Division Bench of this Court as W.A.No.609/2023 and the said writ appeal was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court by judgment dated 29.03.2023. The dictum of above judgments is squarely applicable in the case of the petitioners and hence the petitioners' vehicles are to be released extending the benefit of said judgments, contended the petitioners. 4. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader representing the respondents. 5. Ext.P1 Mahazar would indicate that when the Inspector of Police examined the Tipper Lorries in question, it was found that there were traces of ordinary earth in the Tipper Lorry. It is evident 6 ## **W.P.(C) No.23629 of 2023** from Ext.P1 Mahazar that the Lorry was not loaded with ordinary earth or any other minor mineral. Evidently, the vehicles were not seized at a time when ordinary earth was being uploaded or unloaded or stored. 6. This Court has considered a similar issue in **Unais v. District Collector** [2023(1) KLT 651]. This Court held that it is only when any person raises, transports, or causes to be raised or transported without any lawful authority any mineral from any land, that an offence under the Mines and Minerals (Development of Regulation) Act, 1957 or the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015, is said to have been committed. The Division Bench of this Court also took a similar view in Ext.P4 judgment in Writ Appeal No.609/2023 wherein also it has been held that only the vehicles which transport or have transported minerals are liable to be seized. The mere intention to transport is not sufficient for penalty proceedings under the Act or the Rules. Ext.P5 7 ## **W.P.(C) No.23629 of 2023** judgment is also to the same effect. In the circumstances, following the law laid down by this Court in Exts.P3 to P5 judgments, the writ petition is allowed. The 1[st] respondent is directed to release the Tipper Lorry bearing registration Nos.KL-50A-4020 and KL-53C-2348 and an Excavator bearing registration No.KL-14P-7712 to the petitioners forthwith. Sd/- **N. NAGARESH JUDGE** ams 8 ## **W.P.(C) No.23629 of 2023** ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23629/2023** **PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHASAR DATED 12.7.2023 PREPARED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 14.07.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN UNAIS VS. DISTRICT COLLECTOR REPORTED IN 2023(1) KLT 651 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 29.3.2023 IN W.A.NO.609 OF 2023 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 4.4.2023 IN WP(C) NO.11862 OF 2023**