High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeCriminal Misc Case disposed of; Annexure-A5 set...

Jaffer P.S v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:CRL.M.C. NO.8192 OF 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • P. V. Kunhikrishnan
Judgment Date
2023-10-25
Court Decision / Holding
Annexure-A5 order set aside. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakkanad, is directed to release the vehicle bearing registration No.KL-59-D-5612 after imposing the conditions mentioned in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (AIR 2003 SC 638). The petitioner shall not transfer the vehicle without the Court’s permission. The petitioner shall not commit a similar offence in the future, and if such an offence is committed, the Police authorities are free to approach the lower court and the lower court can pass appropriate orders to repossess the vehicle.
Final Disposition
Criminal Misc Case disposed of; Annexure-A5 set aside; vehicle to be released with conditions; transfer prohibited without court permission; breach may lead to repossession by police; matter disposed of by directions to release vehicle under specified conditions.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Jaffer P.S

Respondents

  • State of Kerala

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Ameer K.M.
  • • Asvino Sheej.S
  • • M.A.Moosa Kunju
  • • Fasna T.Y
  • • Hazeena Beevi N.H

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Hrithwick C.S.

Case Synopsis & Summary

Jaffer P.S., the registered owner of tanker lorry KL-59-D-5612, approaches this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash Annexure-A5, an order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakkanad, in Cr.M.P. No.3294/2023 arising from Thrikkakara Police Station Crime No.1704/2023. The police alleged offences under Section 269 IPC and Section 120(e) of the Kerala Police Act for illegally disposing of waste and polluting water resources at Chithrapuzha near Water Metro Terminal Kakkanad, with the vehicle seized. The Magistrate dismissed the 451 Cr.P.C. application, citing the seriousness of the accusation and relying on a Court order in W.P.(C) No.7844/2023 to deny interim custody. The petitioner submitted that the vehicle is his livelihood and that he is ready to comply with conditions if the vehicle is released; it was parked in an open space and vulnerable to damage. The Public Prosecutor opposed release, supporting the Magistrate’s order. After hearing both sides, the Judge held that release is warranted with stringent conditions, citing Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (AIR 2003 SC 638) to emphasize expeditious and conditioned exercise of Section 451 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, Annexure-A5 is set aside, the vehicle KL59-D-5612 should be released with conditions, and the petitioner must refrain from transferring the vehicle without court permission and from committing future offences; police may repossess if breached.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.)Section 451 of Cr.P.C.Section 269 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)Section 120(e) of the Kerala Police Act

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Powers under Section 451 Cr.P.C. should be exercised expeditiously and judiciously after imposing appropriate conditions.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argued that the vehicle is his livelihood and its continued custody is essential for sustenance; he is willing to comply with any conditions the Court may impose and requested the Court to exercise its powers under Section 451 Cr.P.C. to release the vehicle pending investigation, noting that the vehicle is currently parked in an open space and susceptible to damage.

Contentions of Respondents

The State, through the Public Prosecutor, opposed release, supporting the Magistrate’s order due to the seriousness of the allegations and the need to keep the vehicle in custody until the investigation and charge framing, if any, are resolved.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of GujaratAIR 2003 SC 638PositiveCited to justify expeditious and conditioned exercise of Section 451 Cr.P.C. for release of the vehicle.
W.P.(C). No.7844/2023W.P.(C). No.7844/2023Mentioned OnlyReferenced as context for the court’s previous stance; not treated as binding authority.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Jaffer P.S v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 3RD KARTHIKA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 8192 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER/CLAIM PETITIONER:`** ``` JAFFER P.S AGED 38 YEARS, S/O SULAIMAN, PADANNATTU HOUSE RAJEEV GANDHI COLONY BMC, THRIKKAKARA P.O, PIN - 682021 BY ADVS. AMEER.K.M. ASVINO SHEEJ.S M.A.MOOSA KUNJU FASNA T.Y HAZEENA BEEVI N.H ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/STATE:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 ``` ``` BY ADV. ``` ``` SRI. HRITHWICK C.S., PP ``` ## **`THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION`** ``` ON 25.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` CRL. M.C. NO.8192 OF 2023 ``` 2 **P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------Crl.M.C. No. 8192 of 2023 ------------------------------------Dated this the 25[th] day of October, 2023** ## **O R D E R** The above Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash Annexure-A5 order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kakkanad in Crl.M.P. No.3294/2023 in Crime No.1704/2023 of Thrikkakara Police Station. Annexure-A5 is an order passed in an application filed under Section 451 of Cr.P.C. 2. The prosecution case is that the accused used a Tanker Lorry bearing Registration No.KL-59- 3 ``` CRL. M.C. NO.8192 OF 2023 ``` D-5612 to the Chithrapuzha near Water Metro Terminal Kakkanad for dumping garbage. The petitioner who is the registered owner filed an application under Section 451 of Cr.P.C. and the same was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The allegation against the accused is that he committed the offences under Section 269 of the Indian Penal Code and 120(e) of Kerala Police Act. The vehicle was taken into custody when it was found illegally dispossessing waste and polluting water resources in Chithrapuzha near Water Metro Terminal Kakkanad. 5. The learned Magistrate dismissed the 4 ``` CRL. M.C. NO.8192 OF 2023 ``` petition filed under Section 451 of the Code mainly for the reason that the allegation against the accused is very serious and the learned Magistrate also observed that considering the spirit of the order of this Court dated 25.05.2023 in W.P.(C). No.7844/2023, the petitioner is not entitled interim custody. I think there is some force in the above finding of the learned Magistrate. 6. But, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the vehicle is the livelihood of the petitioner and he is ready to comply any conditions imposed by this Court. It is also submitted that the vehicle is now parked in an open place and if it is continued to be there, it will be damaged. The Public Prosecutor opposed the 5 ``` CRL. M.C. NO.8192 OF 2023 ``` petition and supported the order passed by the learned Magistrate. 7. After hearing both sides, I think the vehicle can be released after imposing stringent conditions. In **Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (AIR 2003 SC 638)** , the Apex Court held that powers under Section 451 should be exercised expeditiously and judiciously after imposing appropriate conditions. I am of the considered opinion that the Magistrate can be directed to release the vehicle, after imposing the conditions mentioned in **Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai’s case** (supra). Therefore, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is disposed of in the following manner: 1. Annexure-A5 order is set aside. 6 ``` CRL. M.C. NO.8192 OF 2023 ``` 2. The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kakkanad is directed to release the vehicle bearing registration No.KL59-D-5612, after imposing the conditions mentioned in **Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (AIR 2003 SC 638).** 3. The petitioner shall not transfer the vehicle without the permission of the Court. 4. The petitioner shall not commit similar offence in future and if such offence is committed, the Police Authorities are free to approach the lower court and the lower court can pass appropriate orders to repossess ``` CRL. M.C. NO.8192 OF 2023 ``` 7 the vehicle even though this order is passed by this Court. Sd/- nvj **P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE** ``` CRL. M.C. NO.8192 OF 2023 ``` 8 ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 8192/2023`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES ``` ``` ANNEXURE A1THE TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R. DATED 13.09.2023 IN CRIME NO.1704/2023 OF THRIKKAKARA POLICE STATION ``` ``` ANNEXURE A2THE TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE ANNEXURE A3THE TRUE COPY OF THE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE. ``` ``` ANNEXURE A4THE TRUE COPY OF THE CRL.MC NO.7274 OF 2023 JUDGEMENT ``` ``` ANNEXURE A5 ``` ``` THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL MP 3294/2023 DATED 26.09.2023 INCRIMENO.1704/2023OF THRIKKAKARA POLICE STATION. ``` RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS :NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE