Jacob Yan A.J and Sheon Shylan A.J v. Central Board of Secondary Education and its Regional Officer, Regional Office Thiruvananthapuram, and Principal, Arooja Little Star School, Kochi
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- P. V. Kunhikrishnan
- Judgment Date
- 2023-06-12
- Court Decision / Holding
- The writ petition is disposed of with directions: (i) The petitioners shall produce Exts. P12 to P15 before the 3rd respondent within two weeks from the certified copy of this judgment; (ii) Upon receipt, the 3rd respondent shall consider the same and take necessary steps to correct the certificates in accordance with law, in light of Exts. P12-P13 and the dictum laid down in Jigya Yadav v. CBSE (2021 (3) KLT 711), expeditiously, within one month from the date of receipt of the documents; (iii) The petitioners shall produce certified copies of the judgment along with this order before the 3rd respondent for compliance.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of with directions to correct certificates in light of Exts. P12-P15 and P12-P13, within one month after submission of documents.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Jacob Yan A.J
- Sheon Shylan A.J
Respondents
- Central Board of Secondary Education (Shiksha Kendra-2), Delhi
- Controller of Examinations, CBSE, Delhi
- Regional Officer, CBSE, Regional Office, Thiruvananthapuram
- Principal, Arooja Little Star School, Kochi
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • G. Krishnakumar
Counsels for Respondents
- • Standing Counsel for Respondents 1-3
- • Nirmal S. (for 4th respondent Principal, Arooja Little Star School)
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ petition by two CBSE students from Kochi challenges errors in their CBSE certificates and birth-related entries. The petitioners allege that the father’s name of the first petitioner is recorded as 'Jhon Roshan A.J' in Exhibit P2 instead of 'John Roshan A.J' and seek a mandamus directing the third respondent to correct the father’s name and to issue a revised mark sheet-cum-certificate. They also request correction of the petitioners’ dates of birth on the certificates to 2 September 2004 and 1 September 2004, respectively, in line with Cochin Corporation birth records. They rely on Exhibits P14 and P15 showing corrected birth certificates issued by the Corporation, and on Exhibits P12-P13 indicating communications from the Registrar of Births. They also seek dispensation of English translations of vernacular documents. Respondents contend that corrections in CBSE records must reflect the latest Corporation birth certificates and require amendment of the Corporation birth certificates to remove ambiguities before updating CBSE records. The court, after considering submissions, directs the third respondent to examine Exts. P12-P15 and take necessary steps to correct the certificates in light of Exts. P12-P13 and the dictum in Jigya Yadav v. CBSE (2021 (3) KLT 711) within one month of receipt of documents. Petition is disposed of with directions and costs.
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners contend that the father’s name of the 1st petitioner is wrongly recorded as 'Jhon Roshan A.J' instead of 'John Roshan A.J' in Exhibit P2 and seek correction and issuance of an updated mark sheet-cum-certificate. They also seek correction of the petitioners’ dates of birth to 2.9.2004 and 1.9.2004, respectively, in line with the Cochin Corporation birth certificates. They rely on Exts. P14-P15 showing corrected birth certificates and Exts. P12-P13 indicating communications from the Registrar of Births; they seek dispensation of English translations of vernacular documents. They request the 3rd respondent to consider these documents and to take necessary steps to correct the certificates in light of Exts. P12-P13 and Jigya Yadav v. CBSE (2021 (3) KLT 711), expeditiously, ideally within one month after documents are produced.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents contend that corrections in CBSE records must reflect the latest Corporation birth certificates; to effect correction, the Corporation birth certificates must be amended to remove ambiguities before updating CBSE records, and then CBSE records can be corrected per norms.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jigya Yadav v. Central Board of Secondary Education | 2021 (3) KLT 711 | Positive | Court relies on this dictum to direct expeditious correction of certificates within a month after receipt of documents. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Jacob Yan A.J and Sheon Shylan A.J v. Central Board of Secondary Education and its Regional Officer, Regional Office Thiruvananthapuram, and Principal, Arooja Little Star School, Kochi and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.