High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions to dispose of S.M. ...

Jabir vs Land Tribunal (Devaswom) Collectorate, Up Hill, Malappuram

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-09
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of with direction to the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram to dispose of S.M. Nos. 10/2021 and 12/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions (seniority-based disposal, expeditious handling of senior-citizen cases, and use of Village Officers for reports). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions to dispose of S.M. Nos.10/2021 and 12/2021 in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Jabir

Respondents

  • Land Tribunal (Devaswom) Collectorate, Up Hill P.O., Malappuram
  • Deputy Collector (Land Reforms) Land Tribunal, Malappuram

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. Sri. U.K. Devidas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Jabir, the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeks a mandamus to compel expeditious enquiry and disposal of suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram, under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The proceedings—S.M. Nos. 10/2021 and 12/2021—are for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970, in respect of portions of Sy. Nos. 351/6-4 and 351/6-3 in Nannambra Village. The petitioner argues that expeditious disposal is essential to avoid undue delays that hinder access to credit from banks and to ensure timely implementation of reform. The court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C).No. 28398 of 2017 and connected cases, 14.03.2018), which mandates disposal by seniority and provides directions to expeditiously dispose senior citizen cases. Paragraph 2 instructs the Land Tribunal to obtain reports through Village Officers if necessary, to prioritize senior citizens to conclude within six months, and to dispose other cases within 18 months, while preserving seniority. The court notes a large pendency (over 8,500 cases) but directs disposal of S.M.Nos.10/2021 and 12/2021 strictly in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, without costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India, Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, Section 99

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority-based disposal of cases by Land Tribunals
  • Priority to senior citizens in expeditious disposal of applications

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argues for mandamus to ensure expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. Nos. 10/2021 and 12/2021, emphasizing the need to avoid delays that impede the purchase certification process and credit access. It relies on the Narayanan Namboodiri framework to ensure seniority-based disposal and expedited handling of senior-citizen cases.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that disposal must follow established seniority and due process. They point to the existing backlog (thousands of suo motu matters) and urge adherence to the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri, along with using Village Officers to expedite report collection and maintaining orderly scheduling rather than out-of-turn disposal.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCourt relies on Narayanan Namboodiri for directions on expeditious disposal and seniority-based scheduling; it forms the basis for the present directions and relief.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Jabir vs Land Tribunal (Devaswom) Collectorate, Up Hill, Malappuram and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **JABIR, AGED 43 YEARS S/O. AHAMMED MUSLIYAR (LATE), KOLATHUR HOUSE, NENNAMBRA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 LAND TRIBUNAL, (DEVASWOM) COLLECTORATE, UP HILL P.O., MALAPPURAM-676 505. 2 DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND REFORMS) LAND TRIBUNAL, COLLECTORATE, UP HILL P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 505.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **VIDYA AC GP** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.Nos.10/2021 and 12/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal (Devasom), Malappuram under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 03.64 and 05.26 Ares of land comprised in Sy.Nos.351/6-4 and 351/6-3 of Nannambra Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Nannambra Village, the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.Nos.10/2021 and 12/2021, as evidenced by Exts.P1 and P2 certificates dated 08.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram is 8514. W.P(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram can be directed to dispose of S.M.Nos.10/2021 and 12/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram to dispose of S.M.Nos.10/2021 and 12/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6064 OF 2021(G) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.M2.373275/2021 DATED 8.1.2021 IN SM NO.10/2020 ISSUED BY THE COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM.** **EXHIBIT P2** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.M2.373237/2021 DATED 8.1.2021 IN SM NO.12/2021 ISSUED BY THE COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM.**