Jabir v. Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram and Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Malappuram
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K. Narendran
- Judgment Date
- 2021-03-04
- Court Decision / Holding
- Writ petition disposed of. The Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram is directed to dispose of S.M.No.9/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment, and as supplemented by the GO 09/2018 RD. No order as to costs.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of with directions; writ petition closed.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Jabir, aged 43 years S/o Ahammed Musliyar (late)
Respondents
- Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram (Land Tribunal, Collectorate, Up Hill, Malappuram District-676505)
- Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Collectorate, Up Hill, Malappuram District-676505
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Sri U.K. Devidas
Counsels for Respondents
- • Smt A.C Vidya - Government Pleader
Case Synopsis & Summary
The petitioner Jabir, through counsel, seeks a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution to compel the Deputy Collector (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.9/2021 before the Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram. The suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 are for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of about 3.64 acres of land in Sy.No.351/6-2, Nannambra village, Malappuram District. The petitioner contends delays in disposal hamper loan arrangements and cause hardship, particularly where a certificate of purchase is a precondition for bank finance. The court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and its 2018 judgment, which stressed seniority-based disposal, use of Village Officers to obtain reports, and expeditious handling of senior-citizen petitions (six months for seniors, eighteen months for others) while preserving seniority. The case notes a large pendency (over 8,500). The court directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.9/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no order as to costs.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioner argues for a mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.9/2021 before the Land Tribunal (Devaswom). The urgency stems from the need to secure a certificate of purchase under the Kerala Land Reforms Act (Sections 72 and 72K) and to obtain loan finance from banks, which is hampered by delay in disposal. The petitioner relies on the court’s prior directions in Narayanan Namboodiri to ensure seniority-based, expeditious disposal and to use Village Officers for reports when Revenue Inspectors are unavailable, with a six-month target for senior-citizen cases and an eighteen-month ceiling for others, while maintaining the order of seniority. The petitioner also emphasizes that GO 2018 guidance should facilitate speedy action and that the total pendency (reported as 8514) reflects a systemic backlog deserving court intervention.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents contend that disposal cannot be rushed out of turn; the Land Tribunal must follow the seniority principle and adhere to legal procedures. They point to the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri, including obtaining village reports via Village Officers and prioritizing senior-citizen cases; they note a substantial pendency (8514 cases) and argue for a structured, lawful disposal process rather than ad hoc prioritization. The Government Pleader highlights the necessity of following the GO 09/2018 RD and ensuring compliance with statutory timelines, while preserving the integrity of the Tribunal’s process and not undermining due process or established procedures.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another | W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 | Positive | Cited repeatedly as the controlling authority for expeditious disposal and seniority-based management of Land Tribunal cases; the court directs follow-on actions per Narayanan Namboodiri. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Jabir v. Land Tribunal (Devaswom), Malappuram and Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Malappuram and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.