High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; Ext.P3 set aside to ...

Indira Charitable Trust v. State of Kerala and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.18264 of 2020 (G)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2020-09-11
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of in part: Ext.P3 order is set aside to the extent of denying the Diploma in Automotive Engineering for the academic year 2020-21. The 2nd and 3rd respondents are directed to reconsider the application for approval/affiliation to Diploma in Automobile Engineering with an intake of 60 for the academic year 2020-21, in light of AICTE approval Ext.P2 and the guidance in Ext.P6, and to pass a fresh decision expeditiously, at any rate by 15.09.2020.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; Ext.P3 set aside to the extent of denial; AICTE and State Board directed to reconsider the applicant's request for approval/affiliation for Diploma in Automobile Engineering for 2020-21, with intake 60, by 15.09.2020.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Indira Charitable Trust

Respondents

  • State of Kerala
  • Director of Technical Education
  • State Board of Technical Education
  • All India Council for Technical Education

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Kuriān George Kannantanam (Sr.)
  • • Tony George Kannantanam
  • • Sivashankar Panicker

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sajith Kumar V., SC, AICTE
  • • Sunil Nath, Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Indira Charitable Trust, an educational agency running Rajadhani Institute of Engineering and Technology in Trivandrum, challenged Ext.P3 (dated 21.08.2020) of the Director of Technical Education, the Member Secretary of the State Board of Technical Education, which refused provisional affiliation for a Diploma programme in Automobile Engineering on the ground that the institute did not offer the related UG program (Automobile Engineering). AICTE had earlier granted Ext.P2 approving the institution, and Ext.P6 clarified that an institute is eligible to apply for an additional level—Diploma—provided it already offers the same programme at the UG level or vice versa. The petitioner sought quashing of Ext.P3 and a mandamus directing the authorities to grant approval/affiliation for the Diploma in Automobile Engineering for the academic year 2020-21, so that admissions could proceed. The court examined AICTE Regulation 2020–21, particularly Clause 2.9.1 on starting new programmes, and the definitions of 'course', 'level', and 'programme' in Clauses 2.21, 2.34, 2.40, along with the State Board Regulations Revision-2015. It cited Jai Bharath College of Management and Engineering Technology v. State of Kerala to underscore AICTE’s supervisory authority and the primacy of AICTE regime. The observations culminated in setting aside Ext.P3 to the extent of denial and directing 2nd and 3rd respondents to reconsider the request for AICTE approval/affiliation for 2020-21, with intake of 60, by 15.09.2020.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaAll India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987All India Council for Technical Education Regulations 2020 (Grant of Approvals for Technical Institutions)AICTE Approval Process Handbook 2020-21Rules and Regulations for the Conduct of Diploma Programmes in Engineering/Technology/Commercial Practice/Management in the Polytechnic Colleges recognised by the State Board of Technical Education, Kerala (Revision-2015)Clause 2.9 of AICTE Approval Process Handbook - 2020-21Clause 2.9.1 (eligibility)Clause 2.21 (definition of 'course')Clause 2.34 (definition of 'level')Clause 2.40 (definition of 'programme')Clause 1.3 (definition of 'course' in State Regulations)Clause 1.10 (definition of 'programme' in State Regulations)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Supremacy of Union law over State law (Articles 245 and 246 of the Constitution)
  • AICTE regulations constitute a self-contained code superior to state/university laws (as held in Jai Bharath College of Management and Engineering Technology v. State of Kerala)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends Ext.P3 denying provisional affiliation for Diploma in Automobile Engineering is contrary to AICTE approval Ext.P2 and the clarificatory Ext.P6, which together show eligibility for an additional level provided the program exists at UG level or vice versa. It argues AICTE Handbook 2020-21, especially Clause 2.9.1, permits existing institutions to start Diploma-level programs if the institution already offers the same program at UG level, and that Ext.P6 clarifications override conflicting state regulations. The petitioner seeks quashing of Ext.P3 and a mandamus to grant approval/affiliation for the 2020-21 academic year to admit 60 students, relying on AICTE’s supremacy and the hierarchical scheme that places AICTE regulations above state norms. It places reliance on Jai Bharath to assert AICTE’s plenary power to grant approvals.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that the institution does not offer the UG Automobile Engineering program; thus, Clause 2.9.1 requires the institution to be in existence with the same program at UG or diploma level before starting a new Diploma program. The State Board’s Regulations (Revision-2015) define essential terms and regulate the process; AICTE 2020 Handbook provisions should be read in light of both AICTE Act and Regulations, but cannot override the specific eligibility criteria. They maintain Ext.P3 reflects proper application of the rules and that AICTE’s clarifications cannot override the express regulatory framework. They argue for maintaining standards and that the Division Bench Jai Bharath decision cannot nullify the state’s regulatory role.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Jai Bharath College of Management and Engineering Technology v. State of Kerala and othersW.A.No.1073 of 2020PositiveThe Division Bench held that AICTE is empowered to grant approvals under its regulations, creating a code superior to state laws; AICTE regime governs approvals and is binding, supporting the petitioner's reliance on AICTE authority.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Indira Charitable Trust v. State of Kerala and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 20TH BHADRA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.18264 OF 2020(G)** ## **PETITIONER:** **INDIRA CHARITABLE TRUST,** **REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, RAJADHANI COMPLEX, EAST FORT, TRIVANDRUM-695023. BY ADVS.** **SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.) SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM SHRI.SIVASHANKAR PANICKER** ## **RESPONDENTS:** **1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695001.** **2 THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, PADMAVILASOM STREET, FORT.P.O., TRIVANDRUM-695023. 3 STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, REPRESENTED BY THE MEMBER SECRETARY, THE DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, TRIVANDRUM-695001. 4 ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, NELSON MANDELA MARG, VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI-110070.** **R1-3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **R4 BY ADV. SHRI.SAJITH KUMAR V., SC, ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION - AICTE SRI KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR)FOR PETITIONER ; SRI SUNIL NATH -GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.09.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** -2- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner, which is an educational agency, which runs an Engineering College, namely, Rajadhani Institute of Engineering and Technology in Thiruvananthapuram, in SelfFinancing Sector, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P3 order dated 21.03.2020 of the 2[nd] respondent the Director of Educational Education, who is the Member Secretary of the 3[rd] respondent State Board of Technical Education, whereby the application made by the petitioner for grant of provisional affiliation for the Diploma programme in Automobile Engineering, on the strength of Ext.P2 approval granted by the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), with an annual intake of 60, stands rejected on the ground that Automotive Engineering course is not conducted in the petitioner's institution at UG level. Therefore, the request for affiliation of the Diploma programme in Automotive Engineering as an additional level cannot be considered. 2. In Ext.P3 order the 2[nd] respondent has referred to -3- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 Clause 2.9.1 of the Admission Process Handbook 2020-21 of the AICTE. The petitioner obtained Ext.P6 clarification from AICTE, in which it is stated that, an institute is eligible to apply for an additional level - Diploma – provided the institute is already offering the same program in the UG level or viceversa. Thereafter, the petitioner moved this Court in this writ petition, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P3 order insofar as it has declined approval for the Diploma programme in Automobile Engineering; and a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 2 and 3 to grant approval/affiliation to Diploma in Automobile Engineering in the petitioner's college, so as to enable it to effect admissions for the academic year 2020-21. 3. On 07.09.2020, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Senior Government Pleader sought time to get instructions from respondents 2 and 3 and the learned Standing Counsel for AICTE sought time to get instruction from the 4[th] respondent. 4. The written instructions received from the 2[nd] -4- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 respondent is placed on record along with a memo filed by the learned Special Government Pleader dated 11.09.2020, in which the provisions under the Rules and Regulations for the Conduct of Diploma Programmes in Engineering/Technology/ Commercial Practice/Management in the Polytechnic Colleges recognised by the State Board of Technical Education, Kerala (Revision-2015) is relied on. As per Clause 1.3 'course' means the study of an individual subject in a particular semester (traditionally referred to as a subject/paper) which shall include, theory, practical, fieldwork, project work, etc. As per Clause 1.10, 'programme' means the entire course of study and examinations (traditionally referred to as course) prescribed for the same leading to the award of Diploma. Relying on Clause 1.10 and 1.3 of the State Regulations, and also Clause 2.9.1 of AICTE Approval Process Hand Book 202021, the 3[rd] respondent took a decision not to grant affiliation to the Automobile Engineering Diploma in the petitioner's college, as there is no such programme in UG level. 5. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 -5- the learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3 and also the learned Standing Counsel for the 4[th] respondent AICTE. 6. Clause 2.9 of the All India Council for Technical Education Approval Process Handbook - 2020-21 deals with starting of new programme/level in the existing institutions. Clause 2.9.1 deals with requirements and eligibility. Subclause (a) of Clause 2.9.1 reads thus: “a. The existing Institutions seeking approval to start new Programme/Level shall apply on AICTE Web-Portal along with the Extension of Approval for the existing Progamme(s) and Course(s) with the additional documents as per Appendix 17 of the Approval Process Handbook. However, the Institutions shall be permitted to apply for the same only after one batch of students pass out. New Course(s) in under Graduate Degree in Engineering and Technology shall be permissible in EMERGING AREAS ONLY. Existing Institutions shall be permitted to start Degree/ Diploma Level in Engineering and Technology/Pharmacy Programme, ONLY if the Institution is already conducting Diploma/Degree Level in the same.” 7. Clause 2.21 of the All India Council for Technical -6- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 Education (Grant of Approval for Technical Institutions) Regulations 2020, defines the term 'course' to mean one of the branches of learning in a Programme such as Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, etc. Clause 2.34 defines the term 'level', to mean Diploma, Post Diploma Certificate, Under Graduate Degree, Post Graduate Diploma and Post Graduate Degree Programmes. Clause 2.40 defines the term 'programme' to mean the field of Technical Education, i.e., Engineering and Technology, Pharmacy, Architecture and Planning, Applied Arts, Crafts and Design, Hotel Management and Catering Technology, MCA, Management (PGCM/PGDM/MBA) and such other Programmes/ areas as notified by AICTE Act, 1987. 8. A combined reading of clauses 2.21, 2.34 and 2.40 of the AICTE Regulations, 2020 and also the provisions in Clause 2.9.1 of the AICTE Approval Process Handbook 202021 would make it explicitly clear that an existing Technical Institution can be permitted to start Diploma level in Engineering and Technology programme, if that institution is -7- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 already offering Engineering and Technology programme in Degree level. 9. In **Jai Bharath College of Management and Engineering Technology v. State of Kerala and others [Judgment dated 08.09.2020 in W.A.No.1073 of 2020 and connected cases]** a Division Bench of this Court held that in the light of the All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987, All India Council for Technical Education (Grant of Approvals for Technical Institutions) Regulations 2020, and the Approval Process Hand Book issued by the AICTE for the period 2020-21, the AICTE was entitled to take a decision in the matter of grant of approval, since it is vested with ample powers under law to do so. The AICTE Act, the AICTE Regulations, 2020 and the Approval Process Hand Book constituted in accordance with the powers conferred under the Regulations are, in all respects, a code by itself for conduct of its to undertake its activities, and they are also superior to the laws of the University in question as is held by the Apex Court. Moreover, Articles 245 and 246 of the Constitution of -8- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 India, in unequivocal terms, specify that when there is a conflict by and between any legislation of the Union and the State, the laws made by the Union in its absolute domain would be superior in all respects and the State has no power to interfere with the jurisdiction so exercised by the Union. 10. In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court, I find absolutely no merit in the contention raised by the learned Special Government Pleader, placing reliance on the Rules and Regulations framed by the 3[rd] respondent State Board of Technical Education. In view of the approval granted by AICTE in Ext.P2 and also the clarification issued by the AICTE in Ext.P6 that an institute is eligible to apply for additional level - diploma - provided the institute is already offering the same programme in UG level and viceversa, the reasoning of the 2[nd] respondent in Ext.P3 order, in sor far as rejection of the application made by the petitioner for provisional affiliation to Diploma in Automobile Engineering for the academic year 2020-21 cannot be sustained in law. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by setting -9- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 aside Ext.P3 order dated 21.08.2020 of the 2[nd] respondent to the above extent and by directing respondents 2 and 3 to reconsider the request made by the petitioner for grant of approval/affiliation to Diploma in Automobile Engineer in its college for the academic year 2020-21, with an annual intake of 60, in terms of the approval granted by the AICTE in Ext.P2, taking note of the law laid down in this judgment, and take an appropriate decision, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, on or before 15.09.2020. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE** das -10- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.9.2019 ISSUED FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4.7.2020 ISSUED BY THE ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION.** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.8.2020 ISSUED FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 4.2.2020 ISSUED FROM THE ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION.** **EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.8.2020 TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE E.MAIL DATED 27.8.2020 SENT BY THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE AICTE.** **EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PRINT OUT OF THE E.MAIL 28.8.2020.**