High Court of KeralaDivision BenchCRP disposed of with directions to cure defects...

HARIS KILACHA VALAPPIL v. Kadamakodu Kunnathu Mahal Muslim Jama-ath Committee and others

Case / Petition Number:CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C.S.Dias
  • Basant Balaji
Judgment Date
2022-04-22
Court Decision / Holding
CRP disposed of with the observation that the petitioners can present the plaint before the Wakf Tribunal after curing the defects within three weeks from today; the Wakf Tribunal can proceed with the plaint once defects are cured. The order of return is not final on maintainability and the matter may be pursued before the Wakf Tribunal subject to the cure of defects.
Final Disposition
CRP disposed of with directions to cure defects and enable the plaint to be represented before the Wakf Tribunal within three weeks from today; the matter to proceed before the Wakf Tribunal thereafter.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • HARIS KILACHA VALAPPIL

Respondents

  • KADAMKODU KUNNATHU MAHAL MUSLIM JAMA-ATH COMMITTEE
  • ABDUL KHADER
  • VATTATHU PUTHIYAPURAYIL MUHAMMED KUTTY
  • CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD
  • PANAKKADA ALEEMA
  • PANAKKADA SAABIRA
  • PANAKKADA ASMA
  • PANAKKADA ALI
  • PANAKKADA NAFEESA
  • PANAKKADA SEENATH
  • PANAKKADA JUBAIRIYA
  • VAARATHU VEETTIL THAYYIL VALAPPIL MARJANA
  • VAARATHU VEETTIL THAYYIL VALAPPIL UVAYS
  • VAARATHU THBAYYIL VALAPPIL SAFIYA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ABDUUL SALEEM
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ALEEMA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NAZEERA
  • NARAMALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL MOOSSA
  • VAARATHE VEETTIL THAYYILE VALAPPIL FAYISA
  • MUHAMMED KUTTY
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL KUNHAMINA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NASEEMA
  • NARANGALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SAREENA
  • NARANGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL KHADEEJA
  • NARANGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL ABDUL KHADER
  • KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ASIYA
  • PONNANGAYI AREEKKAL MAHAROOF
  • PANAKKADA MARIYAM
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL FOUZIA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SAJAHAN
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ASLAM
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ASHKAR ALI
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL FIROZ
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NAJMA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SABEENA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL MUHAMMED SAFWAN
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL FATHIMATHUL SHADHA
  • ARAKKAL KAMAAL
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL HAZIRA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ABDURAHIMAN
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ARSHANA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL AMEERA
  • NARAMKALIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL RAJA (MINOR)
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL RISWAN(MINOR)
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL AADHAM (MINOR)
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL MUBAIJ
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL MUBASHEER
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NABEELA
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NIHAS
  • NARANGALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL SALMAN (MINOR)
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SUHA (MINOR)
  • NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL UMAYIR (MINOR)
  • SABEENA
  • NASRIYA
  • MUHAMMED NABEEL (MINOR)
  • FATHIMA (MINOR)
  • THAMEEM (MINOR)
  • PANAKKADA JAABIR (ADV JAMSHEED HAFIZ)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • K.M.Firoz
  • • M.ShaJna

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Jamsheed Hafiz

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petition is CRP(WAKF) No. 19 of 2022, arising from O.S. No.141 of 2019 before the Wakf Tribunal, Kozhikode, challenging the maintainability of a suit filed for a mandatory injunction to reclaim vacant possession of a Wakf property and to secure consequential injunction. The Wakf Tribunal had held the suit not maintainable under the Wakf Act, and by an order dated 8 October 2021, returned the plaint for non-compliance with Order VII Rule 10 CPC. The petitioner contends that the dispute relates to Wakf and that the Wakf Tribunal has jurisdiction to adjudicate all disputes, questions or other matters relating to a Wakf or Wakf property, including the questions under Sections 6(1) and 7(1), and that the second limb of Section 85 covers matters to be determined by the Tribunal. Citing Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari (2021) 6 KLT 482 (SC), he argues that the Tribunal’s jurisdiction extends to the specified questions and other Wakf-related matters, and that the order is bad in law and should be set aside and the plaint accepted. The Court, after noting the Tribunal’s focus on noncompliance and the settled position on maintainability under Section 83 Wakf Act, disposes of the CRP with a direction that the petitioners may present the plaint before the Wakf Tribunal after curing defects within three weeks from today.

Provisions of Law Cited

Wakf ActWakf RulesSection 6(1) Wakf ActSection 7(1) Wakf ActSection 83 Wakf ActSection 85 Wakf ActOrder VII Rule 10 CPC

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Doctrine: Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal to adjudicate disputes relating to Wakf or Wakf property under Section 85(1) and the two questions under Section 6(1) and 7(1).
  • Doctrine: Two limbs of Section 85 — first limb covers disputes relating to waqf or waqf property; second limb covers other matters which the Act requires the Tribunal to determine.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that the Wakf Tribunal has jurisdiction to adjudicate all disputes, questions or other matters relating to a Wakf or Wakf property under the Wakf Act, including the two questions mentioned in Sections 6(1) and 7(1), and that the Tribunal is empowered to decide such issues. He relies on Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari (2021) 6 KLT 482 (SC) to argue that the words in Section 85(1) create jurisdiction for the Tribunal and that the second limb covers other matters under the Act. He prays that the order of the Wakf Tribunal returning the plaint be set aside and that the plaint be accepted after curing defects. The petition further asserts that maintainability under Section 83 Wakf Act precedes any other consideration and that the Tribunal should entertain the plaint upon curing defects within a specified period.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari2021(6) KLT 482 (SC)PositiveCited to support the interpretation that Section 85(1) grants authority to the Wakf Tribunal to adjudicate disputes relating to a waqf or wakf property, including the two questions under Sections 6(1) and 7(1).

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against HARIS KILACHA VALAPPIL v. Kadamakodu Kunnathu Mahal Muslim Jama-ath Committee and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS ``` ## **`&`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI`** ``` FRIDAY, THE 22[ND] DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 2ND VAISAKHA, 1944 ``` ## **`CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022`** ``` WOS 141/2019 OF WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` HARIS KILACHA VALAPPIL,AGED 51 YEARS S/O. ABDUL KHADER A.T., KILACHA VALAPPIL KADAMAKODU, VARAM POST, KANNUR., PIN - 670594 BY ADVS.K.M.FIROZ/M.SHAJNA ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** - `1 KADAMKODU KUNNATHU MAHAL MUSLIM JAMA-ATH COMMITTEE AGED 54 YEARS, REP.BY. ITS SECRATRARY, NARANKAL MUNAMBATH, ABDUL KHADER AGED 54 YEARS,S/O.MOOSSAN, PUTHIYAPURAYIL HOUSE, KADANGODE VARAM.P.O,KANNUR., PIN - 670594` - `2 ABDUL KHADER,AGED 54 YEARS,S/O. MOOSSAN, PUTHIYAPURAYIL HOUSE, KADANKODE VARAM.P.O,KANNUR,670594 SECRATRARY, KADAMKODE KUNNATH MAHAL MUSLIM JAMAATH COMMITTEE KADMKODE, P.O VARAM,KANNUR.PIN - 670594` - `3 VATTATHU PUTHIYAPURAYIL MUHAMMED KUTTY,AGED 68 YEARS,S/O.ABDUL KHADER, DHARUSSALAM, AAYANGEEL HOUSE, PRESIDENT KADAMKODE KUNNATH MAHAL MUSLIM JAMAATH COMMITTEE KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `4 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD V.I.P ROAD, KALOOR, COCHIN, PIN - 682017` - `5 PANAKKADA ALEEMA,AGED 38 YEARS,D/O NARANGALLIL PALLINTEVIDA ABDUL KHADER, W/O K P KUNHIMOITHEEN, KURUKKANTEVIDE HOUSE, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `6 PANAKKADA SAABIRA,AGED 35 YEARS D/O NARANGALLIL PALLINTEVIDA ABDUL KHADER, W/O HANEEFA KURUKKANTEVIDE HOUSE, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` ``` CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022 ``` -2- - `7 PANAKKADA ASMA,AGED 69 YEARS,D/O PAKKAR PALLINTEVIDA W/ONARANGALLIL PALLINTAVIDE ABDUL KHADER KURUKKANTEVIDE HOUSE, KADANGODE, P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `8 PANAKKADA ALI,AGED 50 YEARS,D/O NARANGALLIL PALLINTAVIDE ABDUL KHADER KURUKKANTEVIDE HOUSE, KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `9 PANAKKADA NAFEESA,AGED 48 YEARS,D/O O NARANGALLIL PALLINTAVIDE ABDUL KHADER W/O ABOOBACKER PALLINTAVIDE DARULNOOR, KADAMKODE P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `10 PANAKKADA SEENATH,AGED 41 YEARS,D/O O NARANGALLIL PALLINTAVIDE ABDUL KHADER KURUKKANTEVIDE HOUSE, KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `11 PANAKKADA JUBAIRIYA,AGED 38 YEARS,D/O NARANGALLIL PALLINTAVIDE ABDUL KHADER W/O HUSSAIN, KURUKKANTAVIDE HOUSE KADANGODE, P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `12 VAARATHU VEETTIL THAYYIL VALAPPIL MARJANA,AGED 45 YEARS,D/O VATTATH MOOSAKKUTTY HAJI W/O MUHAMMED, AYISHA MANZIL, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `13 VAARATHU VEETTIL THAYYIL VALAPPIL UVAYS,AGED 25 YEARS,S/O MUHAMMED, AYISHA MANZIL, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `14 VAARATHU VEETTIL THBAYYIL VALAPPIL SAFIYA AGED 17 YEARS,D/O MUHAMMED, AYISHA MANZIL, KADAMKODE P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `15 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ABDUUL SALEEM,AGED 37 YEARS,S/O ARAKKAL KAMAL, BADHRIYA MANZIL KADAMKODE P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `16 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ALEEMA,AGED 64 YEARS,D/O MAMU, PULLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `17 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NAZEERA,AGED 38 YEARS,D/O ABDUL KHADER, HARIS MANZIL, CHATHURAKINAR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `18 NARAMALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL MOOSSA S/O ARAKKAL MOIDEEN, PALLIKULATHINTE VEEDU. KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` ## **`CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022`** -3- - `19 VAARATHE VEETTIL THAYYILE VALAPPIL FAYISA AGED 28 YEARS,D/O MUHAMMED V K W/O MUHAMMED SHAJEEL.K.C, AYISHA MANZIL, KADANGODE, P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `20 VAARATHE VEETTIL THAYYIL VALAPPIL MUHAMMED KUTTY AGED 50 YEARS,S/O VATTATH MOOSAKUTTY HAJI AYISHA MANZIL, KADAMKODE P.O VARAM,KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `21 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL KUNHAMINA,AGED 56 YEARS,D/O MAMU,HAJIRA MANZIL, CHATHURAKKINAR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `22 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NASEEMA,AGED 48 YEARS,D/O ASAINAR.P.C,CHOOLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `23 NARANGALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL, PUTHIYA PURAYIL SAREENA,AGED 38 YEARS,D/O ASAINAR.P.C ,CHOOLERIYIL HOUSE,KADAMKKODE,P.0 VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `24 NARANGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL, PUTHIYAPURAYIL KHADEEJA,AGED 57 YEARS,D/O MOIDEEN KOLOTH, W/O ABDULLA KOLOTH CHOOLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAKKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `25 NARANGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL, PUTHIYAPURAYIL ABDUL KHADER,AGED 68 YEARS,S/O MOIDEEN,ARAKKAL ANSARI MAHAL ELAYAVOOR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `26 KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ASIYA D/O MAMU, HARIES MANZIL, CHATHURAKKINAR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `27 PONNANGAYI AREEKKAL MAHAROOF,AGED 37 YEARS S/O ABDULLA, ARIFAS KADANGODE P.O VARAM KANNUR-, PIN - 670594` - `28 PANANKKADA MARIYAM,AGED 38 YEARS,D/O NARANGALIL PALLINTAVIDE ABDUL KHADER KURUKKANTAVIDE HOUSE KADAMGODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `29 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL FOUZIA,AGED 40 YEARS,D/O KAMAL, ARAKAKL BADRIYA MANSIL, KADAKKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `30 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SAJAHAN,AGED 38 YEARS,S/O KAMAL, ARAKKAL BADRIYA MANSIL, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `31 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ASLAM,AGED 36 YEARS,S/O KAMAL, ARAKKAL BADRIYA MANSIL, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` ## **`CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022`** -4- |`32`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| |---|---| ||`ASHKAR ALI,AGED 31 YEARS,S/O KAMAL, ARAKKAL`| ||`BADRIYA MANSIL, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN -`| ||`670594`| |`33`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL FIROZ`| ||`AGED 29 YEARS,S/O KAMAL, ARAKKAL BADRIYA MANSIL,`| ||`KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`34`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NAJMA`| ||`AGED 27 YEARS,D/O MUSTHAFA, W/O.ALTHAF WHITE HOUSE`| ||`PALLIPOYIL MAVVANJERI P.O, PIN - 670613`| |`35`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`SABEENA,AGED 24 YEARS,D/O KAMAL, ARAKKAL BADRIYA`| ||`MANSIL, KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`36`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`MUHAMMED SAFWAN,AGED 19 YEARS,S/O SHUKOOR, BADRIYA`| ||`MANSIL, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`37`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`FATHIMATHUL SHADHA,AGED 18 YEARS,D / O SHUKOOR,`| ||`BADRIYA MANSIL, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN -`| ||`670594`| |`38`|`ARAKKAL KAMAAL,S/O MOIDEEN, BADARIYYA MANZIL,`| ||`KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`39`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`HAJARA,, D/O ABDUL SATHAR, VAJARA MANZIL`| ||`CHATHURAKINAR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`40`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`ABDURAHIMAN,S/O ABDUL SATHAR, HAJARA MANZIL`| ||`CHATHURAKINAR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`41`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`ARSHANA,D/O ABDUL SATHAR, VAJARA MANZIL`| ||`CHATHURAKINAR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`42`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`AMEERA,D/O ABDUL SATHAR,V AJARA MANZIL`| ||`CHATHURAKINAR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`43`|`NARAMKALIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL RAJA`| ||`(MINOR) D/O ABDUL RASHEED, HAJARA MANZIL,`| ||`CHATHURAKINAR, P.O VARAM, KANNUR-670590`| ||`REPRESENTED. BY GUARDIAN UMMA NARAMKALLIL`| ||`KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL HAJARA, AGED 38`| ||`D/O ABDUL SATHAR, HAJARA MANZIL CHATHURAKINAR,P.O`| ||`VARAM KANNUR-670594, PIN - 670594`| ``` CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022 ``` -5- - `44 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL RISWAN(MINOR),AGED 12 YEARS,S/O ABDUL RASHEED, REPRE. BY GUARDIAN UMMA NARENGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL HAJARA AGE 35 D/O ABDUL SATHAR HAJARA MANZIL CHATHURAKINAR,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `45 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL AADHAM (MINOR),AGED 2 YEARS,S/O ASLAM, HAJARA MANZIL REPRE.BY GUARDIAN UMMA NARENGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL ARSHANA AGED 24 D/O ABDUL SATHAR HAJARA MANZIL CHATHURAKINAR, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `46 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL MUBAIJ,AGED 28 YEARS,S/O MUSTHAFA,PULLERIYIL HOUSE KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `47 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL MUBASHEER,AGED 25 YEARS,S/O MUSTHAFA,PULLERIYIL HOUSE KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `48 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NABEELA,AGED 28 YEARS,D/O MUSTHAFA,PULLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `49 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL NIHAS AGED 24 YEARS,S/O MUSTHAFA, PULLERIYIL HOUSE KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `50 NARANGALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL SALMAN (MINOR),AGED 15 YEARS,S/O MUHAMMED, REPRE.BY GUARDIAN, UMMA NARENGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SAREENA AGED 38 YEARS D/O ASAINAR.P.C PULLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `51 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SUHA (MINOR),AGED 13 YEARS,D/O MUHAMMED KUTTI, REPRE.BY GUARDIAN UMMA NARENGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SAREENA AGED 38 YEARS D/O ASAINAR. PULLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAKKODE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` - `52 NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL UMAYIR (MINOR),AGED 3 YEARS,S/O MUHAMMED KUTTI, REPRE.BY GUARDIAN UMMA NARENGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SAREENA AGED 38 YEARS W/O ASAINAR.P.C, PULLERIYIL HOUSE, P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594` ``` CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022 ``` -6- |`53`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| |---|---| ||`SABEENA,AGED 33 YEARS,D/O ABDULLA KOLOTH`| ||`PULLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAKMODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN`| ||`- 670594`| |`54`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`NASRIYA,AGED 26 YEARS,D/O ABDULLAKOLOT PULLERIYIL`| ||`HOUSE, KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`55`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`MUHAMMED NABEEL (MINOR),AGED 14 YEARS`| ||`S/O THAJUDHEEN, REPRE. BY GUARDIAN UMMA`| ||`NARENGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`SABEENA AGED 33 YEARS D/O ABDULLA KOLOTH`| ||`PULLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAMKODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN`| ||`- 670594`| |`56`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`FATHIMA (MINOR),AGED 11 YEARS,D/O THAJUDHEEN,`| ||`REPRE.BY GUARDIAN UMMA NARENGALLIL KURIKKALECHALIL`| ||`PUTHIYA PURAYIL SABEENA AGED 33 YEARS D/O ABDULLA`| ||`KOLOTH PULLERIYIL HOUSE, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM`| ||`KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`57`|`NARAMKALLIL KURIKKALE CHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL`| ||`THAMEEM (MAINOR),AGED 3 YEARS,S/O THAJUDHEEN,`| ||`REPRE. BY GUARDIAN UMMA NARENGALLIL`| ||`KURIKKALECHALIL PUTHIYA PURAYIL SABEENA AGED 33`| ||`YEARS D/O ABDULLA KOLOTH PULLERIYIL HOUSE,`| ||`KADAMODE,P.O VARAM KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| |`58`|`PANAKKADA JAABIR,S/O.ABDUL KHADER, AGED 28`| ||`YEARS,KURIKKANTEVIDDA VEEDU, KADAMKODE, P.O VARAM`| ||`KANNUR, PIN - 670594`| ||`BY ADV JAMSHEED HAFIZ`| ``` THIS CRP (WAKF ACT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022 ``` -7- ## **C.S.DIAS** ## **& BASANT BALAJI, JJ.** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - CRP(WAKF) NO.19 OF 2022 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ## **ORDER** (Dated this the 22[nd] day of April 2022) ## Basant Balaji J., The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S. No.141 of 2019 on the files of the Wakf Tribunal, Kozhikode and the respondents are the defendants therein. 2. The suit was filed for mandatory injunction directing respondent Nos.5 to 19 to give vacant possession of plaint schedule property and consequential injunction. 3. Before the Wakf Tribunal, the question of ``` CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022 ``` -8- maintainability came up for consideration and considering the Wakf Act and Rules, the Tribunal held that the suit is not maintainable. Thereafter, the Wakf Tribunal, as per order dated 8.10.2021, returned the plaint for noncompliance of Order VII Rule 10 CPC. 4. It was contended that the dispute in the present case relates to a Wakf and the Wakf Tribunal can decide all disputes, questions or other matters relating to a Wakf or Wakf property. The question as to whether the suit property is a Wakf property or not, is also disputed. The honourable Apex Court in **Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari [2021(6) KLT 482 (SC)]** held that the words “any dispute, question or other matter relating to any waqf or waqf property”, used in the first limb of Section 85, provide a clear indication ``` CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022 ``` that the Tribunal would have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon any dispute and answer any question relating to a waqf or waqf property, including the two questions mentioned in Sections 6(1) and 7(1). The words in the second limb of Section 85 namely, “other matter which is required by or under this Act to be determined by a Tribunal”, seek to cover matters which have no relevance to the two questions covered by Section 6(1) and 7(1). Hence, he prayed that the order passed by the Wakf Tribunal is bad in law and the same has to be set aside and direction to be issued to the Tribunal to accept the plaint. 5. On going through the impugned order, it is seen that the Tribunal has only returned the plaint for noncompliance of Order VII Rule 10 CPC. In view of the settled position of law regarding the maintainability of ``` CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022 ``` -10- petition under Section 83 of the Wakf Act before the Wakf Tribunal, we are of the opinion that the petitioners can represent the plaint before the Wakf Tribunal after curing the defects, if any, within a period of three weeks from today. C.R.P. is disposed of with the above observations. **sd C.S.DIAS, JUDGE** **sd** **BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE** _dl/_ ``` CRP(WAKF) NO. 19 OF 2022 ``` -11- ## **`APPENDIX OF CRP(WAKF) 19/2022`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 ``` ``` A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22-2- 2022 IN CRP (WAKF) NO 33 OF 2021) PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA ```