High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions that Land Tribunal ...

Gopidas K. v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal, Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-02-10
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M. No.876/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions that Land Tribunal Palakkad dispose of S.M.No.876/2020 in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri guidelines; emphasize seniority-based disposal and expedite proceedings; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • GOPIDAS K., Aged 70 years, S/O Late Kuttikrishnan, Kappil House, Kayaramkode, Mundur I Village, Palakkad Taluk, Palakkad-678001

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar, (L.R.) Land Tribunal, Palakkad-678 001
  • The Village Officer Mundur- I Village, Palakkad-678 592

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.A.R.GANGADAS

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges a suo motu proceeding initiated by the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petitioner, a 70-year-old senior citizen named Gopidas K., seeks expeditious disposal of S.M.No.876/2020 on the Land Tribunal’s file. The court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri line of decisions, noting that disposal must respect seniority and that cases involving senior citizens should be prioritized within six months, while other cases should be completed within 18 months unless stayed. It is highlighted that Village Officers can be used to obtain necessary reports to avoid delays, and that notices to landlords may be issued in a flexible manner. Given the large pendency in the Land Tribunal (3342 cases), the court directs the Tribunal to proceed strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, and to dispose of the subject matter expeditiously. The petition is allowed in part; no costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 (Kerala Government Order)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that he seeks mandamus to compel expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.876/2020 on the Land Tribunal’s file, emphasizing his status as a senior citizen (70 years) and reliance on prior directives in Narayanan Namboodiri to ensure disposal on seniority and within time limits. He argues for priority to senior citizens and for expeditious processing of the certificate of purchase under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, with reports streamlined through Village Officers to avoid delays.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents highlight the overall pendency in the Land Tribunal (3342 cases) and stress adherence to seniority in disposal. They point to the need for cooperative notice to landlords, possible use of Village Officers to obtain required reports (as per directions in Narayanan Namboodiri), and the Government’s alignment with expedited disposal for senior citizens. The respondents argue that disposal should follow established procedures and that delay can be mitigated through procedural adjustments and compliance with statutory requirements.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as controlling authority for expeditious disposal and seniority-based disposal in Land Tribunal matters; the court adopts its directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Gopidas K. v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal, Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 21ST MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **GOPIDAS K., AGED 70 YEARS S/O. LATE KUTTIKRISHNAN, KAPPIL HOUSE, KAYARAMKODE, MUNDUR I VILLAGE, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD-678 001** **BY ADV. SRI.A.R.GANGADAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (L.R.) LAND TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD-678 001 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER MUNDUR- I VILLAGE, PALAKKAD-678 592** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.876/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Palakkad under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0768 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.198/1 (old Sy.No.15/8) of Mundur-I Village in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the W.P(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G) -4- jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the W.P(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G) -5- cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending ## W.P(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G) -6- before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Mundur-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Palakkad initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.876/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 30.11.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. W.P(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G) -7- 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 70 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Palakkad is 3342. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Palakkad can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.876/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M. No.876/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.3463 OF 2021(G) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PURCHASE NO. 518/81, DATED 29.09.1981 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P2** **TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DULY PREPARED AND FORWARDED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MUNDUR I VILLAGE, FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF PURCHASE, DATED 04.11.2020.** ## **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN SM NO. 876/2020 DATED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN SM NO. 876/2020 DATED 30.11.2020 TO THE PETITIONER.**