Fr. Mathew Thekkekkulam Infant Jesus Church v State of Kerala & Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
- Judgment Date
- 2022-10-07
- Court Decision / Holding
- The writ petition (W.P.(C).No.11767 of 2011) is disposed of. The court notes that the unit of the 10th respondent is not functioning, and if any surviving grievance remains, the petitioners may approach the competent authority in accordance with law. The petition is accordingly closed, with a directive that the petitioners may pursue remedies through the proper authorities if necessary.
- Final Disposition
- Writ petition disposed of; matter closed with directions to approach authorities if grievances persist; unit of the 10th respondent not functioning.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- FR.MATHEW THEKKEKKULAM INFANT JESUS CHURCH, VANIYAPPARA, CHARAL, KANNUR DISTRICT
- DAISY MANI, THARAPPEL HOUSE CHARAL P.O., VANIYAPPARA, KANNUR DISTRICT
- THOMAS THOTTATHIL S/O.SEBASTIAN, RANDAMKADAVU P.O., KILIYANTHARA VIA, KANNUR DISTRICT
- MICHAEL THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS AGED 45 YEARS, PADAVIL HOUSE, RANDAMKADAVU P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT
- SHAJU K.JOSE, S/O.JOSE AGED 31 YEARS, KAYYALAKKAL HOUSE, RANDAMKADAVU P.O., KILIYANTHARA (VIA)
Respondents
- STATE OF KERALA & ORS. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR
- THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT
- THE GEOLOGIST KANNUR
- THE D.F.O. KANNUR
- THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH KANNUR
- THE AYYANKUNNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH
- THE REGIONAL ENGINEER KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, KANNUR
- M/S.KANNUR DISTRICT BLACK ROCK CRUSHERS AND SAND MAKING INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
- P.USMAN, PROPRIETOR CRESCENT STONE CRUSHER AND HOLLOW BRICKS
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • SRI.GEORGE THOMAS (MEVADA)(SR.)
- • SRI.MANU GEORGE KURUVILLA
- • SMT.RINU JOSE
Counsels for Respondents
- • JUSTIN JACOB, SR.GP
- • SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH
- • SRI.CIBI THOMAS
- • SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER
- • SRI.K.V.SOHAN
- • SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ petition (W.P.(C). No. 11767 of 2011) was filed by Fr. Mathew Thekkekkulam Infant Jesus Church, Daisy Mani, Thomas Thottathil, Michael Thomas, and Shaju K. Jose seeking protection of a region in Kannur district allegedly affected by indiscriminate mining. The petition prayed for mandamus or similar relief to implement the recommendations in Ext. P1 and to direct the subordinate officers accordingly to protect the area; to direct the District Collector to take immediate action on Exts. P3 and P4 after hearing the petitioners; to restrain the 7th respondent from granting or renewing quarry licenses in the Ext. P1 area; and to compel respondents 2–5 to file a report showing actions taken on Ext. P1 and the reasons for issuing quarry permits post-2007. The respondents include the State of Kerala and several statutory authorities, along with private quarry operators. During proceedings, it was stated that the unit of the 10th respondent is not functioning presently, leading the court to note that if any grievance remains, the petitioners may approach the competent authority in accordance with law. Based on these developments, the court disposed of the writ petition, closing the matter with a direction that petitioners may pursue redressal through appropriate authorities if required.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners seek mandamus or other appropriate writs to compel the first respondent to implement Ext.P1 recommendations and to direct subordinate officers to protect the area from indiscriminate mining. They urge that the District Collector act on Exts.P3 and P4 after hearing them, and that no new licences be granted or renewed in the Ext.P1 area. They also request reports from respondents 2–5 detailing action on Ext.P1 and the justification for post-2007 quarry permits, seeking robust protective measures for the locality and its inhabitants.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents contended that the quarry unit in question is not functioning presently, and therefore the petition raises no live grievance. They submitted that if the petitioners’ grievances persist, they may approach the competent authorities under law. The record suggests a lack of active operations at the site and a preference for remedy through appropriate administrative channels rather than direct judicial intervention at this stage.
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Fr. Mathew Thekkekkulam Infant Jesus Church v State of Kerala & Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.