Elizabeth Beena Belliappa v. State of Kerala and Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- VIJU ABRAHAM
- Judgment Date
- 2024-02-07
- Court Decision / Holding
- Writ Petition disposed of with directions to the seventh respondent to take up Ext.P7 representation and take appropriate steps as per law, considering Exts.P1 and P2 judgments of the Apex Court, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, additional respondents, and affected parties, and finalise the proceedings within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
- Final Disposition
- Writ Petition disposed of with directions to the seventh respondent to consider Ext.P7 and proceed under law, guided by Exts.P1 and P2, with hearing afforded to petitioner and affected parties; finalisation within two months from receipt of the judgment copy.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Elizabeth Beena Belliappa
Respondents
- State of Kerala represented by Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
- Secretary Public Works Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
- District Collector, Alappuzha
- Revenue Divisional Officer, Alappuzha
- Tahsildar Cherthala Taluk
- Village Officer Ezhupunna
- Executive Engineer PWD (Roads and Bridges), Cherthala
- Station House Officer Aroor Police Station
- Kanjirathinkal Devi Temple Committee represented by its Secretary
- SNDP Yogam Branch No. 671 represented by Secretary
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • V.M.Krishnakumar
- • Maya M.
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sineesh K.M. (Sineesh Madhavan)
- • Kannezhathu Madhavan
- • P. Sajeev (Perumpalam) (K/967/2007)
- • Deepa V., Government Pleader
Case Synopsis & Summary
Petitioner Elizabeth Beena Belliappa, along with her sister, owns 27 cents of land in Sy.No.158/21 in Ezhupunna Village, Cherthala Taluk, abutting the old National Highway. She challenges encroachments on the public road margins abutting her property and around a tree standing in the pavement, alleging that unauthorised activities are being carried out by respondents 9 (Kanjirathinkal Devi Temple Committee) and 10 (SNDP Yogam Branch 671). Exts.P5 and P6 pictures illustrate encroachment and the construction near the petitioner's compound wall. The petitioner prays for removal of encroachments within a time limit fixed by the Court. She relies on Ext.P1, a Supreme Court order (31-01-2018) noting encroachments and directing states to formulate a comprehensive policy for removal/relocation/regularisation of unauthorised religious constructions on public streets or places, drawing on earlier 2009–2010 directives. Ext.P2 cites Jagpal Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others (2011 KHC 4091), directing eviction schemes for illegal occupants. The petitioner seeks expeditious consideration of Exts.P7 and P8 and steps to evict encroachment, with hearing for affected parties, under the Apex Court directions cited. The Court ultimately disposes the matter with a directive to the seventh respondent to act under law, guided by Exts.P1 and P2, within two months.
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
Petitioner contends that encroachments by respondents 9 and 10 on the public road abutting her property, and around a tree near the pavement, threaten public use and safety. She relies on Supreme Court directives (Ext.P1) that unauthorised constructions on public streets or places should be removed, and on Jagpal Singh (Ext.P2) to insist on eviction schemes and prompt action. The petitioner seeks a time-bound removal/order, hearing for affected parties, and invocation of policy measures to remove/relocate/regularise encroachments. She seeks eviction of encroachers to preserve public road margins and prevent further unauthorised constructions; Ext.P7 and Ext.P8 are representations to be considered in accordance with law and prior Apex Court jurisprudence, with a view to finalising the proceedings within a short timeline.
Contentions of Respondents
Respondents' advocate(s) elaborate on compliance with existing directions and emphasize the need to apply due process under law. They rely on apex Court directives (Ext.P1) and policy-making obligations identified in prior orders to address unauthorised religious constructions. The Government Pleader assists in framing a suitable response and ensuring that the authorities consider Ext.P7 in light of Exts.P1 and P2, and afford hearing to all affected parties, including the petitioner and 9th and 10th respondents. The respondents contend that the matter requires careful, lawful action and adherence to established policy on removal/relocation/regularisation of encroachments, balancing public interest and religious rights.
Cited Precedents (4)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jagpal Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others | 2011 KHC 4091 | Positive | Cited as a controlling authority for eviction schemes and speedy eviction of illegal occupants; the court directs actions in line with this precedent. |
| Lavkush & Ors. v. State of U.P. | 2016 SCC Online 394 | Mentioned Only | Exhibit P3 cited but not necessarily relied upon for the dispositive directions; referenced as part of petition exhibits. |
| Supreme Court order in SLP No. 8519/2006 (dated 31.01.2018) | SLP No. 8519/2006 | Positive | Ext.P1; the Apex Court order is invoked to underscore policy and directions against unauthorised constructions and to guide national practice. |
| LAVKUSH & ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. | 2016 SCC Online 394 | Mentioned Only | Repeated as Exhibit P3; included as a supporting authority in the record but not central to the dispositive reasoning. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Elizabeth Beena Belliappa v. State of Kerala and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.