High Court of KeralaDivision BenchWrit petitions disposed of; impugned AFRC order...

Educare Institute of Dental Sciences Kilayamannil Campus v. Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee for Medical Education in Kerala and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.1767 of 2018 (U); WP(C).No.14036 of 2018

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • A. M. Shaffique
  • T. V. Anilkumar
Judgment Date
2019-11-05
Court Decision / Holding
In the result, the writ petitions are disposed of: Exts.P2 and P4 orders in W.P.(C)No.1767/2018 and Exts.P3 and P5 orders in W.P.(C)No.14036/2018 are set aside. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. The matter is remitted for proper adjudication before the AFRC with due process and with proper parties before it.
Final Disposition
Writ petitions disposed of; impugned AFRC orders set aside; readjudication with due process ordered; interlocutory applications closed; proper parties and merits to be reconsidered by AFRC in accordance with law.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Educare Institute of Dental Sciences Kilayamannil Campus, Chatttipparamba, Malappuram

Respondents

  • Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee for Medical Education in Kerala
  • IV Year Students of EduCare Institute of Dental Sciences, Chatttipparamba (R2) (Deleted)
  • State of Kerala represented by Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department
  • Fathima Wafada M.P Swafar (H), Karumbil, Vennioor P.O., Malappuram
  • Lubna.P Pulath(H), Pannikkottumunda, Chokkkad P.O., Malappuram
  • Safuva V.P ValiyapeediyeKKAL House, Kodakkad P.O., Malappuram
  • Aiswarya.K Kolayil House, Ayikkarappadi P.O., Malappuram
  • Sreya Jyothibas Shivam, Kodiyeri, Paral P.O., Thalassery, Kannur
  • Jidna P Panazhi House, Ramanattukara P.O., Calicut
  • Anju Soman K.M KOYAPPAMADATHIL House, Engalathupadam, Ramanattukara P.O., Kozhikode
  • Kadeeja Lubana Parcheri Parambil, Arambram, Padanilam P.O., Calicut
  • Huda Sharafim.M MaliyeKKal House, Santhi Nagar, Eangapuzha, Puthuppadi P.O., Calicut
  • Shahana Ali, Al Rayyan High School Road, Pulikkal P.O., Malappuram
  • Janisha.V Vattamanathodi House, Koottil P.O., Mankada, Malappuram
  • Fathima Fasna K.P Ittootil House, Olavattur P.O., Kondotty (Via), Malappuram
  • Shana Parveen P.K Peruvankuzhiyil House, Keerankundu, Koottilangadi P.O., Malappuram

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Smt. Santosh Mathew
  • • Sri Arun Thomas
  • • Sri Jennis Stephen
  • • Smt. Karthika Maria
  • • Smt. Maria Roy
  • • Sri Vijay V. Paul
  • • Smt. Veena Raveendran

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt. Mary Benjemin, SC
  • • Sri P.T. Abhilash
  • • Smt. P.A. Reziya
  • • Sri M.A. Asif

Case Synopsis & Summary

Educare Institute of Dental Sciences Kilayamannil Campus filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee (AFRC) for Medical Education in Kerala directing the students to pay the final year’s fee at 50% during the last six months of a 4½‑year BDS course. The petitions argue that the fee fixed by Government Order dated 12.06.2013 (Ext.P5) and the 2012 agreement (Ext.P1 in 14036) stipulates instalments over five years; since the course is 4½ years, the final year should not be charged at the full annual fee but at 50% for the last six months, as argued by the petitioners. The petition also raises procedural objections: a quorum issue in which a Chairman and a single Member is said to pass orders, a contention linked to the Division Bench decision Kerala Self Financing Dental College, Kothamangalam v. State of Kerala and another (2017 (5) KHC 919 (DB)); and maintainability concerns, pointing to representation by an Advocate for 15 students (or a Parents’ Association) rather than proper aggrieved parties. The court discussed the AFRC’s power to frame Regulations and regulate hearings, referencing a prior Division Bench judgment (W.P.(C) No. 41590 of 2018) and concluded that the impugned orders were unsustainable for lack of proper adjudication and due process. The petitions were disposed of by setting aside Exts.P2/P4 (1767/2018) and Exts.P3/P5 (14036/2018) and closing pending interlocutory applications, with readjudication ordered.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Medical Education (Regulation and Control of Admission to Private Medical Educational Institutions) Act, 2017Section 5(3) of the Kerala Medical Education Act, 2017

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Quasi-judicial authority
  • Regulation of procedure by a committee
  • Quorum and representation in quasi-judicial proceedings
  • Authority of a committee to frame Regulations and fix hearing procedures

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners submit that the course is 4½ years and the Government and the agreement fix the fee schedule in five instalments. They contend that in the final six months of a 4½‑year course, the students should pay only 50% of the annual fee, not the full fee. They challenge the AFRC orders as not examining the merits, being cursory, and failing to consider the proper party representation (a single lawyer representing 15 students or an unregistered Parents’ Association). They rely on the Kerala Self Financing Dental College, Kothamangalam v. State of Kerala (2017 (5) KHC 919 (DB)) to argue about quorum and the need for proper procedural safeguards; they also point to the Division Bench judgment in W.P.(C) No. 41590 of 2018 to support a view that the AFRC has power to frame Regulations and regulate hearings and that a Chairman plus one Member order is not necessarily illegal. They urge readjudication with due process and proper parties.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that the AFRC has jurisdiction and power to determine fee matters, including framing Regulations and regulating hearings, and that the complaints were properly heard. They argue that five‑year instalment structure fixed by GO 2013 and the 2012 agreement binds the students, and the final six months cannot be automatically reduced to 50%. They maintain that the complaints were filed by proper entities and that the matter requires adjudication on its merits by a quasi‑judicial body. They emphasize that the petitioners’ challenge to quorum and procedural issues should not derail the AFRC’s mandate, and that the court should not substitute its own assessment for the AFRC’s findings without a clear error.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Kerala Self Financing Dental College, Kothamangalam v. State of Kerala and another2017(5) KHC 919 (DB)PositiveCited as authority on the Committee’s regulatory powers and on the discussion of quorum and procedural norms; the Division Bench had struck down Section 5(3) and emphasized the Committee’s power to frame Regulations.
W.P.(C) No. 41590 of 2018—PositiveReferenced for the proposition that the Committee may regulate its procedures; the present judgment notes this prior view and does not adopt a contrary position.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Educare Institute of Dental Sciences Kilayamannil Campus v. Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee for Medical Education in Kerala and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE** ## **&** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR** **TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1941** **WP(C).No.1767 OF 2018(U)** ## **PETITIONER:** **EDUCARE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES KILYAMANNIL CAMPUS,CHATTIPARAMBA, MALAPURAM 676 504 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.** **BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.ARUN THOMAS SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN SMT.KARTHIKA MARIA SMT.MARIA ROY SRI.VIJAY V. PAUL SMT.VEENA RAVEENDRAN** ## **RESPONDENTS:** **1 ADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION IN KERALA,T.C 15/1553-4, PRASANTHI BUILDINGS,M.P.APPAN ROAD, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014** **2 THE IV YEAR STUDENTS OF EDUCARE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES,CHATTIPARAMBA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673635,REPRESENTED BY ADVOCATE K.K.SAIDALAVI. (DELETED)** **(R2 IS DELETED AT THE RISK OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ORDER DATED 31.7.2018 IN IA 13844/2018)** **:-2-:** ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** - **3 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-698001.** - ***4 FATHIMA WAFADA M.P SWAFAR (H), KARUMBIL, VENNIOOR P O, MALAPPURAM-676508.** - ***5 LUBNA.P** - **PULATH(H), PANNIKKOTTUMUNDA, CHOKKAD P O, MALAPPURAM-679332.** - ***6 SAFUVA V.P VALIYAPEEDIYEKKAL HOUSE, KODAKKAD P O, MALAPPURAM-676319.** - ***7 AISWARYA.K KOLAYIL HOUSE, AYIKKARAPPADI P O, MALAPPURAM-673637.** - ***8 SREYA JYOTHIBAS SHIVAM, KODIYERI, PARAL P O, THALASSERY, KANNUR-670671.** - ***9 JIDNA P PANAZHI HOUSE, RAMANATTUKARA P O, CALICUT-673633.** - ***10 ANJU SOMAN K.M KOYAPPAMADATHIL HOUSE, ENGALATHUPADAM, RAMANATTUKARA P O, KOZHIKODE-673633.** - ***11 KADEEJA LUBANA PARCHERI PARAMBIL, ARAMBRAM, PADANILAM P O, CALICUT-673571.** - ***12 HUDA SHARAFIN.M MALIYEKKAL HOUSE, SANTHI NAGAR, EANGAPUZHA, PUTHUPPADI P O, CALICUT-673586.** ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** ## **:-3-:** - ***13 SHAHANA ALI** - **AL RAYYAN HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, PULIKKAL P O, MALAPPURAM-673637.** - ***14 JANISHA.V VATTAMANNATHODI HOUSE, KOOTTIL P O, MANKADA, MALAPPURAM-676324.** - ***15 FATHIMA FASNA K.P ITTOOTIL HOUSE, OLAVATTUR P O, KONDOTTY (VIA), MALAPPURAM-673638.** - ***16 SHANA PARVEEN P.K PERUVANKUZHIYIL HOUSE, KEERANKUNDU, KOOTTILANGADI P O, MALAPPURAM-676506.** - ***(R4-R16 ARE IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DATED 31.1.2018 IN IA 1777/18)** **R1 BY ADV. SMT.MARY BENJEMIN, SC R4-16 BY ADV. SRI.P.T.ABHILASH** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SPL.GP-SRI. M.A.ASIF** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.11.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).14036/2018(D), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** **:-4-:** ## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE** ## **&** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR** **TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1941** **WP(C).No.14036 OF 2018** ## **PETITIONER:** **EDUCARE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES KILYAMANNIL CAMPUS, CHATTIPARAMBA, MALAPURAM-676 504, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.** **BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.ARUN THOMAS SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN SMT.KARTHIKA MARIA SMT.MARIA ROY SRI.VIJAY V. PAUL SMT.VEENA RAVEENDRAN** ## **RESPONDENTS:** **1 FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION IN KERALA,T.C 15/1553-4, PRASANTHI BUILDINGS,M.P APPAN ROAD, VAZHUTHACAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.** ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** **:-5-:** **2 PARENTS ASSOCIATION OF IVTH YEAR STUDENTS OF EDUCARE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES, CHATTIPARAMBA,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, ADV. K.K SAIDALAVI, PARAPPANANGADI 676 303.MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **3 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.** **R2 BY ADV. SMT.P.A.REZIYA SPL.GP-SRI. M.A.ASIF BY ADV.MARY BENJAMIN, SC** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.11.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).1767/2018(U), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** ## **:-6-:** **Dated this the 5[th] day of November, 2019** ## **J U D G M E N T** ## **SHAFFIQUE, J.** These two writ petitions were filed challenging the orders passed by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee permitting the students of Educare Institute of Dental Sciences to pay the final year's fee at 50%. Their contention was that in so far as the course was for 4½ years, the six months' fee shall not be charged akin to the Annual fee that was being collected in the previous year and their obligation was only to pay 50% of the same. While impugning the aforesaid orders, the learned counsel for the petitioner raised several contentions. One of the contentions is based on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in **Kerala Self Financing Dental College, Kothamangalam v. State of Kerala and another [2017(5) KHC 919 (DB)]** , ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** **:-7-:** wherein this Court struck off Section 5(3) of the Kerala Medical Education (Regulation and Control of Admission to Private Medical Educational Institutions) Act, 2017, which provided for a quorum for convening a meeting. It is _inter alia_ contended that while this Court in the said judgment had observed that the entire Committee of members constitutes a quorum, an order passed by the Chairman and a single Member is illegal. It is also contended that the complaint itself was not maintainable, as in one case 15 students were represented by an Advocate and in yet another case it was the Parents' Association who had filed the complaint. On merits it is contended that when the fee is spread over for the entire 4½ years and collected in instalments, the Committee committed error in directing that during the final six months' period, only 50% fee is paid. ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** ## **:-8-:** 2. We heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondents also. 3. As far as the jurisdiction of a Chairman and one Member to pass an order is concerned, a Division Bench of this Court (including myself) have already dealt with this issue in our judgment dated 19.3.2019 in W.P.(C)No.41590 of 2018. In that judgment, we have held that the Committee has the power to frame Regulations, to fix their own procedure for hearing and deciding the matter and even in the absence of a provision relating to quorum, it shall be open for the Committee to regulate their procedure. That apart, it was observed that the Regulation by which the Chairman and a Member was authorised to consider the complaint was not brought to the notice of the Division Bench while considering the judgment in **Kerala Self Financing Dental College's case** ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** **:-9-:** ( _supra)_ . Hence, we do not think it necessary for us to take a different view in this case as well. 4. Now, regarding the maintainability of the complaint, apparently when a matter is filed before a Quasi Judicial Authority, the proper parties are to be impleaded in the case. This is also a situation in which, in one case, a lawyer represented 15 students and in another case it is the Parents' Association that has come forward. Unless and until a complaint is filed in a proper format, in the sense that, an aggrieved person approaches the forum, it is not open for the Committee to adjudicate such matters. If there is any such defect, the complainant ought to be given an opportunity to file a proper complaint or rectify the defects noted in the complaint. Merely for the reason that a lawyer had approached the Committee alleging that he represents 15 students ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** ## **:-10-:** will not enable the Committee to adjudicate the complaint. The same is the situation with reference to an association which is not a registered body. Only a legal entity, either a person or a duly constituted association of persons, a society, a company or a firm can agitate the matter before the Quasi Judicial Authorities. It is brought to our notice that all the students who are aggrieved had submitted a signed statement before the Committee, before the Committee had taken a final decision in the matter. However, the Committee shall ensure that proper parties are before it, while taking a decision in the matter. 5. As far as the merits of the contentions are concerned, the contention urged by the students or persons representing them was that when the course is only for 4½ years, for the final year, they need not pay the full fee. Apparently, the entire fee ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** ## **:-11-:** for the course is spread over in five instalments. The fee had been fixed as per the Government Order dated 12.6.2013 (Ext.P5 in W.P.(C)No.1767/2018) and agreement dated 16.5.2012 (Ext.P1 in W.P. (C)No.14036/2018). When the fee had been fixed by the Government and it had been agreed upon by the students, which is to be paid in five instalments on every year, it cannot be stated that they have no obligation to pay the full fee. From the impugned orders, it can be seen that the Committee has not gone into an adjudication of the merits involved in the matter, whereas a cursory order is seen to have been passed without going into the merits of the respective contentions. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Committee submits that the persons involved in the matter were already heard which is evident from the materials placed on record. We, therefore are of ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** **:-12-:** the view that the impugned orders cannot be sustained. In the result, the writ petitions are disposed of as under; Exts.P2 and P4 orders in W.P. (C)No.1767 of 2018 and Exts.P3 and P5 orders in W.P.(C)No.14036 of 2018 are set aside. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. Sd/- **A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE** Sd/- ## **T.V.ANILKUMAR JUDGE** ami/ ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** **:-13-:** ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1767/2018** ## **PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT (NUMBERED AS ASC (P) NO.167/17/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS) SUBMITTED BY THE IVTH YEAR SUDENTS OF EDUCARE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES, CHATTIPARAMBA BEFORE THE ADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THE ADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE IN ASC (P) NO.167/17/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS DATED 21/7/2017** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER COLLEGE ASC (P) NO.167/17/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS.** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN ASC (P) NO.167/17/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS DATED 29/12/2017 PASSED BY THE ADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE.** |**EXHIBIT P4**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN ASC (P)**<br>**NO.167/17/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS DATED**<br>**29/12/2017 PASSED BY THE ADMISSION AND**<br>**FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE.**| |---|---| |**EXHIBIT P5**|**TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER - G.O.**| ||**(RT) NO.2022/13/H&FWD DATED 12/6/2013**| **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** **:-14-:** ## **PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES** |**ANNEXURE-1**|**PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT**|**PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT**| |---|---|---| ||**EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF THE COPIES OF THE**|| ||**WRIT PETITION AND THE ORDER BY 4**|| ||**STUDENTS**|| |**ANNEXURE-2**|**PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT DULY**|| ||**SIGNED BY THREE STUDENTS EVIDENCING**|| ||**RECEIPT OF THE COPIES OF THE WRIT**|| ||**PETITION AND THE ORDER.**|| |**ANNEXURE-3**|**PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT RECEIVED FROM**|| ||**THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF THE**|| ||**PETITIONER COLLEGE EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF**|| ||**THE COPIES OF THE WRIT**|**PETITION AND THE**| ||**ORDER BY 6 STUDENTS.**|| |**RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:**||| |**EXHIBIT R13(A):**|**THE PHOTOCOPY OF G.O.(RT)**|| ||**NO.1585/13/H&FED DATED**|**7.5.2013.**| ## **W.P.(C)Nos.1767 and 14036 of 2018** **:-15-:** ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14036/2018** ## **PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 16-05-2012 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE GOVERNOR OF KERALA AND ALL KERALA SELF FINANCING DENTAL COLLEGE MANAGEMENT CONSORTIUM.** - **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT (NUMBERED AS ASC (P) NO. 167/17/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS) SUBMITTED BY THE PARENTS ASSOCIATION OF IVTH YEAR STUDENTS OF EDUCARE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES, CHATTIPARAMBA BEFORE THE ADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE.** - **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THE ADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE IN ASC (P) NO. 116/16/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS DATED 24-06-2016.** - **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER COLLEGE ASC (P) NO. 116/16/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS.** - **EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN ASC (P) NO. 116/16/HO/TVPM/BDS/EIDS DATED 21-10-2016 PASSED BY THE ADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE.** - **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 17-01-2018 IN W.P(C) NO. 1767/2018.**