High Court of KeralaDivision BenchOA disposed of; no interference with interim or...

Dr. Salim A v State of Kerala & Others

Case / Petition Number:OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ALEXANDER THOMAS
  • BASANT BALAJI
Judgment Date
2021-12-09
Court Decision / Holding
The High Court held that Ext.P2 was an ad interim order at the admission stage and not amenable to challenge under Articles 226/227. It declined to interfere and disposed of the OA, directing the Tribunal to proceed with the case and to hear the petitioner’s pleas on interim relief on 15.12.2021.
Final Disposition
OA disposed of; no interference with interim order; Tribunal to proceed and examine pleas on interim relief on 15.12.2021; original petitions disposed of as stated in the judgment.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Dr. Salim A

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram, PIN-695001
  • Director of Technical Education, Directorate of Technical Education, Padmavilasam Road, Thiruvananthapuram, PIN-695023
  • Staff Selection Committee constituted as per G.O.(RT) No.1326/2021/HEDN dated 5.10.2021, represented by its Chairman, Additional Chief Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram, PIN-695001
  • Dr. Rajasree M.S., Vice Chancellor, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, PIN-695016
  • Dr. Shaji P.R., Dean Research, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, PIN-695016

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • A. Aruna

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri. Saigi Jacob Palatti, Sr.Govt.Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Salim A., filed OP(KAT) No. 347 of 2021 challenging the Kerala Administrative Tribunal’s interim order in OA 2290/2021 dated 06.12.2021. The core prayer in OA 2290/2021 was to set aside Annexures A15 to A20 on the grounds of illegality, arbitrariness, malice and violation of Rule 28(b) Part II KS & SSR, 1958; to hold that the petitioner is not liable to be reverted to the post of Associate Professor and to continue or be promoted to Professor with effect from 20.12.2017; to exclude respondents 4 and 5 from the Staff Selection Committee per Annexure A14; and to publish and maintain select lists in seniority order, with feeder categories and higher pay scales given primacy, in line with Annexure A14 judgment. The High Court, per a Division Bench, held that the Ext.P2 order of the Tribunal was an ad interim/admission-stage order to facilitate factual verification and could not be challenged under Articles 226/227. It declined to interfere, noting the constitutional powers of judicial review are well defined. The OA was disposed of, with directions to post the matter for further consideration by the Tribunal on 15.12.2021 and to examine the petitioner’s pleas on the interim relief sought. The bench emphasized reverence for the Tribunal’s adjudicatory process rather than reassessment of Ext.P2.”

Provisions of Law Cited

Rule 28(b) Part II KS & SSR, 1958Kerala State & Subordinate Service Rules, 1958 (Part II)G.O.(RT) No.1326/2021/HEDN dated 5.10.2021G.O.(MS) No.504/2021/H.EDN dated 11.11.2021G.O.(MS) No.505/2021/H.EDN dated 11.11.2021G.O.(MS) No.514/2021/H.EDN dated 11.11.2021G.O.(MS) No.534/2021/H.EDN dated 18.11.2021G.O.(MS) No.535/2021/H.EDN dated 18.11.2021G.O.(MS) No.433/2021/H.EDN dated 9.10.2021G.O.(MS) No.57/2019, H.EDN dated 7.3.2019S.L.P. (Civil) 16400/2014OA 1551/2014OP(KAT)133/2019 (and connected judgments)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Power of judicial review and superintendence under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India
  • Interim orders at admission stage cannot be challenged under Articles 226/227
  • Well-defined limits of judicial review in exercise of writ jurisdiction

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The applicant asserts the OA sought to nullify Annexures A15 to A20 as unjust, illegal, and violative of Rule 28(b) Part II KS & SSR 1958; seeks reversal of reversion and promotion to Professor with effect from 20.12.2017; challenges the composition and actions of the Staff Selection Committee and seeks fresh selection lists in accordance with Annexure A14 judgment.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend the Ext.P2 order in OA 2290/2021 is an ad interim order issued at admission stage to enable factual verification; such an order cannot be challenged under Articles 226/227; interfering would exceed the court’s powers; the matter should be left to the Tribunal for a full decision.

Cited Precedents (3)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
OP(KAT)133/2019OP(KAT)133/2019Mentioned OnlyJudgment dated 3.12.2020 in OP(KAT)133/2019 and connected cases referenced in Annexure A14.
Civil Appeal No.4502/2016Civil Appeal No.4502/2016Mentioned OnlyReferenced in Annexure A11 as a Supreme Court decision; mentions related principles.
SLP (Civil) 16400/2014SLP(C) 16400/2014Mentioned OnlyReferenced in Annexure A9; indicates Supreme Court order context.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Dr. Salim A v State of Kerala & Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS`** ## **`&`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI THURSDAY, THE 9[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943 OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA 2290/2021 DATED 06.12.2021 OF KERALA ``` ``` ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` DR.SALIM A, AGED 52 YEARS PROFESSOR (UNDER ORDERS OF REVERSION TO THE POST OF ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR), S/O. ABDUL AZEEZ, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING TRIVANDRUM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 016 RESIDING AT KOTTAPPURAM, MANGAD, KOLLAM, PIN-691 015. ``` ``` BY ADV A.ARUNA ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** - `1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.` - `2 DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, PADMAVILASAM ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 023.` - `3 STAFF SELECTION COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED AS PER G.O.(RT)NO.1326/2021/HEDN DATED 5.10.2021, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.` - `4 DR.RAJASREE M.S. (AGE, NAME OF FATHER AND PERSONAL ADDRESS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), VICE CHANCELLOR, APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, ALATHARA RD, AMBADY NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN-695 016.` ``` OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021 ``` ``` -2- ``` - `5 DR.SHAJIJ P.R. (AGE, NAME OF FATHER AND PERSONAL ADDRESS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), DEAN RESEARCH, APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, ALATHARA RD, AMBADY NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN-695 016.` ``` SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, SR.GOVT.PLEADER ``` ``` THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021 ``` ``` -3- ``` ## **ALEXANDER THOMAS & BASANT BALAJI, JJ. =========================** **O.P.(K.A.T.) No. 347 of 2021** (Arising out of order dated 06.12.2021 in O.A 2290 of 2021, of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Tvm) **=========================** Dated this the 9[th] day of December, 2021 ## **JUDGMENT** ## ALEXANDER THOMAS, J. Petitioner herein has filed the instant Ext.P1 OA No. 2290 of 2021, and the main prayers in the said OA are as follows: “i. Set aside Annexures A15 to A20 as unjust, illegal, arbitrary, vitiated by malice and as violative of Rule 28(b) of the Part II of Kerala State & Subordinate Service Rules, 1958. ii. Declare that, the applicant is not liable to be reverted to the post of Associate Professor and that he is entitled to be promoted as/continue as a Professor with effect from 20.12.2017. iii. Declare that, A15 to A20 as unjust, illegal, arbitrary, vitiated by malice and as violative of Rule 28(b) of the Part II of Kerala ``` OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021 ``` ``` -4- ``` State & Subordinate Service Rules, 1958. iv. Declare that the respondents 4 and 5 cannot be included as a member of Staff Selection Committee constituted as per the directions in Annexure A14. v. Declare that the respondents 1 to 3 are liable to publish select list according to the seniority of the candidates in the feeder category and by showing the feeder categories such as Professors, Associate Professors and Assistant professors in separate lists and that persons in a lower scale of pay shall be appointed only after appointing all persons on a higher scale of pay for complying with the directions in Annexure A14 judgment. vi. Direct the respondents 1 and 2 to constitute a fresh Selection Committees, Conduct Selection process, publish select list and make appointments/promotions from the select list to the post of Principal/Joint Director (Technical education, Professor and Associate Professor under the 1[st] respondent as per Rule 28(b) of the Part II of Kerala State & Subordinate Service Rules, 1958, including Rules 28 (b)(i)(1)(2)(3) and (7) for complying with the directions in Annexure A14 judgment. ``` OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021 ``` ``` -5- ``` vii. Direct the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel Annexures 15 to 20 and to publish a fresh Select list for promotion to the post of Professor (Computer Science and Engineering) by including the name of applicant and to promote him to the said post with effect from 20.12.2017. vii. Such other reliefs as his Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.” 2. Heard Kum. A. Aruna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the OP / sole applicant in the OA before the Tribunal and Sri. Saiji Jacob Palatti, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents 1 and 2 in the OP. Notice to respondents 4 and 5 will stand dismissed with. 3. Order under challenge in this OP is one at Ext.P2 rendered by the Tribunal dated 06.06.2021, filed by the petitioner herein before the Tribunal. The said impugned order Ext.P2 dated 06.06.2021 rendered by the Tribunal in ``` OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021 ``` ``` -6- ``` the instant OA No. 2290 of 20212, reads as follows: “Learned Government Pleader will get instructions on the averments in the Original Application as to: - (1) The inclusion of respondents 4 and 5 - in the Staff Selection Committee constituted as per Annexure A15 order; (2) The non-compliance with Rule 28(b) Part II KS & SSR despite the specific direction of the Hon’ble High Court in Annexure A14 judgment; and - (3) The requirement for reversion of the applicant.” 4. After hearing both sides, we are of the view that the above said order passed by the Tribunal is only an ad interim order and that order was passed at the admission stage only to enable the Tribunal to get factual details in the matter. Such order cannot be challenged under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. If we entertain this OP, it will amount to the Court exceeding its well defined powers of judicial review and superintendence conferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, we are not ``` OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021 ``` ``` -7- ``` inclined to accept the plea of the learned counsel for the petitioner to interfere with the above said order. 5. The OA will stand posted before the Tribunal on 15.12.2021. We are sure that the Tribunal will certainly examine the pleas of the petitioner in regard to the interim relief sought for in the OA. The Original Petitions will stand disposed of as above. **`Sd/ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE`** Sd/- **`BASANT BALAJI JUDGE`** uu ## **`OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021`** ``` -8- ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF OP(KAT) 347/2021`** |`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`|`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`| |---|---| |`Exhibit P1`|`TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF OA`| ||`2290/2021 TOGETHER WITH ITS ANNEXURES.`| |`Annexure A1`|`TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST PAGE OF THE`| ||`APPOINTMENT ORDER NO.EA4/16084/2001`| ||`DATED 23.7.2001 ISSUED FROM THE`| ||`DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION.`| |`Annexure A2`|`TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE`| ||`KERALA TECHNICAL EDUCATION SERVICE`| ||`ISSUED AS PER G.O. (MS) NO.284 DATED`| ||`2.9.1967.`| |`Annexure A3`|`TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION`| ||`F.NO.FD/PSSC/NOTIFICATIONS/2002/1 DATED`| ||`18.2.2003 ISSUED BY AICTE.`| |`Annexure A4`|`TRUE COPY OF THE SPECIAL RULES FOR THE`| ||`KERALA TECHNICAL EDUCATION (AMENDMENT)`| ||`RULES 2004 PUBLISHED IN THE EXTRA`| ||`ORDINARY GAZETTE DATED 27.9.2004.`| |`Annexure A5`|`TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED`| ||`23.7.2005 ISSUED FROM THE NATIONAL`| ||`INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.`| |`Annexure A6`|`TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER 27.2.2009`| ||`IN WPC 35729/2008.`| |`Annexure A7`|`TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF PAY`| ||`SCALE, SERVICE CONDITIONS AND`| ||`QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TEACHERS AND`| ||`OTHER ACADEMIC STAFF IN TECHNICAL`| ||`INSTITUTIONS (DEGREE), REGULATIONS,`| ||`2010.`| |`Annexure A8`|`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.8.2014`| ||`IN OA 1551/2014.`| |`Annexure A9`|`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2014`| ||`IN SLP (CIVIL) 16400/2014 PASSED BY THE`| ||`HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.`| |`Annexure A10`|`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.4.2016`| ## **`OP(KAT) NO. 347 OF 2021`** ``` -9- ``` ||`IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.4502/2016 PASSED BY`| |---|---| ||`THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.`| |`Annexure A11`|`TRUE COPY OF THE PH.D DEGREE CERTIFICATE`| ||`ISSUED TO THE APPLICANT DATED 17.7.2018`| ||`ISSUED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA IS`| ||`PRODUCED.`| |`Annexure A12`|`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.11.2017`| ||`IN OA(EKM) 1551/2014 AND CONNTECTED`| ||`CASES ARE PRODUCED.`| |`Annexure A13`|`TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(MS)NO.57/2019,`| ||`H.EDN DATED 7.3.2019 IS PRODUCED.`| |`Annexure A14`|`TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE`| ||`JUDGMENT DATED 3.12.2020 IN`| ||`OP(KAT)133/2019 AND CONNECTED CASES.`| |`Annexure A15`|`TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT)`| ||`NO.1326/2021/HEDN DATED 5.10.2021.`| |`Annexure A16`|`TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)`| ||`NO.504/2021/H.EDN DATED 11.11.2021.`| |`Annexure A17`|`TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)`| ||`NO.505/2021/H.EDN DATED 11.11.2021.`| |`Annexure A18`|`TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)`| ||`NO.514/2021/H.EDN DATED 11.11.2021.`| |`Annexure A19`|`TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)`| ||`NO.534/2021/H.EDN DATED 18.11.2021.`| |`Annexure A20`|`TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)`| ||`NO.535/2021/H.EDN DATED 18.11.2021.`| |`Annexure A21`|`TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)`| ||`NO.433/2021/H.EDN DATED 9.10.2021.`| |`Exhibit P2`|`TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED`| ||`6.12.2021 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KERALA`| ||`ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN OA 2290/2021.`|