High CourtDivision BenchDismissed

DIWAKAR SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADHESH AND ORS.

Case / Petition Number:Civil Appeal Nos. 6407-6408 of 1983; Civil Appeal Nos. 8201-04 of 1983; Civil Appeal No. 8200 of 1983
Neutral Citation:1984 SCR (2) 793

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • Chinnappa Reddy
  • E. S. Venkatramiah
  • R. B. Misra
Judgment Date
1984-02-02
Court Decision / Holding
Appeals dismissed. The Court held that the procedural flaw of not impleading persons likely to be affected bars adjudication on the legality of the relaxation. It directed that if vacancies arise due to non-availability of SC/ST candidates, such vacancies may be filled from the general category on merit.
Final Disposition
Dismissed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Diwakar Shrivastava and others

Respondents

  • State of Madhya Pradesh and others

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Chiv Dayal
  • • G. L. Sanghi
  • • Mukul Mudgal
  • • J. P. Sanghi

Counsels for Respondents

  • • A. K. Sanghi
  • • S. R. Agawala
  • • V. K. Chitre

Case Synopsis & Summary

This Supreme Court decision concerns the relaxation granted to candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in regard to the minimum qualifying marks for admission into medical colleges in Madhya Pradesh. The appellants challenged this relaxation on the ground that the persons likely to be affected by the change had not been properly impleaded as parties, and thus the legality of the relaxation could not be decided without due process. The Court held that rules of natural justice apply with equal force to court proceedings as to other competent authorities. It noted that in cases involving a large number of affected persons, representative litigation or limited representation might be permissible, but that was not the situation here since no affected persons were impleaded. The appellants argued that unfilled seats reserved for SC/ST could be transferred to the general category and that they could be admitted against those vacancies. The respondents countered, stating that for 1982-83 all seats (including transferred reserved seats) were filled and there were no vacancies, while for 1983-84 information about vacancies was not definite; they suggested that if vacancies arose due to lack of SC/ST candidates, they could be filled from the general category on merit. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the appeals on the preliminary ground of non-impleadment, while prescribing that any vacancies arising from non-availability of SC/ST candidates should be filled from the general category on merit, if required.

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Rules of natural justice apply to proceedings in courts of law
  • Principle that persons likely to be affected must be impleaded as parties

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Appellants contended that the relaxation in minimum qualifying marks for SC/ST candidates should be susceptible to scrutiny only after impleading the persons likely to be affected; they urged that unfilled reserved seats, if any, could be transferred to the general category, and that the appellants could be admitted against those vacancies. They argued that without proper impleadment the legality of the relaxation could not be decided.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents argued that in 1982-83 all reserved and transferred seats were filled and no vacancies remained; for 1983-84, information on vacancies was not definite, but if vacancies arose due to the non-availability of SC/ST candidates, those vacancies should be filled from the general category on merit; they contended that the court should not entertain the challenge without proper impleadment of those likely to be affected.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against DIWAKAR SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADHESH AND ORS. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

792 A B DIW AKAR SHRIVAST A VA AND ORS. _v._ STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. _February 2, 1984_ #### [0. CHINNAPPA RBDDY, E. s. VENKATARAMIAH AND R. B. MISRA, JJ.] · _Civil Procedure-Persons likely to be affeccttd must be impleaded as partit!s,_ _Natural Justice-Applicabilily of,_ The appellants questioned the relaxation granted to candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in regard to the minimum qualifying C marks for admission into the medical coUeges without properly impleading the persons who were likely to be affected if the sumissions of the appe'llants were accepted. Dismissing the appeals, D. E F HELD : Rules of natural justice apply as much to proceedings in courts of law as to proceedings before authorities elsewhere. It may be that where a general question is involved and a large number of rersons are concerned, the court may, in appropriate cases, permit a few of then1 to be sued in a represen· tative·capicity or may consider them as sufficienily represented by a few who have been properly impleaded as parties. [793F-GJ 'In the instant case no effort bas been made to implead any person likely to be affected as a party to the proceedings. The question of the legality or validity of the relaxation granted in their favour cannot possibly be decided in their absence. [7930 ; F] ' CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICITION : Civil Appeal Nos. 6407 -6408 of 1983. ' Appeals by Special leave from the Judgment and Order doted the 17th March, 1983 of the Madhya Pradesh High Caurt in Misc. Petition Nos. 1232 andll604 of 1982. WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 8201-04 of 1983. Appeals by Special leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 22nd August, 1983 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc, G Petitions Nos. 1876, 1908, 1909 and 1976 of 1983, D. SHRIVASTAVA _v._ M.P. STATE _(Chinnappa_ _Reddy,_ _J.)_ 793 AND Civil Appeal No. 8200 of 1983. Appeal by Special leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 6th September, 1983 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc. Petition No. 2140 of 1983. _,:,hiv_ _Dayal, G._ _L._ _Sanghi,_ _Mukul_ _Mudgal_ and _J._ _P._ _Sanghi_ for the Appellants. _A._ _K._ _Sanghi_,_ S. _R._ _Agawala_ and _V._ _K_ _Chitre_ for the Respondents. C. _L._ _Sahu_ for the Intervener Madanlal. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Cu1NNAPPA REDDY, J. The appellants in the several appeals before us question th' relaxation granted· to candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes and t)le Scheduled Tribes in regard to the minimum qualifying marks for admission into the medical colleges of the State of Madhya Pradesh. We are afraid we have to throw out these appeals on the preliminary ground that the persons likely to be affected if we agree with the submissions made on behalf of the appellants, that is, the candidates belonging tot he Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes who have secured admission into the medical colleges as a result of the relaxation granted to them have not been brought before us by being properly impleaded as parties. We fail to see how the question of the legality or validity of the reb.xation granted in their favour can possibly be dedded in their absence. Rules of natural justice apply as much to proceedings in courts of law as to proceedings before authorities elsewhere. It may be that where a general question is involved and a large num**ber** **of persons are .concerned, the court may, in** **appropr_iate** **cases,** permit a few of them to be sued in a representative capacity,or may· consider them as sufficiently represented by a few who have been properly impleaded as parties. That is not the situation here. No effort has been made to implead any person likely to be affected as a party to the proceeding. All the appeals are liable to be dismissed on this short ground. A B ## c D E F G The learned counsel for the appellants urged that some seats reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which have not been filled' on account of non-availability of candidates H A B ### c D 794 . SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1984] 2 '.C.R. have to be transferred to the general category under the. rules and are, therefore, available for candidates coming under the general category. The counsel for the appellants suggests that the several appellants may be accommodated against these vacancies and directed to be admitted into one or other of the medical colleges. So far as admission to medical colleges for the year 1982-83 is concerned, it is stated in the additional counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the first respondont that ail the seats including those transferred from the reserved category to the general cotegory have been filled and there are no more vacancies. It .is, therefore, un· necessery to give any direction in Civil Appeal Nos. 6407 and 6408 . which relate to the year 1982-83. The other appeals relate to admis sions during the year !983-84. In these cases, we have no definite information as to the number of vac~ncies available. Even if there are a large number of vacancies, we cannot give any direction to admit the appellants against those vacancies since we are not in a position to say that appellants are the best candidates from the general category. All that we can do is to say that if on account of non-availabity of candidates from the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, there are any vacancies which are required to be transferred to tho general category under the rules, such vacancies may be filled up from the general category on the basis of merit. We do not have any doubt that this will be done. Subject to this direction, the appeals are dismissed. H.S.K. _Appeals disrnssed._ , I