High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeBail Granted; Application Allowed

Dhanesh v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:BAIL APPL. NO. 10958 OF 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C. S. Dias
Judgment Date
2024-01-08
Court Decision / Holding
The application is allowed. The petitioner is to be released on bail on a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two solvent sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular appearance, refraining from inducing or tampering with witnesses, refraining from committing offences, surrender of passport (if any), and the court’s power to cancel or modify bail for violations. Investigations may proceed and recoveries can be effected as per applicable law, consistent with Sushila Aggarwal doctrine.
Final Disposition
Bail Granted; Application Allowed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Dhanesh

Respondents

  • State of Kerala
  • Station House Officer, Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • K. Siju
  • • Anjana Kannath

Counsels for Respondents

  • • C. S. Hrithwik

Case Synopsis & Summary

Petitioner Dhanesh, the third accused in Crime No.1558/2023 of the Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam, moves the High Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail in NDPS offences (Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) and 29). He was arrested on 9 November 2023 after 4.302 kg of ganja was seized allegedly for sale. The petitioner claims innocence and false implication, and urges parity with the fourth accused who was enlarged on bail by order in BA No. 10987/2023 dated 29 December 2023. The Public Prosecutor concedes that the final report has not been filed and that investigation is not complete. The court notes the proviso to subsection (2) of Section 167 CrPC provides for statutory bail where the final report is not laid within 60/90 days from arrest. On these facts, and considering the delay in filing the final report, the court concludes that the petitioner is entitled to statutory bail. The application is allowed, directing release on bail on a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two solvent sureties for the same amount, subject to conditions: periodic appearances before the investigating officer, non-tampering with witnesses or evidence, no commission of offences, surrender of passport if any, and the court’s power to cancel/modify bail for violations. The court also cites Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another to support that investigations and recoveries may proceed even while on bail.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985Proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Statutory bail under proviso to Section 167 CrPC when the final report is not laid within statutory period
  • Parity principle in bail decisions
  • Investigation and recoveries can be carried out while on bail (as per Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner asserts innocence and false implication, invoking parity with the fourth accused who was granted bail in BA 10987/2023 (dated 29.12.2023). He emphasizes that the final report has not been filed and that he is entitled to statutory bail under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC.

Contentions of Respondents

The prosecution concedes arrest and ongoing investigation with no final report filed; the case is that the investigation is not complete and that the final report is pending.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another2020 (1) KHC 663PositiveCited to justify that investigations and recoveries may proceed while an accused is on bail, supporting the court’s conditioning and permissive approach to maintain the investigative process.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Dhanesh v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

1 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS ``` ``` MONDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 18TH POUSHA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 10958 OF 2023 ``` ``` CRIME NO.1558/2023 OF Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` DHANESH AGED 30 YEARS S/O.JAYASING, CHARUVILA VEEDU, PUNTHALATHAZHAM, VADAKKEVILA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691010 BY ADVS. K.SIJU ANJANA KANNATH ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2STATION HOUSE OFFICER KILIKOLLOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM, PIN - 691004 ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` C.S.HRITHWIK, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ``` ``` THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` 2 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 ## **C.S.DIAS,J** **====================== Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 ----------------------------------Dated this the 8[th] day of January, 2024** ## **O R D E R** The application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the third accused in crime No.1558/2023 of the Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam, registered against the accused (five in number) alleging them to have committed the offences punishable under Secs.20(b)(ii) (B) and 29 of the NDPS Act (in short, ‘Act’). The petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023. 3 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that: On 9.11.2023 at about 5.40 p.m, the accused were found in possession of 4.302 kg of ganja, which was transported for the purpose of sale. Thus, the accused have committed the above offences. 3. Heard; Sri.K Siju, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.C.S Hrithwik, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is totally innocent of the accusations levelled against him. He has been falsely implicated in the crime. Moreover, this Court by order 4 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 dated 29.12.2023 in BA No.10987/2023 has enlarged the fourth accused on bail. Hence the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the similar order especially taking into account the parity between the fourth accused and the petitioner. Hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor fairly conceded to the fact that the petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023 and the final report has not been filed till date. 6. Indisputably, the petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023 on the allegation that he was found in possession of 4.302 kg of ganja, which is intermediate 5 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 quantity. The prosecution concedes to the fact that the investigation is not complete and the final report has not been filed. 7. The proviso to sub-sec(2) of Sec.167 specifically mandates that if the final report is not laid within 60/90 days from the date of arrest, the petitioner is entitled for compulsive/statutory bail. 8. On an appreciation of the materials placed on record and particularly taking note of the fact that the petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023 and the final report has not been laid, I am of the definite view that the petitioner is entitled to statutory bail. 6 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 In the result, the application is allowed, by directing the petitioner to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, which shall be subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every alternate Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m for a period of three months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier. He shall also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; 7 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever; (iii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while they are on bail; (iv) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the court below at the time of execution of the bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit 8 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 to the effect before the court below on the date of execution of the bond; (v) In case of violation of any of the conditions mentioned above, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law. (vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall be filed and entertained before the court below. (vii) Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate 9 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in **Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another** [2020 (1) KHC 663]. sd/- sks/8.1.2024 **C.S.DIAS, JUDGE** 10 Bail Application No. 10958 of 2023 ## **`APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 10958/2023`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES ``` ``` Annexure A1THE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.1558/2023 OF KILIKOLLOOR POLICE STATION DATED 10.11.2023 Annexure A2THE COMMON ORDER DATED 22.11.2023 IN CRL.M.C NO.2443/2023 AND CRL.M.C 2451/2023 ON THE FILE OF SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM ```