Devaswom Board Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. v. P.N. Sarasamma, Karthiyayani, State of Kerala, Addl.R4 Soman, Addl.R5 Sasikumar, Addl.R6 Remani (WP(C) Nos. 19776/2012 & 19777/2012)
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Amit Rawal
- Judgment Date
- 2023-07-06
- Court Decision / Holding
- The court held the award executable despite де hors findings on point No.1, modified the award: the 1st appellant to pay Rs.29,21,733 with interest at 12% per annum on Rs.17,99,159 from 01-10-2006 until realization; the 2nd appellant’s liability to be set aside; the ARC/8608/2005 award limited to Rs.6,29,295 with 12% interest and costs from the 1st appellant. Writ petitions disposed; society may execute the award in accordance with law.
- Final Disposition
- Writ petitions disposed off
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Devaswom Board Employees Co-operative Society Ltd., No.K 458 represented by its Secretary, Office of the Devaswom Board Employees Co-operative Society, Ettumanoor, Kottayam
Respondents
- P.N. Sarasamma (deceased)
- Karthiyayani (deceased)
- State of Kerala represented by its Secretary to the Co-operative Department
- Addl.R4 Soman
- Addl.R5 Sasikumar
- Addl.R6 Remani
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Sri Liji J. Vadakedom
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri Gigimon Issac
- • Sri A.K. Jayaprakash
- • Sri Justin Jacob, Senior Government Pleader
Case Synopsis & Summary
These two writ petitions challenge a Cooperative Tribunal order under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act for recovery from sureties who executed an indemnity bond in favour of the Society for liabilities arising from its employees. The indemnity bond was executed by the mother for her deceased daughter, with legal representatives stepping in for the daughter. The Tribunal had held that proceedings against the indemnifier would not lie, though it found the 1st respondent liable and dismissed parts of the claim against the 2nd respondent. The Society relies on Shibi K.N. v. Vaniyamkulam Panchayat Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd. (2018) to argue that Section 69(1)(g) would lie against the indemnifier. The High Court holds that the award is executable de hors the unresolved findings on point No.1, and issues directions modifying the award: the 1st appellant is liable for Rs.29,21,733 with 12% interest from 01-10-2006, and the 2nd appellant’s liability is limited; the award relating to ARC Nos.8608/2005 is to the extent of Rs.6,29,295 with 12% interest and costs. Writ petitions are disposed of and execution of the award is permitted in accordance with law. The court clarifies that the challenge is resolved, not a remand, and permits enforcement of the Tribunal’s award subject to the specified alterations.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The Society contends that the indemnity bond and Section 69(1)(g) extend to indemnifiers; relying on Shibi K.N. v. Vaniyamkulam Panchayat Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd., it argues that proceedings under Section 69(1)(g) would lie against the indemnifier and that the Tribunal’s view was erroneous. It seeks execution of the award against the indemnifier and the proper realization of the awarded sums, with limited liability for the 2nd appellant.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents argued that the Tribunal’s findings should be preserved and that the relief should not expand the indemnifier’s liability beyond what the Tribunal held. They contend that the award has to be implemented as per the Tribunal’s conclusions, with the possibility of execution against the liable parties, and that no remand is warranted in the absence of challenge by the erstwhile debtors.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shibi K.N and Anothehr v. Vaniyamkulam Panchayat Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd. No.P1051 & Others | 2018 (3) KHC 952 | Positive | Cited to support that Section 69(1)(g) would lie against the indemnifier; relied upon its holding. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Devaswom Board Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. v. P.N. Sarasamma, Karthiyayani, State of Kerala, Addl.R4 Soman, Addl.R5 Sasikumar, Addl.R6 Remani (WP(C) Nos. 19776/2012 & 19777/2012) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.