High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petitions disposed off

Devaswom Board Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. v. P.N. Sarasamma, Karthiyayani, State of Kerala, Addl.R4 Soman, Addl.R5 Sasikumar, Addl.R6 Remani (WP(C) Nos. 19776/2012 & 19777/2012)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Amit Rawal
Judgment Date
2023-07-06
Court Decision / Holding
The court held the award executable despite де hors findings on point No.1, modified the award: the 1st appellant to pay Rs.29,21,733 with interest at 12% per annum on Rs.17,99,159 from 01-10-2006 until realization; the 2nd appellant’s liability to be set aside; the ARC/8608/2005 award limited to Rs.6,29,295 with 12% interest and costs from the 1st appellant. Writ petitions disposed; society may execute the award in accordance with law.
Final Disposition
Writ petitions disposed off

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Devaswom Board Employees Co-operative Society Ltd., No.K 458 represented by its Secretary, Office of the Devaswom Board Employees Co-operative Society, Ettumanoor, Kottayam

Respondents

  • P.N. Sarasamma (deceased)
  • Karthiyayani (deceased)
  • State of Kerala represented by its Secretary to the Co-operative Department
  • Addl.R4 Soman
  • Addl.R5 Sasikumar
  • Addl.R6 Remani

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri Liji J. Vadakedom

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri Gigimon Issac
  • • Sri A.K. Jayaprakash
  • • Sri Justin Jacob, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

These two writ petitions challenge a Cooperative Tribunal order under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act for recovery from sureties who executed an indemnity bond in favour of the Society for liabilities arising from its employees. The indemnity bond was executed by the mother for her deceased daughter, with legal representatives stepping in for the daughter. The Tribunal had held that proceedings against the indemnifier would not lie, though it found the 1st respondent liable and dismissed parts of the claim against the 2nd respondent. The Society relies on Shibi K.N. v. Vaniyamkulam Panchayat Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd. (2018) to argue that Section 69(1)(g) would lie against the indemnifier. The High Court holds that the award is executable de hors the unresolved findings on point No.1, and issues directions modifying the award: the 1st appellant is liable for Rs.29,21,733 with 12% interest from 01-10-2006, and the 2nd appellant’s liability is limited; the award relating to ARC Nos.8608/2005 is to the extent of Rs.6,29,295 with 12% interest and costs. Writ petitions are disposed of and execution of the award is permitted in accordance with law. The court clarifies that the challenge is resolved, not a remand, and permits enforcement of the Tribunal’s award subject to the specified alterations.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 69 (1)(g) of Kerala Co-operative Societies ActKerala Co-operative Societies Act

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The Society contends that the indemnity bond and Section 69(1)(g) extend to indemnifiers; relying on Shibi K.N. v. Vaniyamkulam Panchayat Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd., it argues that proceedings under Section 69(1)(g) would lie against the indemnifier and that the Tribunal’s view was erroneous. It seeks execution of the award against the indemnifier and the proper realization of the awarded sums, with limited liability for the 2nd appellant.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argued that the Tribunal’s findings should be preserved and that the relief should not expand the indemnifier’s liability beyond what the Tribunal held. They contend that the award has to be implemented as per the Tribunal’s conclusions, with the possibility of execution against the liable parties, and that no remand is warranted in the absence of challenge by the erstwhile debtors.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Shibi K.N and Anothehr v. Vaniyamkulam Panchayat Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd. No.P1051 & Others2018 (3) KHC 952PositiveCited to support that Section 69(1)(g) would lie against the indemnifier; relied upon its holding.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Devaswom Board Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. v. P.N. Sarasamma, Karthiyayani, State of Kerala, Addl.R4 Soman, Addl.R5 Sasikumar, Addl.R6 Remani (WP(C) Nos. 19776/2012 & 19777/2012) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL THURSDAY, THE 6[TH] DAY OF JULY 2023 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 19776 OF 2012`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` DEVASWOM BOARD EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.K.458, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY OFFICE OF THE DEVASWOM BOARD EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, ETUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM. ``` ``` BY ADV SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** ``` 1P.N.SARASAMMA *(DIED) AGED 55 YEARS,D/O. NARAYANAN, AMBADIYIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM MURI, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, NOW RESIDING AT AMBADIYIL,PUTHEN VELI P.O. MONIPPALLI (VIA) MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. ``` ``` 2KARTHIYAYANI *(DIED) AGED 71 YEARS, W/O. NARAYANAN, RESIDING AT AMBADIYIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM MURI, KOOTHATTUKULAM VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA. 3STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ``` ``` ADDL.R4SOMAN, ``` ``` S/O. KARTHIYAYANI, AMBADIYIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULM-686 662 ``` ``` ADDL.R5 SASIKUMAR, ``` ``` S/O. KARTHIYAYANI, AMBADIYIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM-686 662 ``` ``` WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012 ``` 2 ``` ADDL.R6 REMANI ``` ``` D/O.KARTHIYAYANI, AMBADIYIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM-686 662 ``` ``` [ADDL.R4 TO R6 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 25/01/2022 IN IA:1/2022 IN WP(C) 19776/2012] ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.GIGIMON ISSAC SRI.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH SRI. JUSTIN JACOB, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.07.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).19777/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012 ``` 3 # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL`** ``` THURSDAY, THE 6[TH] DAY OF JULY 2023 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 19777 OF 2012`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` DEVASWOM BOARD EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,NO.K 458, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE DEVASWOM BOARD EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,ETTUMANOOR,KOTTAYAM. ``` ``` BY ADV SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** ``` 1P.N.SARASAMMA *(DIED) AGED 55 YEARS, D/O.NARAYANAN, AMBADIYIL HOUSE,KOOTHATTUKULAM MURI, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK,NOW RESIDING AT AMBADIYIL,PUTHENVELI.P.O,MONIPALLI(VIA), MEENACHIL TALUK,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 662. 2KARTHIYAYANI *(DIED) AGED 71 YEARS, W/O.NARAYANAN, RESIDING AT AMBADIYIL HOUSE,KOTHATTUKULAM MURI, KOTHATTUKULAM VILLAGE,MUVATTUPUZHA-686 662. 3STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. ``` ``` ADDL.R4 SOMAN, S/O. KARTHIYAYANI, AMBADIYIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULM-686 662 ``` ``` WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012 ``` 4 ``` ADDL.R 5SASIKUMAR, ``` ``` S/O. KARTHIYAYANI, AMBADIYIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM-686 662 ``` ## `ADDL.R 6 REMANI` ``` D/O.KARTHIYAYANI, AMBADIYIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM-686 662 ``` ``` [ADDL.R4 TO R6 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 25/01/2022 IN IA:1/2022 IN WP(C) 19777/2012] ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.GIGIMON ISSAC SRI.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH SRI. JUSTIN JACOB, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.07.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).19776/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012 ``` 5 ## J U D G M E N T Dated this the 6[th] day of July, 2023 Challenge is against the order of the Tribunal Ext.P5 in both the matters, pertaining to proceedings initiated under Section 69 of Kerala Co-operative Societies Act for recovery of an amount against the sureties, who had executed an indemnity bond in favour of the Society, qua the employees of the society. In these matters, indemnity bond to the society was executed by the mother, since deceased, represented by Legal representatives, for honoring the liability of her daughter respondent No.1, who was also unfortunately died. 2. The Tribunal, noticing the law prevalent at the point of time, observed that such proceedings against surety, who executed the indemnity bond, would not lie and though held the 1[st] respondent liable, closed the proceedings. It is in this background, society has filed these two writ petitions. 3. Learned counsel representing the society relied upon the judgment of this court in **Shibi K.N and Anothehr v. Vaniyamkulam Panchayat Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd. No.P1051 & Others** **[2018 (3) KHC 952],** wherein it has been held that proceedings under ``` WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012 ``` 6 Section 69 (1)(g) of Kerala Co-operative Societies Act would also lie against the indemnifier. It was further contended that the erstwhile debtors ie., respondent No.1 and 2, since deceased represented by legal representatives, did not challenge the findings of the Tribunal fastening liability. In the absence of any such challenge, the matter cannot be remanded back. 4. I am of the view that the award as per judgment is now executable, dehor of the findings rendered on point No.1, in favour of the private party respondents. The operative portion of the Award of the Tribunal reads as under: ## “Appeal No.37/2009 dated 30.3.2012: Based 0n the above discussion and the conclusions arrived at therefrom, I hold that the impugned award as against the 2[nd] Appellant is liable to be set aside and as against the 1[st] Appellant is to be modified so as to confine future interest only on the amount misappropriated at the rate of 12% per annum till realisation. The impugned award is liable to be interfered with to the above extent. In the result, the award in ARC.6/2007 on the file of the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Kottayam is set aside and an award is- passed allowing the Respondent to realise a sum of Rs.29,21,733/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum on Rs.17,99,159/- from 01-10- ``` WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012 ``` 7 2006 till realisation and costs from the 1[st] appellant and her assets and the disputes as against the 2[nd] appellant is dismissed.” ## “Appeal No.8/2009 dated 30.3.2012: 11. In view of the finding on Point No.3, the impugned award is liable to be set aside to the extent to which it fastened liability on the 2[nd] Appellant. In the result, that part of the award in A.R.C.8608/2005 on the file of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General) Kottayam allowing the respondents to realise the amount awarded from the 2[nd] Appellant and the properties described as Item No.1 and 2 in the schedules of the award is set aside and the respondent is allowed to realise a sum of Rs.6,29,295/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.1,35,090/from 28.2.2005 till its realisation and Rs.1,500/- as arbitration fee and costs from the 1[st] Appellant (1[st] defendant) and her assets.” In this view of the matter, the findings on point No.1 is set aside. Society is at liberty to seek execution of the Award, in accordance with law. Writ petitions stand disposed off. **Sd/-** AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE sou. ``` WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012 ``` 8 ## APPENDIX IN WP(C).19776/2012 ## PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN ARC NO.6/2007 BEFORE THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM - EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE 1[st] DEFENDANT IN ARC NO.6/2007 BEFORE THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM - EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE 2ND DEFENDANT IN ARC NO.6/2007 BEFORE THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM - EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD IN ARC NO.6/2007 BEFORE THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM EXHIBIT P5: PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.3.20 12 IN APPEAL NO. 37/2009 BEFORE THE CO OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ``` WP(C) Nos.19776/2012 & 19777/2012 ``` 9 ## APPENDIX IN WP(C).19777/2012 ## PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN ARC NO.8608/2005 BEFORE THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM - EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE 1[st] DEFENDANT IN ARC NO. 8608/2005 BEFORE THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM - EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE 2[ND] DEFENDANT IN ARC NO.8608/2005 BEFORE THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM - EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD IN ARC NO.8608/2005 BEFORE THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOTTAYAM EXHIBIT P5: PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.3.20 12 IN APPEAL NO. 8/2009 BEFORE THE CO OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM