High Court of KeralaDivision BenchDisposed

DBP No. 49 of 2022 (Suo Motu) - Matter Pertaining to Financial Irregularities by the Temple Advisory Committee, Valliyamkavu Devi Temple

Case / Petition Number:DBP NO. 49 OF 2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
  • Harisankar V. Menon
Judgment Date
2024-03-27
Court Decision / Holding
Dispose of the DBP No. 49 of 2022 without deciding merits, directing the Travancore Devaswom Board to prosecute O.S.323 of 2020 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Peermedu diligently. If there is inordinate delay in the final disposal of O.S.323 of 2020, it is for the Board to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution for expeditious disposal of that suit.
Final Disposition
Disposed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Suo Motu

Respondents

  • State of Kerala
  • Travancore Devaswom Board
  • Devaswom Commissioner Nant hancode, Kowdiar, Thiruvananthapuram
  • Assistant Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board, Kundakkayam Group, Mundakkayam

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Shri G. Biju (Standing Counsel - Travancore Devaswom Board)
  • • Sri S. Rajmohan (Sr Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This Division Bench of the Kerala High Court (Justices Anil K. Narendran and Harisankar V. Menon) exercises suo motu jurisdiction over a matter concerning alleged financial irregularities by the Temple Advisory Committee of Valliyamkavu Devi Temple, Idukki. Registered as DBP No. 49 of 2022 on 26 August 2022, the matter followed an Ombudsman inquiry leading to Report No. 25 of 2023 and connection with O.S. No. 323 of 2020 filed by the Travancore Devaswom Board against the temple committee, currently before the Munsiff Court, Peermedu. The Munsiff’s report dated 18 March 2024 shows that summons were served on defendants 1–4 and 6–14; defendant 5 was not served and the suit against him was dismissed; the remaining defendants have filed written statements and the suit is posted for issues on 14 June 2024. The Court traced the statutory framework: Sections 15A, 16 and 31 of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 (as amended by Act 5 of 2007) and the supervisory role of the Board, to manage Devaswoms and conduct temple rites. It cites Ram Mohan Das v. Travancore Devaswom Board and Suo motu v. State of Kerala for fiduciary duties and parens patriae. Observing pendency of the civil suit, the Court disposes of the DBP without addressing merits, directing the Board to prosecute OS 323/2020 diligently, with power to seek expeditious disposal under Article 227 if delays persist.

Provisions of Law Cited

Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 – Section 15A (as amended by Act 5 of 2007; with effect from 12.04.2007)Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 – Section 16Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 – Section 31Constitution of India, Article 227

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Doctrine of parens patriae
  • Fence eating the crops (metaphor used in context)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The applicants, noting the statutory duties of the Travancore Devaswom Board under Sections 15A, 16 and 31 of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 (as amended), contend that proper administration, timely performance of rites, supervision of officials, and protection of temple properties require vigilant governance and accountability. The Ombudsman’s enquiry and the related civil suit (OS 323 of 2020) before the Munsiff Court Peermedu underscore governance challenges in Valliyamkavu Devi Temple. The Division Bench is urged to ensure diligent prosecution of the civil suit and to consider expeditious disposal under Article 227 if delays occur, aligning with established jurisprudence that casts the Board in a trustee-like role to protect the deity’s assets and public funds. The objective is supervisory, not to adjudicate merits in the DBP at this stage, but to secure prompt, accountable administration and remedy in parallel proceedings.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents emphasize that the civil suit OS 323 of 2020 is ongoing and largely decisive for governance questions; they sought time to obtain instructions and to review the present status. The court’s approach must balance ongoing civil proceedings with fiduciary duties of the Board under the Act, ensuring accountability without prematurely deciding merits in the DBP. The respondents rely on statutory provisions and precedents underscoring the Board’s supervisory role, while accepting the supervisory remedy of directing diligent prosecution of the connected civil suit, and reserving the right to seek Article 227 relief if there is undue delay.

Cited Precedents (3)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Ram Mohan Das v. Travancore Devaswom Board1975 KLT 55PositiveAffirms Board’s trustee-like management of Devaswoms and the ability of worshippers to question improper acts by trustees.
Suo motu v. State of Kerala and others2022 (2) KHC 411PositiveReinforces the Board’s duty to ensure proper administration, supervision, and control of Devaswoms; analogizes the Board to trustees; supports parens patriae doctrine.
Audit Report of the Travancore Devaswom Board for the year 1967-68 (Sabarimala Improvement Fund)1990 (1) KLT 347PositiveLines up public accountability in financial administration and fund management; reinforces vigilance by the Board.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against DBP No. 49 of 2022 (Suo Motu) - Matter Pertaining to Financial Irregularities by the Temple Advisory Committee, Valliyamkavu Devi Temple and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN`** ## **`&`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON ``` ``` WEDNESDAY, THE 27[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` DBP NO. 49OF 2022 ``` ``` MATTER PERTAINING TO FINANCIAL IRREGULARITIES BY THE TEMPLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE IN VALLIYAMKAVU DEVI TEMPLE ``` ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` SUO MOTU ``` ## **`RESPONDENT:`** - **`1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.`** - **`2 TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHENCODE, KOWDIAR POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 003.`** - **`3 DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER NANTHANCODE, KOWDIAR POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.`** - **`4 ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, KUNDAKKAYAM GROUP, MUNDAKKAYAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 513.`** - **`5 THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER VALLIYAMKAVU DEVI TEMPLE, PALOORKAVU P.O., PEERUMEDU TALUK, PERUVANTHANAM VILLAGE, IDUKKI, PIN - 685 532.`** ``` BY ADV SHRI.G.BIJU,SC,TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD ``` ``` OTHER PRESENT: ``` 2 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` ``` SRI S.RAJMOHAN - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER ; SRI G.BIJU - STANDING COUNSEL -TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD ``` ``` THIS DEVASWOM BOARD PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` 3 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` ## **ORDER** ## **Anil K. Narendran, J.** This DBP is registered _suo motu,_ vide proceedings dated 26.08.2022, based on a petition dated nil received alleging various financial irregularities committed by the Temple Advisory Committee of Valliyamkavu Devi Temple, which was in office till the year 2022. 2. On 29.08.2022, when this matter came for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board sought time to get instructions and file an affidavit. 3. By the order dated 11.10.2023, this matter was referred to the learned Ombudsman for enquiry and report. The learned Ombudsman was directed to issue notice to the complainant. 4. After conducting an enquiry, the learned Ombudsman submitted Report No.25 of 2023, wherein the pendency of O.S.No.323 of 2020 filed by the Travancore Devaswom Board before the Munsiff Court, Peerumedu, against the office bearers and members of the Temple Advisory Committee of Valliyamkavu 4 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` Devi Temple, which was holding office till the year 2022, is pointed out. 5. On 09.02.2024, when this DBP came up for consideration along with connected matters, this Court noticed that in O.S.No.323 of 2020 filed by the Travancore Devaswom Board on 07.12.2020, the defendants are yet to file written statement. This Court has already initiated a _suo motu_ proceedings, i.e., DBP.No.72 of 2023, regarding the conduct of litigations before various courts, in which Travancore Devaswom Board, Cochin Devaswom Board or Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee is a party. The learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board sought time to get instructions as to the present status of O.S.No.323 of 2020 pending before the Munsiff Court, Peermade. Thereafter, by the order dated 23.02.2024, Registrar (District Judiciary) was directed to call for a report from the Munsiff Court, Peermade as to the present status of O.S.No.323 of 2020. 6. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Registry has placed on record a report dated 18.03.2024 of the Munsiff Court, Peermade, wherein it is stated that O.S.No.323 of 2020 was instituted before that court on 07.12.2020. Summons 5 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` was served on all defendants except defendant No.5, on 14.12.2020. Since no steps were taken against defendant No.5, the suit against that defendant was dismissed. Defendants 1 to 4 and 6 to 14 filed written statement and the suit now stands posted to 14.06.2024 for framing issues. 7. Heard the learned Senior Government Pleader for the 1[st] respondent and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 to 5. 8. Section 15A of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 inserted by Act 5 of 2007, with effect from 12.04.2007, deals with duties of the Board. As per Section 15A, it shall be the duty of the Board to perform the following functions, namely, (i) to see that the regular traditional rites and ceremonies according to the practice prevalent in the religious institutions are performed promptly; (ii) to monitor whether the administrative officials and employees and also the employees connected with religious rites are functioning properly; (iii) to ensure proper maintenance and upliftment of the Hindu religious institutions; (iv) to establish and maintain proper facilities in the temples for the devotees. Section 16 of the Act deals with supervision and control by the Board. As per Section 16, the Board shall, subject 6 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` to the provisions of Part I of the Act, exercise supervision and control over the acts and proceedings of all officers and servants of the Board and of the Devaswom Department. 9. Section 31 of the Act deals with management of Devaswoms. As per Section 31, subject to the provisions of Part I and the rules made thereunder, the Board shall manage the properties and affairs of the Devaswoms, both incorporated and unincorporated as heretofore, and arrange for the conduct of the daily worship and ceremonies and of the festivals in every temple according to its usage. ## 10. In **Ram Mohan Das v. Travancore Devaswom** **Board [1975 KLT 55]** a learned Single Judge of this Court held that, under Section 31 of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, the Travancore Devaswom Board shall manage the properties and affairs of the Devaswoms, both incorporated and unincorporated and arrange for the conduct of the daily worship and ceremonies and of the festivals in every temple according to its usage. The position of the Board in regard to the Devaswoms - incorporated and unincorporated - is analogous to that of trustees. Any improper act of the trustees could be questioned by a worshipper. 7 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` 11. In **Suo motu v. State of Kerala and others [2022** **(2) KHC 411]** this Court held that in view of the provisions under the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act and the law laid down in the decisions referred to therein, the Travancore Devaswom Board is duty bound to ensure proper administration, supervision and control of the Devaswoms under its management. The Board is duty bound to exercise proper supervision and control over the acts and proceedings of all officers and servants and to manage the properties and affairs of the Devaswoms and conduct daily worships and ceremonies and also festivals in the temple according to its usage. The position of the Board in this regard is analogous to that of trustees, as held by this Court in **Ram Mohan Das [1975 KLT 55]** . Any improper act of the trustees could be questioned by a worshiper. 12. In **Suo motu [2022 (2) KHC 411]** this Court further held that the Travancore Devaswom Board and those entrusted with the duty of managing the properties and affairs of the Devaswoms under its management are duty bound to protect the properties of the deity from any wrongful claims, theft or misappropriation. The position of the Board in this regard is analogous to that of trustees. Any such wrongful claims, theft or 8 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` misappropriation with the passive or active collusion of the authorities concerned, which are acts of ‘fence eating the crops’ should be dealt with sternly. The deity being a perpetual minor, this Court is having inherent jurisdiction to protect and safeguard the interest and properties of the deity and the doctrine of _parens patriae_ will also apply in the exercise of such jurisdiction. 13. In the matter of **Audit Report of the Travancore Devaswom Board for the year 1967-68 (Sabarimala Improvement Fund)** reported in **[1990 (1) KLT 347)** , in the context of Section 32 of the Act, a Division Bench of this Court reminded the President and members of the Travancore Devaswom Board about their public accountability. In the said decision it was made clear that it is for all persons concerned to see that greater vigil is exercised by the President and members of the Board in the overall administration of the Board and in the collection and disbursement of funds. 14. The complaint, based on which this DBP is registered _suo motu_ , vide proceedings dated 26.08.2022, contains allegations regarding various financial irregularities committed by the Temple Advisory Committee of Valliyamkavu Devi Temple, which was in office till the year 2022. O.S.No.323 of 2020 9 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` instituted by the Travancore Devaswom Board against the office bearers and members of that Temple Advisory Committee is now pending before the Munsiff Court, Peermedu, which now stands posted to 14.06.2024 for framing issues. In view of the pendency of that suit before the competent civil court, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this DBP, without going into the merits of the case, by directing the Travancore Devaswom Board to prosecute O.S.No.323 of 2020 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Peermedu, diligently. In case there is inordinate delay in the final disposal of O.S.No.323 of 2020, it is for the Board to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for expeditious disposal of that suit. Sd/- ## **ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE** Sd/- ## **HARISANKAR V. MENON, JUDGE** Skk//03.04.2024 10 ``` DBP NO. 49 OF 2022 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF DBP NO. 49 OF 2022`** ## **`' - PETITIONER S ANNEXURES:`** ``` ANNEXURE 1 REPORT OF THE STATE AUDIT OF TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD DATED 28.12.2022 ANNEXURE 2 STATEMENT OF THE TEMPLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNEXURE 3 REPORT DATED 27.12.2022 FILED BY THE DEVASWOM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ANNEXURE 4 REMARKS FILED BY THE SENIOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF KERALA STATE AUDIT, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD AUDIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ANNEXURE 5 REPORT DATED 30.05.2023 OF THE DEVASWOM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ANNEXURE 6 STATEMENT DATED 22.05.2023 OF THE TEMPLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ```