Darshana T P v. Jayasankar
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- K. Harilal
- C. S. Dias
- Judgment Date
- 2019-12-02
- Court Decision / Holding
- OP (FC).No.596 OF 2019 disposed of: I.A 2/2019 allowed to waive the six-month waiting period; I.A 1/2019 allowed; the marriage solemnised on 10.5.1998 is dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act; the Memorandum of Agreement dated 8.11.2019 is recorded and forms part of the judgment; the parties shall comply with its terms; costs borne by each party.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed (divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B; MOA recorded; six-month waiting period waived)
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Darshana T P
Respondents
- Jayasankar
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Shri. Anoop Krishna
- • Smti. Jenny Thankam
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri. Ravi Krishnan
Case Synopsis & Summary
This is a High Court of Kerala jurisdiction under Article 227 concerning OP (FC) No.596 of 2019, filed by Darshana T P (the respondent in OP No.39/2017, Family Court Palakkad) against Jayasankar. The matter arose after mediation where the parties reached a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on 8.11.2019, signed by both sides and counsels, settling all disputes arising from their marriage. The parties, who were married on 10 May 1998 and separated on 6 December 2016, stated there is no collusion and no possibility of reconciliation. They filed I.A 1/2019 under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act for a decree of divorce by mutual consent and I.A 2/2019 seeking to waive the six-month waiting period. The court, after interacting with the parties, noted the MOA and the mediation report, and relied on the Supreme Court decision Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746 to permit waiving the statutory six-month period. Consequently, I.A 2/2019 was allowed to waive the period, I.A 1/2019 was allowed to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent, the MOA was recorded as part of the judgment, and each party was directed to comply. Costs were to be borne by the parties.
Provisions of Law Cited
Legal Doctrines & Maxims
- Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The applicant submits that the parties have settled all matrimonial disputes by a Memorandum of Agreement dated 8.11.2019, there is no collusion, there is no likelihood of rapprochement, and they seek a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B, with waiver of the six-month waiting period in light of Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondent adopts the same facts, consents to dissolution by mutual consent, supported by the MOA and affidavits, and requests expedited disposal by the court, including waiver of the statutory period.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur | (2017) 8 SCC 746 | Positive | The court relies on this Supreme Court decision to justify waiving the six-month waiting period under Section 13B in the facts of the case. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Darshana T P v. Jayasankar and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.