High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeCases disposed; three Crl.M.Cs allowed and proc...

CRL.M.C Nos. 5784/2022, 5759/2022 and 5816/2022 v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:CRL.M.C Nos. 5784/2022, 5759/2022, 5816/2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Dr. Kauser Edappagath
Judgment Date
2022-12-02
Court Decision / Holding
Crl.M.C Nos. 5784/2022, 5759/2022 and 5816/2022 are allowed. All further proceedings pursuant to Crime Nos. 314/2022, 907/2022, and 2353/2021 of Thiruvalla Police Station are quashed.
Final Disposition
Cases disposed; three Crl.M.Cs allowed and proceedings quashed in all connected crimes.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • XXXXXXXXXX

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala
  • XXXXXXXXXX (Defacto Complainant)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • T.P. Pradeep
  • • P.K. Sathees Kumar
  • • Minikumary M.V.
  • • R.K. Prasanth
  • • Jijo Joseph

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Unni. K. K. (Ezhumattoor)
  • • P.G. Manu
  • • Smt. T.V. Neema

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a consolidated order of a single-judge bench (Honourable Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath) of the Kerala High Court dealing with three connected Criminal Miscellaneous Cases (Crl.M.C. Nos. 5784/2022, 5759/2022 and 5816/2022) arising from Thiruvalla Police Station offenses. The accused and the victim in all three cases are married persons who reportedly had a consensual relationship over a period, including visits to lodges and two rented houses, followed by tribulations in the marriage. The prosecutions allege offenses including rape and related crimes under IPC sections such as 366, 376(2)(n), 403, and 420 (in Crime 314/2022) and 376(2)(n), 323, 506 (in Crime 907/2022), and 376(2)(n) (in Crime 2353/2021). All three cases have been amicably settled between the parties, with the victim stating she does not wish to press the matter further. The Public Prosecutor and the investigating officer corroborate the amicable settlement. Relying on a recent Kerala High Court decision (XXX v State of Kerala, 2022 KHC 296), the court holds that the alleged promise of marriage to a married woman is unenforceable in law and cannot sustain a conviction under Section 376 IPC. Consequently, the court allows the three Crl.M.Cs and quashes all further proceedings in the connected crimes.

Provisions of Law Cited

366 IPC376(2)(n) IPC403 IPC420 IPC450 IPC341 IPC323 IPC195A IPC506 IPC

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Unenforceable promise to marry is not a basis for conviction under Section 376 IPC; such promises are not enforceable in law.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The accused, who are married to the victim, engaged in a consensual relationship; the dispute is settled amicably. The court is urged to quash prosecution under IPC for 376 and related offenses in light of the settlement and the lack of coercion, severely contested element of rape, and the unenforceability of a promise of marriage to a married woman as per controlling authority (XXX v State of Kerala).

Contentions of Respondents

The prosecution notes the allegations in the FIRs but records that the victim desires amicable settlement; contends that the matter has been investigated and the records reviewed. It relies on the factual matrix that the relationship was consensual and seeks to ensure law and order while recognising the settlement.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
XXX v State of Kerala2022 KHC 296PositiveThe court cites this decision to hold that a promise to marry a married woman is unenforceable in law and cannot justify a conviction under Section 376 IPC, forming part of the rationale for quashing the cases.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against CRL.M.C Nos. 5784/2022, 5759/2022 and 5816/2022 v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH** **FRIDAY, THE 2[ND] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944** **CRL.MC NO. 5784 OF 2022** **CRIME NO.314/2022 OF Thiruvalla Police Station,** **Pathanamthitta** ## **PETITIONER/ACCUSED:** XXXXXXXXXX BY ADVS.T.P.PRADEEP P.K.SATHEES KUMAR MINIKUMARY M.V., R.K.PRASANTH JIJO JOSEPH ## **RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:** 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA - 682031 2 XXXXXXXXXX BY ADV UNNI. K K(EZHUMATTOOR) SRI. P.G. MANU, SR. PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.12.2022, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.5759/2022, 5816/2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:2:- ## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 2[ND] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 CRL.MC NO. 5759 OF 2022** **CRIME NO.907/2022 OF Thiruvalla Police Station,** ## **Pathanamthitta** ## **PETITIONER/ACCUSED:** XXXXXXXXXX BY ADVS.T.P.PRADEEP P.K.SATHEES KUMAR, MINIKUMARY M.V. R.K.PRASANTH, JIJO JOSEPH ## **RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:** 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA - 682031 2 XXXXXXXXXX BY ADV UNNI. K K(EZHUMATTOOR) SMT. T.V. NEEMA, SR. PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.12.2022, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.5784/2022 AND CONNECTED CASE, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:3:- ## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 2[ND] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 CRL.MC NO. 5816 OF 2022** **CRIME NO.2353/2021 OF Thiruvalla Police Station,** ## **Pathanamthitta** ## **PETITIONER/ACCUSED:** XXXXXXXXXX BY ADVS.T.P.PRADEEP P.K.SATHEES KUMAR, MINIKUMARY M.V. R.K.PRASANTH, JIJO JOSEPH ## **RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:** 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA - 682031 2 XXXXXXXXXX BY ADV UNNI. K K(EZHUMATTOOR) SRI. P.G. MANU, SR. PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.12.2022, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.5784/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 ## -:4:- ## **O R D E R** Dated this the 2[nd] day of December, 2022 The accused and the victim in all the above three Crl.M.Cs are one and the same. The allegations in all these cases are also identical. All the cases are settled between the parties. Hence, I am disposing of all these cases together. 2. I am referring the parties as the accused and the victim. Admittedly, the accused and the victim are married and having children. Both of them were not in good terms with their respective spouses. Both of them fell in love, visited so many places all over the country, stayed in lodges and also lived together in rental house for months and had consensual sexual intercourse. It appears that, thereafter, the relationship got strained which led to the institution of three crimes which are the subject matter of the above three Crl.M.Cs. 3. Crl.M.C No.5816/2022 pertains to Crime No. Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:5:- 2353/2021 of Thiruvalla Police Station. The offences alleged therein are punishable under Sections 366, 376(2) (n), 403 and 420 of IPC. The prosecution allegation therein is that, the accused, after giving false promise of marriage to the victim, conducted a namesake 'Thalikettu' at the temple, had physical relationship with her on several occasions and further obtained gold ornaments and money from her and thereafter, withdrew from the promise and thus cheated her. 4. Crl.M.C.No.5784/2022 pertains to Crime No.314/2022 of Thiruvalla Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 450, 341, 323, 376(2)(n), 195A and 506 of IPC. The prosecution allegation therein is that, the accused and his wife trespassed into the hotel room of the victim where she and her children resided and threatened her to withdraw the case registered against the accused and thereafter, the accused committed rape on her, threatened her and obtained signature in an affidavit to withdraw the case. 5. Crl.M.C.No.5759/2022 pertains to Crime No.907/2022 of Thiruvalla Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:6:- under Sections 376(2)(n), 323 and 506 of IPC. The prosecution allegation therein is that the accused after giving false promise of marriage to the victim, enticed her to the lodge and committed sexual intercourse and thereafter assaulted her. 6. I have heard Sri. T.P. Pradeep, the learned counsel for the accused, Sri.Unni K.K., the learned counsel for the victim and Smt.T.V. Neema, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. 7. The victim entered appearance through counsel and an affidavit had been sworn in by her. The averments in the petition as well as the affidavit sworn in by the victim would show that the entire dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and the victim had decided not to proceed with the crime any further. The learned Prosecutor, on instruction, submits that the matter was enquired into through the investigating officer and a statement of the victim was also recorded wherein she reported that the matter was amicably settled. 8. It is true, in all the cases offence under Section 376 is alleged. However, a perusal of the FIS as well as the materials collected would show that the offence punishable under Section Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:7:- 376 of IPC is not attracted. As stated already, the accused and the victim are married persons. A reading of the FIS would show that the accused and the victim went to several places, resided together in lodges and had consensual sex. It would further show that both of them lived together in two rented houses for months and had consensual sex. It is true, in one of the cases (Crime No.314/2022) there is an allegation of forceful sex. However, on evaluation of the entire case of the victim and on a reading of the entire records, it would show that the sex the victim had with the accused was purely consensual in nature. She alleges that she consented for sex persuaded by the false promise of marriage given by the accused. Recently, this Court in _**XXX v** ._ _**State of Kerala**_ (2022 KHC 296) has held that the promise alleged to have been made by the accused to a married woman that he would marry her is a promise which is not enforceable in law. Such an unenforceable and illegal promise cannot be a basis for the prosecution under Section 376 of IPC. Here, no question of promise to marry arise, since, the victim is a married woman and the accused is a married man and she knew Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:8:- that legal marriage with the petitioner was not possible under the law. Hence, the basic ingredients of Section 376 of IPC are not attracted. That apart, the entire dispute between the parties is already settled. For the reasons stated above, no purpose will be served in proceeding further against the accused. Accordingly, above three Crl.M.Cs are allowed. All further proceedings pursuant to Crime Nos.314/2022, 907/2022 and 2353/2021 of Thiruvalla Police Station hereby stands quashed. **Sd/-** ## **DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH** **JUDGE** ## **kp** Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:9:- ## **APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5784/2022** PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR NO.314/22 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION DATED 28/2/2022 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 1/7/2022 Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:10:- ## **APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5759/2022** PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR NO.907/22 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION DATED 15/5/2022 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 1/7/2022 Crl.M.C.Nos. 5784, 5759 & 5816 of 2022 -:11:- ## **APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5816/2022** PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR NO.2353/22 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION DATED 20/11/2021 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 1/7/2022