CRL.MC No. 4339 of 2022
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- The Hon'ble Mr. Justice ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
- Judgment Date
- 2022-07-11
- Court Decision / Holding
- CRL.MC 4339 of 2022 is allowed; all further proceedings in Crime No.453/2017 and S.C.No.32/2019 before the Assistant Sessions Court, Manjeri, are quashed; Annexure A1 final report and related proceedings are closed.
- Final Disposition
- Quashed
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- YASHIQ NAIZAM P
- SUHAIL K
- MUHAMMED IQBAL V.P
- SHABEERALI N.K @ KOCHU
- HATHIF BABU
- K.MOHAMMEDALI @ K.K.B
- JAISAL K.N
- SHAJAHAN KINNATTINGAL
- SAJARUDHEEN MOIDU
- ABDUL SHUKKOOR C.K
- SIRAJUDHEEN
Respondents
- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM., PIN – 682031
- BABU RAHIMAN M AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL HAMEED, MADAYI HOUSE, ERIYAD, KOLAPARAMBA P.O, PANDIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN – 676522
- MOHAMMED FASIL M.C AGED 25 YEARS, S/O. ASHRAF ALI, MANNUNGACHALI HOUSE, KUTHUKAL ROAD, KARUVAMBRAM P.O, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN – 676123
- MOHAMMED SHAFEEQ U.P AGED 25 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL KAREEM, OOROTHPARAMBAN HOUSE, MUNDITHODIKA, POOKKOTTUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN – 676517
- HAFSAL RAHMAN AGED 27 YEARS, S/O. ASHRAF, POOLAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUTTIPALAM, MANJERI P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN – 676121
- JASIR M AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. SHOUKATHALI, MADASSERI HOUSE, KANDALAPATTA, KARAKKUNNU P.O, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN – 676123
- ABHIJITH V AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. RAMU, SOUMYA NIVAS, MULLAMPARA, MANJERI P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN – 676121
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • K.ABOOBACKER SIDHEEQUE
Counsels for Respondents
- • K.V.WINSTON
- • SREEJA V -SR PP
Case Synopsis & Summary
This is a Kerala High Court Criminal Miscellaneous Case (CRL.MC 4339 of 2022) arising from Crime No.453/2017 of Manjeri Police Station, currently SC 32/2019 before the Assistant Sessions Court, Manjeri. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 11 seek to quash further proceedings on the ground that the dispute with the injured respondents has been settled and they bear no subsisting grievance. The alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code include sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 308 read with section 149. The prosecution claims that on 22.09.2017, the petitioners assaulted respondents 2 to 7 during a victory march by the Students Federation of India, motivated by political animosity; however, the private nature of the dispute and the parties' settlement are the central facts. Annexures A2 to A7 are affidavits by the injured stating no grievance and no objection to quashing; Annexure A1 is the final report. The SHO verified the settlement and reiterated the absence of grievance. The State's Public Prosecutor and the injured-party respondents confirmed the lack of objection to quashing. The court found that continuing proceedings would serve no purpose and, relying on Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, invoked its 482 CrPC powers to quash and dispose of the SC 32/2019 proceedings. The quashing orders end the case against the petitioners.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners submit that the dispute between them and the injured respondents has been settled amicably, as evidenced by Annexures A2–A7; the injured have sworn affidavits stating no subsisting grievance and no objection to quashing. The SHO has verified the settlement and the injured persons reiterate their lack of grievance before the court. The private nature of the dispute and the lack of public interest in continuing proceedings justify exercise of the court's jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the proceedings, especially since one of the offences involves no serious injuries and no criminal antecedents are shown. Relying on Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another (2012 (4) KLT 108), the petitioners contend that continuance serves no useful purpose and the proceedings should be quashed to avoid fruitless prosecution and to uphold the private settlement between parties.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents/injured persons and the State Public Prosecutor confirm that the dispute is private and that the injured have no subsisting grievance. They have no objection to quashing the ongoing proceedings in Crime No.453/2017 and S.C.No.32/2019, given the settlement and lack of continuing grievance. The State's representative aligns with this view, and since no serious injuries or adverse criminal antecedents have been established, there is no public interest in pursuing the case. The court is urged to consider the private resolution and the absence of ongoing harm as grounds to exercise its 482 Cr.P.C powers to dismiss the proceedings.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another | 2012(4) KLT 108 | Positive | Court relied on Gian Singh to exercise power under 482 Cr.P.C to quash where the dispute is private and the parties have settled, indicating no subsisting grievance. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against CRL.MC No. 4339 of 2022 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.