High CourtSingle JudgeAppeals dismissed. No costs.

Continental Profiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi

Case / Petition Number:Civil Appeal Nos. 4904-4905 of 2002
Neutral Citation:Continental Profiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi, (2007) 7 S.C.R. 749

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • Dr. Arijit Pasayat
  • Lokeshwar Singh Pant
Judgment Date
2007-05-21
Court Decision / Holding
Appeals dismissed. No costs.
Final Disposition
Appeals dismissed. No costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Continental Profiles Ltd.

Respondents

  • Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Suruchi Aggarwal
  • • Sarlonki

Counsels for Respondents

  • • T. M. Mohd. Youseff, Sr. Adv.; T. V. Ratnam; B. Krishna Prasad

Case Synopsis & Summary

This appeal concerns the correct classification of ‘Actuators’ under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Continental Profiles Ltd. argued that Electric Valve Actuators should be classified under heading 85.43, relying on decisions such as Guindy Machines Pvt. Ltd. (1999) 113 ELT 610 and Audco India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (1999) 106 ELT 524, which suggested actuators were not classifiable under heading 85.01. The Revenue contended that actuators fall under heading 85.01, citing Siemens (Bombay) Ltd. case (2000) 119 ELT 167, and that the matter did not warrant reference to a Larger Bench. The Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) dismissed the appeals, supporting classification under 85.01. The Supreme Court examined the scope and structure of Chapter 85, including the Explanatory Notes, and clarified that electric motors and generators (including valve actuators comprising an electric motor with gears and drive shaft) fall within 85.01. It distinguished Guindy’s decision, rejected conflicting views, and aligned with Siemens’ reasoning that 85.01 governs the Actuator device. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed with no costs. The judgment provides guidance on tariff interpretation for actuators and resolves conflicting authorities on classification.

Provisions of Law Cited

Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Schedule, Heading 85.01 and 85.43Chapter 85, Section XVIGeneral Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN)Explanatory Notes to HS Code 84.53 and 84.85 (headings related to motors and actuators)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The appellant contends that Actuators should be classifiable under heading 85.43, supported by precedents such as Guindy Machines Pvt. Ltd. and Audco India Ltd., arguing that conflicting decisions necessitate reference to a Larger Bench. They emphasize that HS Explanatory Notes and tariff structure permit classification under 85.43 for actuators used as components with other equipment.

Contentions of Respondents

The Revenue argues that actuators, including electric valve actuators, are properly classifiable under heading 85.01, citing Siemens (Bombay) Ltd. and distinguishing Guindy’s Electromechanical Actuator as a part and accessory for machines in heading 84.56-84.65. They contend that the larger framework of Chapter 85 encompasses such devices as electric motors or parts that drive mechanical components, and that the tribunal correctly applied 85.01.

Cited Precedents (3)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
CCE v. Guindy Machines Pvt. Ltd.(1999) 113 ELT 610DistinguishedGuindy’s Electromechanical Actuator case was distinguished by the Tribunal when Siemens' case was applied; the product in Guindy was treated as a part/accessory to machines listed under 84.56-84.65, not governing the 85.01 classification at issue here.
Audco India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs(1999) 106 ELT 524DistinguishedAudco stood for a different interpretation that actuators were not classifiable under 85.01; the Court did not adopt this view in light of Siemens and the present analysis.
CCE Bombay C v. Siemens Ltd.(2000) 119 ELT 167PositiveSiemens' case was treated as controlling, supporting classification under 85.01 for actuators, and was applied by the Tribunal and endorsed by the Court as the guiding ratio.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Continental Profiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

A ## MIS. CONTINENT AL PROFILES LTD. # _v._ COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI MAY 21, 2007 [DR. ARIJIT PASA Y AT AND LOKESHWAR SINGH PANT A, JJ.] _Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985-Schedule, Heading 85.01and85.43'A<;tuators'-Classification of-Held: Actuators are classifiable under sub Heading 85.01._ c With regard to classification of 'Electric Valve Actuator', it was the appellant's case that they were classifiable under sub Heading 85.43 relying on _*Guindy Machine Pvt. Ltd's_ case and ** ~udco India Ltd.'s case and respondent-revenue case was that they were classifiable under sub Heading 85.01 of schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 relying on D _***Seimen's_ case, and as such there were conflicting in decisions in the matter. Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants. Hence the present appeals. Respondent-Revenue contended that Guindy's case was distinguished , by the Tribunal in _Seimens'_ case by holding that the 'Electromechanical Actuator' was considered as a part and accessory suitable for use solely or principally with the machine of heading Nos. 84.56 to 84.65 and as such reference of the matter to the Larger Bench was not called for and Seimens' case was applicable; and that 'Eledric Valve Actuator' falls under heading 85.01. ## Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1. So far as other non-electric goods falling in Heading 84.85 are concerned in Heading 85.01 it is to be noted that the same relates to electric motors and generators excluding generating sets. 'Electric Motors are machines for transforming electrical energy into mechanical power'. 'G This group includes rotary motors and linear motors. Para 3 of the group reads 'valve actuato~, electrical, consisting of an electric motor with reducing gear and drive shaft and in some cases, with various devices (electric starter, 747 H 748 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2007] 7 S.C.R. A transformer, hand wheel, etc.) to operate the valve plug". ·,,. (Paras 7 and 81 (750-F, G; 751-AI 1.2. In order to be covered by heading 84.53 (a) the same must relate to electric machines and apparatus with individual functions (b) must not be specified or included elsewhere in the Chapter. Thus, the view of the CEGAT B does not suffer from any infirmity to warrant interference. (Paras 9 and IOI (751-8, q *CC£v. _Guindy Machines Pvt. Ltd,_ (1999) 113 ELT 619; _**Audco India Ltd_ v. _Commissioner of Customs,_ (1999) 106 ELT 524 and ***CC£, _Bombay_ C v. _Seimens (/)Ltd,_ (2000) 119 ELT 167, referred to. ·~ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 4904-4905 of 2002. From the Final Order No. 553-554/2001-8 dated 13.12.2001 of the Customs, D Excise and Gold(Control) Appellate Tribunal, New.Delhi in Appeal No. E/1682; 1916/01-B. ## Suruchii Aggarwal and Sarlonki for the Appellant. .I. _.j;._ ,, In·_, T.M. Mohd. Youseff, Sr. Adv., T.V. Ratnam and _B:_ Krishna Prasad for E the Respondent. > The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. I. Challenge in these appeals is to th_e order passed by Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi F (in short the 'CEGAT'). By a common order CEGA T dismissed the two appeals filed by the appellant. The issue involved in the appeals was whether "Actuators" were classifiable under sub~heading 85.43 as claimed by the appellant or under heading 85.0 I of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (in short the 'Tariff Act') as contended by the revenue. The demand made was confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The stand of G the appellant before the CEGA T was that in CC£ v. _Guindy Machines Pvt. Ltd.,_ (1999) 113 ELT-610 and in the case of _Audco India ltd._ v. _Commissioner of Customs_ ( 1999) I 06 EL T 524 it has held that "Actuators" are not classifiable _ under heading 85.01. Commissioner (Appeal) relied on the decision in CC£,-•:. _Bombay_ v. _Seimens (/)ltd,_ (2000) 119 ELT- 167 where it was held that the H "Actuators" were classifiable under Heading 85.0 I. thus there were conflicting CONTINENT AL PROFILES LTD. 1•. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI [PASA Y AT, J.] 749 A , _,../" _)_ - ## decisions in the matter. 2. Learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that _Guindy's_ case (supra) was distinguished by the Tribunal in _Seimens'_ case (supra) by observing that the product involved in the said case was "Electromechanical Actuator" which was. considered as a part and accessory suitable for use solely or principally with the machine of heading Nos. 84.56 to 84.65. In that view of B the matter there is no necessity to refer to the matter to the Larger Bench. The Tribunal referred to the decisions and with reference to the factual position held that the view in _Seimens' case_ (supra) was applicable. Factually it was noticed that Electric Valve Actuator falls under heading 85.01 and there is no contrary mention in the Central Excise Tariff. The product is to be c classified under Heading 85.01 only. With reference to the write up on Electrical Actuator it was found that these are required to regulate flow. The distinction with _Guindy's case_ (supra) was noticed by observing that the product involved was "Electromechanical Actuator" which was considered as part and accessories suitable for use solely or principally with the machines of Heading Nos. 84.56 to 84.65. Reference was also made to the Explanatory D Notes of H.S.N. '\ 3. In support of the appeal, the stands taken before the CEGAT was reiterated. It was submitted that the HSN can be relied on if goods are identical. In these cases goods are not identical. E 4. In Section XVI, Chapter 85 GEN, it is noted as follows: ## (A) SCOPE AND STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER This Chapter covers all electrical machinery and equipment, other than; F _"I._ x (a) Machinery and apparatus of a kind covered by Chapter 84, which remains classified there even if electric (see the General Explanatory Note to that Chapter), and (b) Certain goods excluded from the Section as a whole (see the General Explanatory Note to Section XVI). 5. Contrary to the rules in Chapter 84, the goods of this Chapter remain classified here, even if they are of ceramic materials or glass, with the exception of glass envelopes (including bulbs and tubes) of heading 70.11. ## 6. This Chapter covers: H _1Sll_ SUPREME COURT REPORTS <it. ").., _.1_ /•' (2007) 7 S.C.R. A (I) Machines and apparatus for the production, transformation or storage of electricity, e.g., generators, transformers, etc. (85.01to85.04) and primary cells (heading 85.06) and accumulators (heading 85.07) (2) Certain electro-mechanical apparatus, e.g., electromechanical tools ._ B[for working ] 85 09), and whavers and hair clippers (heading[in ][the hand (heading ][85 ][08), certain domestic appliances (heading · ] 85 10) (3) Certain machines and appliances which depend for their operation on the properties or effects of electricity, such as its electro-magnetic effects, _1i·_ ' heating properties, etc. (headings 85.05, 8511 to 85.18, 85.25 to 85.31 and 85.43) c ), . (4) Instruments and appliances for recording or reproducing sound; ~t video recorders or reproducers; parts and· accessories for such instruments and appliances (heading 85.19 to 85.22). D (5) Recording media for sound or similar recording of other phenomena (including video recording media, but excluding photographic or cinematographic films of Chapter 37) (headings 85.23 and 85.24). _f._ (6) Certain electrical goods not generally used independently, but designed to play a particular role as components, in electrical equipment, e.g. E[capacitors (heading 85.32, switches, fuses, junction boxes, etc. (heading 85.35 ] or 85.36), lamps (heading 85.39), thermionic, etc., valves and tubes (heading 85.40), transistors and similar semiconductor devices (heading 85 .41 ), electrical carbons (heading 85.45). _t_ (7) Certain articles and materials which are used in electrical apparatus F[and equipment because ][of ][their conducting or insulating properties, such as ] insulated electric wire and assemblies thereof (heading 85.44) , insulators (heading 85.46), insulating fittings and metal conduit tubing with an interior insulating lining (heading 85.47). i .~ 7. So far as other non-electric goods falling in Heading 84.85 are G concerned in Heading 85.01 it is to be noted that the same relates to.electric motors and generators excluding generating sets the details of electric motors are indicated to mention as follows: H "Electric motors are machines for transforming ele"ctrical energy into mechanical power." _J, I_ CONTINENTAL PROFILES LID.''· COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEWDELHI [PASAYAT,J.I 751 _r_ 8. This group includes rotary motors and linear motors. It would be ·A relevant to quote para 3 of the group which reads as follows: "(3) Valve actuators, electrical, consisting of an electric motor wit!) reducing gear and drive shaft and in some cases, with various devices (electric starter, transformer, hand wheel, etc.) to operate the valve plug." B 9. In order to be covered by heading 84.43 (a) the same must relate tt> electric machines and apparatus with individual functions (b) must not be specified or included elsewhere in the Chapter. IO. Above being the position the view of the CEGA T does not sutJ:er from any infirmity to warrant interference. 11. Appeals are dismissed. No costs. NJ. Appeals dismissed. . ..