High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeCriminal Revision Petitions allowed; quashed pr...

Consolidated CRL.MC petitions and Criminal Revision Petitions challenging SC 1130/2007, Abkari Act investigations before the High Court of Kerala: Sunilkumar; Jayachandran; Anilkumar; Ajayakum ar; Muraleedharan; Vijayan @ Parassuvakkal Vijayan; Babu @ Babuji; Muhammed Rafi (CRL.MC Nos. 238/2015; 202/2015; 206/2015; 237/2015; 239/2015; Crl.Rev.Pet Nos. 2104/2014; 2160/2014; Crl.M.C Nos. 7090/2014; 202/2015; 206/2015; 207/2015; 237/2015; 238/2015; 239/2015)

Case / Petition Number:CRL.MC Nos. 238/2015; 202/2015; 206/2015; 237/2015; 239/2015; Crl.Rev.Pet Nos. 2104/2014; 2160/2014; Crl.M.C Nos. 7090/2014; 202/2015; 206/2015; 207/2015; 237/2015; 238/2015; 239/2015

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • P. V. Kunhikrishnan
Judgment Date
2023-10-18
Court Decision / Holding
The Criminal Revision Petitions are allowed. The impugned orders in the connected Crl.M.Cs and the final report/investigation are quashed. The proceedings against the petitioners in Sessions Case No.1130 of 2007 are quashed, and the petitioners are discharged under Section 227 CrPC. The court holds that the investigation by non-notified Abkari Officers renders the proceedings void for lack of jurisdiction and that Abkari offences cannot be pursued on the basis of such incompetent investigation.
Final Disposition
Criminal Revision Petitions allowed; quashed proceedings and discharged petitioners under Section 227 CrPC; impugned orders quashed; investigation by non-notified Abkari Officers invalidated.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sunilkumar S/O Velukutty (late)
  • Jayachandran
  • Anilkum ar S/O LATE Velukutty
  • Ajayakumar S/O LATE Velayudha Panicker
  • Muraleedharan S/O Sudhakaran
  • VIJAYAN @ PARASSUVAKAL VIJAYAN
  • MURALEEDHARAN? (MURALEEDHARAN)
  • Muhammed Rafi

Respondents

  • State of Kerala (represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sunilkumar: Suman Chakravarthy; Sandeep T. George
  • • Jayachandran: Celine Wilfred; Suman Chakravarthy
  • • Anilkum ar: Suman Chakravarthy; Brejitha Unnikrishnan
  • • Ajayakumar: Suman Chakravarthy; K.R. Rija
  • • Muraleedharan: Suman Chakravarthy; Brejitha Unnikrishnan
  • • VIJAYAN: P. Vijaya Bhanu (Sr.); M. Revikrishnan; Vipin Narayan
  • • Muhammed Rafi: Nireesh Mathew

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala; Government Pleader (in some connected matters)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a batch of connected criminal petitions before the Kerala High Court, led by Justice P. V. Kunhikrishnan, challenging the investigation and final reports in Sessions Case No. 1130 of 2007 arising from Crime No. 116 of 2003 (Nemom Police) and related offences under the Abkari Act and IPC. The petitioners argue that the final report was filed by officers not competent under the Abkari Act, specifically by officers not notified Abkari Officers under Section 4 of the Abkari Act, per SRO 321/1996. The petitioners rely on decisions in Sujith v. State of Kerala and Jil v. State of Kerala to contend that investigation by non-notified officers renders the proceedings void for want of proper authority. The respondents dispute the contention, asserting the reports were valid and within the government’s powers. After hearing, the court agrees with the petitioners, holding that the investigation was conducted by officers not empowered as Abkari Officers, invalidating the final report and depriving the court of jurisdiction. The court discharges the petitioners under CrPC 227 and quashes the charge, quashing all proceedings in the related cases. The decision emphasizes the necessity of proper Abkari Officer authority for investigation in Abkari cases.

Provisions of Law Cited

Abkari Act, s. 8(1)Abkari Act, s. 8(2)Abkari Act, s. 55(a)Abkari Act, s. 55(i)Abkari Act, s. 58Abkari Act, s. 4 (notification under s.4)SRO 321/96 (Notification under s.4 of Abkari Act)Abkari Act, ss. 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 59Abkari Act, s. 55D (conspiracy)IPC, s. 120BIPC, s. 201IPC, s. 34CrPC, s. 227

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners argued that the final report in SC 1130/2007 and related proceedings was prepared by officers who were not competent Abkari Officers under the Abkari Act. They relied on the government notification under Section 4 of the Abkari Act (SRO 321/96) which restricted Abkari investigation powers to notified officers. Since CW-61 and CW-62 (Deputy SPs of CBCID and Narcotics) who conducted further investigation were not Abkari Officers empowered under the notification, there was no valid cognizable extent for the case. They also argued that IPC offences included in the charge are dependent on Abkari offences and cannot stand independently. They urged discharge under CrPC 227 and quashing of proceedings.

Contentions of Respondents

The State contended the investigation and final report were validly filed by officers vested with authority by government notifications and insubordinate officers cannot invalidate a case. The government highlighted the necessity of a proper Abkari Officer to handle Abkari cases, and that the reporting officers were acting within the scope of their duties as per the notification, supported by prior precedents. The court’s task was to assess the authority of the investigating officers and the jurisdiction to proceed.

Cited Precedents (5)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sujith v. State of Kerala2016 (3) KHC 823PositiveThe court refers to Sujith to support the proposition that an investigation conducted by officers not empowered as Abkari Officers under the notification cannot sustain proceedings.
Jil v. State of Kerala2017 (3) KLT 156PositiveThe court cites Jil to reinforce the same reasoning about the necessity of proper Abkari Officer authority for investigation.
Saji @ Kochumon v. State of Kerala2010 (3) KLJ 471Mentioned OnlyAnnexed as a supporting authority; not specifically discussed in the judgment’s reasoning.
A.N. Rajan v. State of Kerala2014 (3) KLJ 720Mentioned OnlyAnnexed in Appendix; not a central part of the judgment’s analysis.
Hashim v. Asst. Sub Inspector2014 (2) KLT 346Mentioned OnlyAnnexed in Appendix; not a central part of the judgment’s analysis.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Consolidated CRL.MC petitions and Criminal Revision Petitions challenging SC 1130/2007, Abkari Act investigations before the High Court of Kerala: Sunilkumar; Jayachandran; Anilkumar; Ajayakum ar; Muraleedharan; Vijayan @ Parassuvakkal Vijayan; Babu @ Babuji; Muhammed Rafi (CRL.MC Nos. 238/2015; 202/2015; 206/2015; 237/2015; 239/2015; Crl.Rev.Pet Nos. 2104/2014; 2160/2014; Crl.M.C Nos. 7090/2014; 202/2015; 206/2015; 207/2015; 237/2015; 238/2015; 239/2015) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 ``` ``` CRL.MC NO. 238 OF 2015 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL ``` ``` SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` SUNILKUMAR S/O.VELUKUTTY (LATE), PRAVEENA COTTAGE, TC NO.24/160, METTUKKADA, THYCAUD VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SRI.SANDEEP T.GEORGE ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031 ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.202/2015, 206/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -2Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 202 OF 2015 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` JAYACHANDRAN AGED 53 YEARS S/O KRISHNAN, ANJALI HOUSE, MUKKOLACKAL, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SMT.CELINE WILFRED SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.238/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -3Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 206 OF 2015 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` ANILKUMAR ``` ``` S/O LATE VELUKUTTY, PRAVEEN COTTAGE, TC 24/160, METTUKADA, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SMT.BREJITHA UNNIKRISHNAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.238/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -4Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN ``` ``` WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 207 OF 2015 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` SUNILKUMAR @ SUDHEVAN S/O VASUDEVA PANICKER, ABIRAMI, ARYANADU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SMT.K.R.RIJA ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.238/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -5Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 237 OF 2015 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` AJAYAKUMAR S/O.LATE VELAYUDHA PANICKER, VELLAMKETTUVILA PLAMKANDATHIL HOUSE, EDAKKODE DESOM, PALLICHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM. ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SMT.K.R.RIJA ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031 ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.238/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -6Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 239 OF 2015 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` MURALEEDHARAN AGED 50 YEARS S/O.SUDHAKARAN, KALIYIKKAL VILAYIL HOUSE, HEEZTHONNAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SMT.BREJITHA UNNIKRISHNAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031 ``` ``` BY ADVS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.238/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -7Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN ``` ``` WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 7090 OF 2014 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL ``` ``` SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` MUHAMMED RAFI AGED 49 YEARS S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN(LATE),SAJEELA MANZIL, PEYAD PO, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV SRI.NIREESH MATHEW ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.238/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -8- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN ``` ``` WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRL.REV.PET NO. 2104 OF 2014 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA REVISION PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` VIJAYAN @ PARASSUVAKAL VIJAYAN AGED 53 YEARS ``` ``` S/O BALAKRISHNAN, MELPPARATHARISSU PUTHEN VEEDU, HOUSE NO XX/1439, PARASSUVAKKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TLAUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA ``` ``` REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.238/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -9- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRL.REV.PET NO. 2160 OF 2014 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 1130/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT.-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES,NEYYATTINKARA REVISION PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` BABU @ BABUJI S/O.SADASIVAN, KINATUVILA HOUSE, S.N.NAGAR, CHAKKA WARD, PETTAH VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN SRI.P.S.SISHOY ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031 (CRIME NO.116/2003 OF NEMAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT). ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` M.P PRASANTH PP ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.238/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` -10- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.** ====================================================== Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ============================================================= Dated this the 18[th] day of October, 2023 ## **ORDER** The petitioners in these cases are accused in Sessions Case No.1130 of 2007 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Neyyattinkara, arising from Crime No.116 of 2003 of Nemom Police Station. Originally four cases were registered as Crime No.116 of 2003 of Nemom Police Station, Crime No.8 of 2003 of Thampanoor Police Station, Crime No.168 of 2002 of Pettah Police Station and Crime No.198 of 2002 of Nemom Police Station. All these cases were clubbed together and Crime No.116 of 2003 of Nemom Police Station was investigated and a final report is filed and the same was taken on file as Sessions Case No.1130 of 2007. The offences alleged are under Sections 8(1) and (2), 55(a) and (i) and 58 of the Abkari Act and Section 120B IPC. 2. The short point raised in these cases by the learned Senior Counsel Sri.C.C.Thomas and the other counsel appearing in the other -11- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 cases is that the final report in these cases are filed by an incompetent officer. The final report is filed by a Circle Inspector of Police, (Control Room), Thiruvananthapuram. The contentions raised by the petitioners that he is an incompetent officer and this point is considered by this Court in **Sujith v. State of Kerala [2016 (3) KHC 823]** . Moreover in **Jil v. State of Kerala [2017 (3) KLT 156]** also this Court considered the same point. 3. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor. 4. After hearing both sides, I think there is force in the argument of the petitioners. The same point is considered by this Court in detail in **Sujith’s case** (supra). It will be beneficial to extract the relevant portion of the above judgment here: _“6. The investigation of a case of this nature can be conducted by an Abkari Officer notified under Section 4 of the Abkari Act. Such a Notification had been issued by the Government of Kerala which is SRO No. 321 of 1996 It reads as follows:_ -12- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 _“SRO No. 321/96.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Abkari Act, I of 1077 the Government of Kerala hereby appoint all Police Officers of and above the rank of Sub Inspector of Police in charge of Law and Order and working in the General executive branch of the Police Department and all Revenue Officers of and above the rank of Deputy Collectors to be Abkari Officers under their respective Jurisdiction for the purposes of Sections 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 and 59 of the Act and to exercise all the powers and to discharge all the duties conferred and imposed on Abkari Officers in the sections aforesaid._ _This notification shall come into force with immediate effect. (GO (P) No. 69/96/TD dt. 29/03/1996).”_ _7. As per this Notification, the Government of Kerala appointed all Police Officers of and above the rank of Sub Inspector of Police in charge of law and order and working in the general executive branch of the Police Department and all revenue officers of and above the rank of Deputy Collectors to be Abkari Officers under their respective jurisdiction for the purposes of Sections 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 and 59 of the Abkari Act and to exercise all the powers and to discharge all the duties conferred and imposed on Abkari Officers in the Sections aforesaid. Therefore, a Police Officer of and above the rank of Sub Inspector of Police in charge of law and order and working in the general_ -13- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 _executive branch of the Police Department appointed as an Abkari Officer alone can exercise the powers conferred and discharge the duties imposed under the aforesaid Sections of the Abkari Act. There cannot be any dispute and, as a matter of fact, there is no dispute with regard to the fact that the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narcotic Cell, Alappuzha, was not a Police Officer in charge of law and order and working in the general executive branch of the Police Department. He was an officer in the Narcotic Cell, Alappuzha, at the relevant time empowered with powers and duties connected therewith. It is quite evident from the Final Report filed after further investigation that the investigation was conducted by CW 62, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narcotic Cell, Alappuzha, and CW 61, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Kottayam, Just like CW 62, CW 61 was also not in charge of law and order and working in the general executive branch of the Police Department at the relevant time. He was working as the Deputy Superintendent of Police in the Crime Branch CID, Kottayam, at the relevant time. These two officers who conducted further investigation of the case were not in charge of law and order and working in the general executive branch of the Police Department. Therefore, they were not Abkari Officers empowered with powers and duties of investigation as specified in the Notification issued by the Government of Kerala under Section 4 of the Abkari Act namely, SRO No. 321 of 1996._ _8. The orders dated 10/11/2000 issued from the Police Headquarters and 01/12/2000 issued by the DIG (Crimes), cannot be with a Thiruvananthapuram, equated Notification issued under Section 4 of the Abkari Act by the_ -14Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 _Government of Kerala. An officer appointed as an Abkari Officer by way of a Notification issued under Section 4 of the Abkari Act by the Government of Kerala alone can be an Abkari Officer empowered with the powers of investigation. Such a power which can be exercised by the Government of Kerala under Section 4 of the Abkari Act cannot be exercised by the Police Headquarters or the Deputy Inspector General (Crimes) as happened in this case. Here is a case where two Deputy Superintendents of Police, one of CBCID, Kottayam, and another of Narcotic Cell, Alappuzha, both were not in charge of law and order and were not working in the general executive branch of the Police Department, had conducted the investigation and the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narcotic Cell, Alappuzha, had submitted the Final Report before the Court after such incompetent investigation. No Notification issued by the Government of Kerala under Section 4 of the Abkari Act appointing CWs 61 and 62 has been brought to the notice of this Court. There is no dispute also in regard to the fact that the Government alone is empowered under the Abkari Act to issue Notification under Section 4 of the Abkari Act appointing competent Abkari Officers for conducting investigation and submitting Final Report before the Court._ _9. Since the investigation was conducted by CWS 61 and 62, incompetent officers, and the Final Report was filed by CW 62, an incompetent officer, the Court below had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offences alleged in the complaint filed based on such investigation. The Court below framed a charge against three accused including the petitioner alleging the offences under Sections 8(1) and (2),_ -15- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 _55(a), (b). (h) and (i) and 57 of the Abkari Act and under Sections 1208 and 201 read with Section 34 of IPC. The charge thus framed includes not only abkari offences but also IPC offences. Therefore, a question may arise that even if the investigation conducted by CWS 61 and 62 was bad for want of powers in relation to abkari offences, the petitioner can be proceeded against for the IPC offences alleged against him. After considering the facts on record, it can be seen that the offences under Sections 120B and 201 read with Section 34 of IPC were incorporated in the charge along with the abkari offences as those offences had been allegedly committed in relation to the commission of abkari offences. So, the predominant offences are abkari offences. Moreover, the Abkari Act itself contains Section 55D providing for penalty for criminal conspiracy. In short, the IPC offences alleged cannot have any independent existence without the existence of the abkari offences alleged. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be proceeded against for the IPC offences as well. Since the Court below had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offences alleged against the petitioner as already stated, the Court below could not have framed a charge against him as it was without jurisdiction. In such a circumstance, a trial of the case cannot be followed against the petitioner. He is entitled to be discharged as provided under Section 227 of CrPC. Since the petitioner is entitled to be discharged, the charge framed by the Court below against him is without jurisdiction and hence liable to be quashed._ _10. In the result, the petitioner is discharged under Section 227 of CrPC and the charge framed by the Court below against him is quashed._ -16- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## _The Criminal Revision Petition is allowed.”_ 6. In the light of the above dictum laid down by this Court, and also in the light of the fact that the final report is already filed by an incompetent officer, I am of the considered opinion that the prosecution is unsustainable. Therefore, the impugned orders in these Crl.M.Cs are quashed and the proceedings before the court below also can be quashed. Therefore, these Crl.M.Cs and Crl.Rev.Petns are allowed in the following manner: The impugned orders in these cases are quashed. All the proceedings against the petitioners in these matters in Sessions Case No.1130 of 2007 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Neyyattinkara are quashed. sd/- ## **P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN** ## **JUDGE** das -17- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 202/2015`** ## `PETITIONER ANNEXURES` ``` ANNEXURE A: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCHARGE, CRL.MP.NO.627/2013 IN SC NO.1130/2007 FILED BEFORE THE ADD. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ANNEXURE B: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2014 IN CMP NO.627/2013 IN SC NO.1130/2007 PASSED BY THE ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ANNEXURE C: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLCIE, TRIVANDRUM CITY, NO.D1- 19207/03/TC DATED 11.4.2003. ``` ``` ANNEXURE D: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAURAM, NO.B2/8711/2003 TR DATED 16.10.2003. ``` ``` ANNEXURE E: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 20.7.2004. ``` ``` ANNEXURE F: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 22.2.2005. ``` ``` ANNEXURE G: PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2014 IN CRL.M.C 7097/2014. ``` -18- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 206/2015`** ## `PETITIONER ANNEXURES` ``` ANNEXURE A: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCHARGE, CRL.MP NO.622/2013 IN SC NO.1130/2007 FILED BEFORE THE ADD. DISTRICT & SESSIUONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ``` ``` ANNEXURE B: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2014 IN CMP NO.622/2013 IN SC NO.1130/2007 PASSED BY THE ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ANNEXURE C: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM CITY, NO.D1- 19207/03/TC DATED 11.4.2003. ANNEXURE D: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGSOF THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NO.B2/8711/2003/TR DATED 16.10.2003. ANNEXURE E: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 20.7.2004. ANNEXURE F: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE DIRECTOR GFENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 22.2.2005. ``` ``` ANNEXURE G: PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2014 IN CRL.MC 7097/2014. ``` -19Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 207/2015`** ## `PETITIONER ANNEXURES` ``` ANNEXURE A: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCHARGE, CRL.MP.NO.626/2013 IN S NO.1130/2007 FILED BEFORE THE ADD. DISTRICT & SESSINS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ``` ``` ANNEXURE B: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2014 IN CMP NO.626/2013 IN S NO.1130/2007 PASSED BY THE ADDL. SESSION COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ANNEXURE C: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM CITY, NO.D1- 19207/03/TC DATED 11.4.2003 ANNEXURE D: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NO.B2/8711/2003 TR DATED 16.10.2003. ANNEXURE E: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 20.7.2004. ANNEXURE F: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 22.2.2005. ``` ``` ANNEXURE G: PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2014 IN CRL MC 7097/2014. ``` -20- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 237/2015`** ## `PETITIONER ANNEXURES` ``` ANNEXURE-A.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCHARGE CRL.MP NO.628/2013 IN SC NO.1130/2007 FILED BEFORE THE ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ANNEXURE-B. CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17/11/2014 IN CMP NO.628/2013 IN SC 1130/2007 PASSED BY THE ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ANNEXURE-C.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM CITY NO.D1 19207/03/TC DATED 11/4/2003. ANNEXURE-D.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM NO.B2/8711/2003 TR DATED 16/10/2003. ``` ``` ANNEXURE-E.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 20/7/2004. ``` ``` ANNEXURE-F.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 22/2/2005. ``` ``` ANNEXURE-G.PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/12/2014 IN CRL.MO NO.7097/2014. ``` -21- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 239/2015`** ## `PETITIONER ANNEXURES` ``` ANNEXURE-A.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCHARGE CRL.MP NO.624/2013 IN SC NO.1130/2007 FILED BEFORE THE ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ``` ``` ANNEXURE-B. CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17/11/2014 IN CMP NO.623/2013 IN SC 1130/2007 PASSED BY THE ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ANNEXURE-C.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM CITY NO.D1 19207/03/TC DATED 11/4/2003. ANNEXURE-D.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM NO.B2/8711/2003 TR DATED 16/10/2003. ANNEXURE-E.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 20/7/2004. ``` ``` ANNEXURE-F.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 22/2/2005. ``` ``` ANNEXURE-G.PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/12/2014 IN CRL.MC NO.709/2014. ``` -22- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 7090/2014`** ## `PETITIONER ANNEXURES` ``` ANNEXURE-A COPY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCHARGE CRLMP NO.621/2013 IN SWC NO.1130/2007 FILED BEFORE THE ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA ``` ``` ANNEXURE-B COPY OFR THE ORDER DATED 17/11/2014 IN CMP NO.621/2013 IN SC NO. 1130/2007 PASSED BY THE ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA ``` ``` ANNEXURE-C COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ,TRIVANDRUM CITY,NO.D1 19207/03/TC DATED 11/4/2003 ANNEXURE-D COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,NO.B2/8711/2003 TR DATED 16/10/2003 ``` ``` ANNEXURE-E COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,KERALA,NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 20/7/2004 ANNEXURE-F COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA,NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 22/2/2005 ANNEXURE-G COPY OF THE DICISION , SAJI @ KOCHUMON VS.STATE OF KERALA REPORTED IN 2010(3) KLT 471 ANNEXURE-H COPY OF THE DECISION ,A.N.RAJAN VS.STATE OF KERALA REPORTED IN 2014(3) KLJ 720 ANNEXURE-I COPY OF THE DECISION ,HASHIM VS.ASST.SUB INSPECTOR REPORTED IN 2014(2) KLT 346 ANNEXURE-J COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.128/70(NO.C1- 39091/70 DATED 3/10/70) ``` -23- Crl.Rev.Petn.Nos. 2104, 2160 of 2014, Crl.M.C Nos. 7090 of 2014, 202, 206, 207, 237, 238 and 239 of 2015 ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 238/2015`** ## `PETITIONER ANNEXURES` ``` ANNEXURE-A.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCHARGE CRL.MP NO.624/2013 IN SC NO.1130/2007 FILED BEFORE THE ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ``` ``` ANNEXURE-B. CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17/11/2014 IN CMP NO.624/2013 IN SC 1130/2007 PASSED BY THE ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, NEYYATTINKARA. ANNEXURE-C.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM CITY NO.D1 19207/03/TC DATED 11/4/2003. ANNEXURE-D.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM NO.B2/8711/2003 TR DATED 16/10/2003. ANNEXURE-E.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 20/7/2004. ANNEXURE-F.PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, NO.D1/65132/04 DATED 22/2/2005. ``` ``` ANNEXURE-G.PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/12/2014 IN CRL.MC NO.709/2014. ```