Common Cause & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court
- Hon'ble Judges
- Madan B. Lokur
- Kurian Joseph
- A. K. Sikri
- Judgment Date
- 2017-01-23
- Court Decision / Holding
- Direct an SIT appointed by this Hon'ble Court to investigate the abuse of authority committed by the CBI Director in order to scuttle enquiries, investigations and prosecutions being carried out by the CBI in coal block allocation cases and other important cases. The Special Investigating Team, led by the Director, CBI, may take assistance of two officers of the CBI nominated by the Director with due intimation to this Court. The Director, CBI will also take the Chief Vigilance Commissioner into confidence in respect of the investigations. Since the Director, CBI will undoubtedly require the assistance of someone well versed in the law, Mr. R.S. Cheema, who is already a Special Public Prosecutor in the coal block allocation cases, is to assist the Director, CBI and his team on legal issues. A copy of this order may be provided to the Director, CBI who will indicate on the next date of hearing the composition of his team and the time required to complete the investigations. The matter is of considerable public importance and should be taken up with due earnestness by the Director, CBI.
- Final Disposition
- Directions issued.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Common Cause & Ors.
Respondents
- Union of India & Ors.
Case Synopsis & Summary
Common Cause & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. concerns allegations that the then Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Ranjit Sinha, met with persons accused in coal block allocation cases, potentially influencing investigations, charge-sheets or closure reports. In an order dated 14 May 2015, the Supreme Court held that it was completely inappropriate for the CBI Director to meet with accused persons in the absence of the investigating team and directed an inquiry into whether such meetings affected investigations. A Committee headed by M.L. Sharma submitted its report in March 2016. The Court considered whether an external Special Investigating Team (SIT) should be appointed. Given a change of guard in the CBI, the Court decided to repose faith in the impartiality of the CBI to examine Sharma’s report and related materials and to conduct an investigation as an SIT within the CBI. The SIT would be led by the present CBI Director, with two officers nominated by the Director, and the Chief Vigilance Commissioner would be kept informed; Mr. R.S. Cheema, serving as Special Public Prosecutor in coal block cases, would assist on legal issues. The Court clarified that it has not expressed a view on merits of the allegations or Sharma’s report, but held that a prima facie case for investigation exists. The matter, of public importance, requires earnest handling by the Director, CBI and the Court. It directs the Director to report the SIT’s composition and the time required for completion and to provide a copy of the order to the CBI Director. The judgment underscores ongoing accountability in high-level investigations.
Provisions of Law Cited
Legal Doctrines & Maxims
- Prima facie
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Common Cause & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.