Cochin Institute of Science and Technology v. Jisin Jijo and Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Hrishikesh Roy
- A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar
- Judgment Date
- 2019-07-09
- Court Decision / Holding
- The appeal is dismissed; the High Court’s earlier view that the college cannot compel unwilling students to continue remains undisturbed; the transfer rights under Ext.P1 norms are recognized, and the earlier judgment in WA1362/2019, affirmed by the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the related SLP, stands.
- Final Disposition
- Appeal dismissed; WA 1549/2019 disposed in favor of maintaining the earlier order and transfer rights as per Ext.P1 norms.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- THE COCHIN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ETTAPPALLY, MANNATHOOR P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM-686723 represented by its Chairman, Mr. T.K. SHAMSUDHEEN
- DR.S.R.DEEPA, Principal, THE COCHIN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ETTAPPALLY, MANNATHOOR P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM-686723
Respondents
- AISHWARYA P.S
- URMILA GOPAN
- ALITT THOMAS
- SANJAI S
- AKSHAY T. SOJAN
- ASWIN P. ANIL
- ASWIN JAMES
- ASHNA AISWARYA L.K.
- ASWIN.M.
- MILAN JACOB
- AMAL MOHAN
- ASHIL BAIJU
- JOSNAMOL
- AKKILAS K.J.
- NISHA SIMON
- ABHIJITH P.S.
- ANSIL.H
- VIGNESH.S
- SHAPNA V.M.
- MUHAMMED FARHAN.S.
- ABRAHAM SHARON
- SHALIMA JOY
- REJO THOMAS KADUKKARA
- P.V.ALEX
- AARYAN RAJ
- ABHIMANNYU SAJEEVAN
- MUHAMMED MUHSIN
- AJIN SAM SAJI
- SHAFFIR ALIKHAN
- ABHISHEK M.R.
- SAJIDH K.S.
- MUSHTHAQ MOHAMMED
- MUHAMMED AZHAR P.H.
- LEOBA YEDHUKULAN
- YACOB JUDE
- MOHAMMED SANJIND SIRAJ
- THANSEEM RASHEED
- BLESSON BABU
- JAISON THOMAS
- DONJOSEPH
- AJAY KRISHNA
- YEDHUKRISHNA M.GOPI
- ANANDA KRISHNAN.S.
- SOORAJ SANIL
- MEREENA MARIAM JIBU
- VISHAL P.R.
- ANITH ANIL
- SARATH ANILKUMAR
- ASWATHY REGHU
- LUDIYA B.G.
- REETHIKA B.V.
- YADHU KRISHNAN
- ANN MARY K.A.
- MARSHEL THOMAS
- BISMA ALI
- JURIN THADDEOUS
- ANZAR RAHIM
- KARTHIK RATHEESH
- NISHIN K.K.
- THOMAS KURIAKOSE
- JAYASREE P.
- THE A.P.J ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF KERALA
- THE REGISTRAR, THE A.P.J ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
- THE MANAGER, ADMISSION SUPERVISORY/FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE FOR PROFESSSIONAL COLLEGES
- THE STATE OF KERALA
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Sri. Anoop V. Nair
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri. D. Kishore
- • Smt. Mary Benjamin (SC, Admission Supervisory Committee for Professional Colleges)
- • Smt. Meera Gopinath
- • Smt. Mini Gopinath
- • Sri. R. Muraleekrishnan (Government Pleader)
- • Sri. V. Tek Chand
- • Sri. Elvin Peter P. J.
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ appeal (WA No.1549/2019) arises from a challenge to a High Court order in WP(C) 15212/2019 dated 17.06.2019. The Cochin Institute of Science and Technology (the appellant) contends that transfer of students from the self-financing college to other Self Financing Institutes should be permissible under Ext.P1 norms issued by the University, and seeks to overturn the High Court’s view that the college cannot compel unwilling students to continue their studies. The students-respondents had sought inter-college transfers on grounds of faculty and infrastructure shortages at the college. The court recalled earlier proceedings (WP(C) Nos.14156/2019 and 14547/2019) which held that transfer should be possible and that compelling students to stay was impermissible; this view was upheld by the Division Bench in WA No.1362 of 2019 (Cochin Institute v. Jisin Jijo and Others) and was not disturbed by the Supreme Court in SLP Nos.13854-3855/2019. The appellants argued for a different view, including reliance on unpaid dues remitted by students as noted in the impugned judgment. The High Court, following the earlier rulings and the Supreme Court’s non-interference, dismissed the appeal, keeping the prior order intact and directing that transfer rights under Ext.P1 be recognized.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The appellant college submitted that Ext.P1 norms issued by the University authorise inter-college transfer between self-financing colleges, and that such transfers are necessary in the interest of students given shortages of faculty and infrastructure at the appellant’s college. It contended that the High Court erred in compelling unwilling students to remain, and relied on prior orders in WP(C) Nos.14156/2019 and 14547/2019, as well as WA1362/2019, to argue that the transfer right should be recognized and not restricted. The counsel emphasized that the impugned judgment itself noted that unpaid dues would be remitted by students, and that the Supreme Court’s dismissal of SLP Nos.13854-3855/2019 confirms the continuing relevance of the earlier rulings. They urged dismissal of the appeal to preserve the established policy and the welfare of students seeking transfer, along with maintaining university norms and financial consistency for the college.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents argued that inter-college transfer is permissible under Ext.P1 norms and that the college cannot compel students to continue in a college that lacks adequate infrastructure or faculty. They relied on the earlier judgments in WP(C) Nos.14156/2019 and 14547/2019 and the Division Bench decision in WA1362/2019 which held that students should not be forced to remain in the college. They highlighted that the High Court’s directions reflect the policy of permitting transfers, and any unpaid dues would be remitted as per the judgment’s paragraph 8. They contended that the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the SLP supports not disturbing the earlier decisions and that the appeal should be dismissed to uphold the students’ transfer rights and the earlier rulings.
Cited Precedents (3)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Cochin Institute of Science and Technology v. Jisin Jijo and Others | WA 1362 of 2019 | Positive | Earlier Division Bench decision binding on the issue; not disturbed by Supreme Court; relied upon to support the transfer rights and non-compulsion |
| WP(C) Nos.14156 of 2019 and 14547 of 2019 | W.P.(C) Nos.14156/2019 and 14547/2019 | Mentioned Only | Cited as earlier proceedings recognizing the principle but not treated as binding over the present WA |
| Special Leave Petition Nos.13854-3855/2019 | SLP Nos. 13854-3855/2019 | Mentioned Only | Supreme Court dismissal noted; does not reverse but supports the earlier rulings |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Cochin Institute of Science and Technology v. Jisin Jijo and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.