High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; writ petition disposed of with dir...

Chinnammu, Velayudhan and Sreedevi v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal Pattambi

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B)
Neutral Citation::null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-31
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of. Land Tribunal Pattambi to dispose of S.M Nos. 230/2021, 843/2019 and 1030/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment, and incorporating GO (P).No.09/2018/RD. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; writ petition disposed of with directions to dispose of the three S.M. nos strictly in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Chinnammu
  • Velayudhan
  • Sreedevi

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar, Land Tribunal Pattambi, Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Palakkad - 679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • P.R. Venkatesh
  • • G. Keerthivas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty (Sr Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

Chinnammu, aged 77, along with two other petitioners, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus to direct the Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of suo motu proceedings in three Land Tribunal matters: S.M. No. 230/2021 in the name of the 1st petitioner, S.M. No. 843/2019 in the name of the 2nd petitioner, and S.M. No. 1030/2020 in the name of the 3rd petitioner. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petition cites the need for timely resolution, especially since the petitioners are senior citizens seeking loans or financial assistance that require purchase certificates. The case references Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, which emphasized disposal of cases on seniority and allowed village officers’ reports to expedite. The court emphasizes expeditious disposal following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, notes substantial pendency (about 11,078 cases), and ultimately disposes of the petition with directions to proceed strictly in accordance with law, incorporating GO (P). No. 09/2018/RD. No costs awarded.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963GO (P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that expeditious enquiry and disposal of the suo motu cases is essential due to the advanced ages of the petitioners (77 and 72) and the practical need to secure purchase certificates for loan purposes. They rely on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision, urging the Land Tribunal to adhere to seniority-based disposal and to utilize Village Officers' reports to expedite processes, while not allowing out-of-turn disposal that would derail the queue. They request prioritization for senior citizens (within six months) and strict compliance with the directions in the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment, including use of Village Officers’ reports and timely issuance of certificates of purchase under Sections 72/72K.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents emphasize that Land Tribunal Pattambi faces a large pendency (over 11,000 cases). They contend disposal must be in strict accordance with law and in order of seniority, avoiding out-of-turn advancements. They point to GO (P).No.09/2018/RD (22.02.2018) enabling Village Officers to assist Tribunals and to expeditious disposal for senior citizens, while noting that delay often stems from serving notices to landlords. They advocate adherence to the timeframes established by this Court and higher authorities, and request that notices be issued in an orderly fashion, with reports obtained through Village Officers or by other lawful means to prevent unnecessary delays.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as the authoritative decision directing expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases and emphasizing seniority-based disposal; the present Court follows its directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Chinnammu, Velayudhan and Sreedevi v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal Pattambi and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1943** **WP(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **1 CHINNAMMU, AGED 77 YEARS W/O.LATE AYYAVU, VARYAKUNNU, MANJAPRA, VADAKKENCHERY, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2 VELAYUDHAN, AGED 72 YEARS S/O.CHAMI, CHIRAKKOD HOUSE, ATHIPOTTA P.O., PALAKKAD. 3 SREEDEVI, AGED 56 YEARS POTTIMADA, VANUR, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.R.VENKATESH SRI.G.KEERTHIVAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND TRIBUNAL, PATTAMBI, MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD - 679 104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.230/2021 in the name of the 1[st] petitioner, S.M.No.843/2019 in the name of the 2[nd] petitioner and S.M.No.1030/2020 in the name of the 3[rd] petitioner on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0344 Hectares of land of the 1[st] petitioner comprised in Re.Sy.No.87/2 in Block No.44 of Vadakkenchery-I Village in Palakkad District; 0.0324 Hectares of land of the 2[nd] petitioner comprised in Re.Sy.No.366/11 in Block No.6 of Tarur-II W.P(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B) -3- Village in Palakkad District; and 0.0111 Hectares of land of the 3[rd] petitioner comprised in Re.Sy.No.93/24 in Block No.27 of Alathur Village in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to W.P(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B) -4- dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, W.P(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B) -5- this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice ## W.P(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B) -6- to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Vadakkenchery-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.230/2021, in respect of the 1[st] petitioner, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 20.02.2021; based on the report of the Village Officer, Tarur-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.843/2019, in respect of the 2[nd] petitioner, as evidenced by Ext.P2 receipt dated 29.04.2019; and based on W.P(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B) -7- the report of the Village Officer, Alathur Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1030/2020, in respect of the 3[rd] petitioner, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt dated 11.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioners would point out that the petitioners 1 and 2 are senior citizens aged 77 years and 72 years respectively. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.Nos.230/2021, 843/2019 and 1030/2020, following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , W.P(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B) -8- referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.Nos.230/2021, 843/2019 and 1030/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6015 OF 2021(B) -9- ## **APPENDIX** ||**APPENDIX**| |---|---| |**PETITIONER'S/S**|**EXHIBITS:**| |**EXHIBIT P1**|**TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SM**| ||**NO.230/2021 IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER.**| |**EXHIBIT P2**|**TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SM**| ||**NO.843/2019 IN THE NAME OF 2ND**| ||**PETITIONER.**| |**EXHIBIT P3**|**TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SM**| ||**NO.1030/2020 IN THE NAME OF 3RD**| ||**PETITIONER.**| |**EXHIBIT P4**|**TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C)**| ||**NO.854/2018 DATED 14/3/2018 OF THIS**| ||**HON'BLE COURT.**|