High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of

BIJU THOMAS v. THE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOTTAYAM; VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH; THE SECRETARY, VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH

Case / Petition Number:W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • N. Nagareesh
Judgment Date
2022-10-13
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider and pass orders on the Building Permit and Development Permit without insisting on an NOC from the Geologist, after the petitioner files an affidavit that he will not transport the rocks excavated.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • BIJU THOMAS

Respondents

  • THE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOTTAYAM
  • THE VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, represented by its Secretary
  • THE SECRETARY, VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • BABU S. NAIR
  • • SMITHA BABU

Counsels for Respondents

  • • ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
  • • SRI.LIJI J. VADAKKEDAM, STANDING COUNSEL
  • • GOVERNMENT PLEADER(GP-1)
  • • SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Biju Thomas, seeks a building permit for 10.25 cents of land in Vellavoor Village, Kottayam District. The 3rd respondent, the Panchayat Secretary, rejected the grant, stating that the Building Permit could be considered only after obtaining a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Mining and Geology Department for rock removal. The petitioner then approached the 1st respondent Geologist, who through Ext.P5 informed that the District Collector had exempted the Geologist from issuing NOC for development-related activities and that permission should come from the Panchayat. The parties clash: the Panchayat requires an NOC from the Geologist, while the Geologist claims exemption from issuing such NOC for excavation of minerals for construction. The bench cites Ramachandran T.K. and another v. Vellavoor Grama Panchayath and others (2021) 5 KLT 1 to clarify that (i) development permission is necessary only where development of land is involved; (ii) quarrying permit is not required for ordinary earth extraction for construction with a valid building permit and no environmental clearance; and (iii) transit passes have distinct requirements. R.5(4) of the Panchayat Building Rules does not require NOC from the Geologist for issuing a development permit. The court directs the Panchayat to consider and grant building and development permits without insisting on the Geologist’s NOC, provided the petitioner files an affidavit that he will not transport the excavated rocks.

Provisions of Law Cited

R.5(4) of the Panchayat Building Rules

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Development permit from local authority is necessary only when land development is involved.
  • Quarrying permit is not required for extraction of ordinary earth in connection with construction of building which does not require environmental clearance, provided a valid building permit is obtained.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Petitioner contends that the Panchayat should process the Building Permit without requiring a NOC from the Geologist, since the District Collector exempted the Geologist from issuing NOC for development; the rocks to be excavated are for building purposes only and not for transport, so a Mineral Transit Pass is not pressed.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents contend that NOC from the Geologist is either required or at least a matter of contention; the 3rd respondent refused the permit citing need for NOC; the Geologist claims exemption; the conflicting positions necessitated judicial clarification.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Ramachandran T.K. and another v. Vellavoor Grama Panchayath and others2021 (5) KLT 1PositiveThe court relies on the Ramachandran T.K. ruling to construe when a local development permit is required and to interpret NOC requirements and exemptions in the context of quarrying/excavation for building purposes.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against BIJU THOMAS v. THE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOTTAYAM; VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH; THE SECRETARY, VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH ``` ``` THURSDAY, THE 13[TH] DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 21ST ASWINA,1944 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 18189 OF 2022 ``` ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` BIJU THOMAS AGED 48 YEARS S/O.THOMAS, CHAMAKALAYIL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 543 ``` ``` BY ADVS. BABU S. NAIR SMITHA BABU ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 THE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOTTAYAM KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 001`** - **`2 THE VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MANIMALA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 543.`** - **`3 THE SECRETARY, VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MANIMALA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 543.`** ``` BY ADVS. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA SRI.LIJI J. VADAKKEDAM, STANDING COUNSEL, VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT GOVERNMENT PLEADER(GP-1) ``` ## **`SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER`** W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022 : 2 : ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022 : 3 : ## **JUDGMENT** Dated this the 13[th] day of October, 2022 The petitioner is in possession of 10.25 Cents of property in Survey Nos.330/16-4, 5 and 330/22-2 of Vellavoor Village in Kottayam District. He wanted to construct a building in the property. He made an application for Building Permit before the 3[rd ] respondent-Secretary. The 3[rd ] respondent-Secretary rejected the Building Permit application stating that only after getting permission from the Mining and Geology Department for removal of rock in the properties, the application can be considered. 2. The petitioner approached the 1[st] respondentGeologist. The 1[st] respondent as per Ext.P5 Communication informed the petitioner that the District Collector has exempted the 1[st] respondent from issuing No Objection Certificate for development of land and that permission has to be given by the Panchayat. W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022 : 4 : 3. Now, the situation is that the petitioner is not able to get a Building Permit and Development Permit because the Panchayat insists for obtaining a No Objection Certificate from the Geologist, whereas the Geologist states that he is exempted from giving No Objection Certificate for excavation of minerals for the purpose of construction of buildings and land developments. 4. This Court in the judgment in _**Ramachandran T.K. and another v. Vellavoor Grama Panchayath and others** [2021 (5) KLT 1]_ has held as follows: (i) A development permit from the local authority is necessary only when 'development of land' in terms of the building rules is involved. (ii) Quarrying permit is not required for extraction of ordinary earth in connection with construction of building which does not require environmental clearance, provided, a valid building permit is obtained. (iii) For obtaining transit passes for transportation of ordinary earth, (a) In cases where 'land development', as defined under the concerned building rules is involved, a land development permit from the local authority shall be made available. W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022 : 5 : (b) In cases where no 'land development', in terms of the building rules is involved, an approved building plan containing the area of land for construction of the building and the quantity of ordinary earth to be extracted for construction, shall be obtained from the local authority. (iv) R.5(4) of the Panchayat Building Rules does not require NOC/ Permission from the Department of Mining and Geology for issuance of development permit by the local authority 5. In view of the afore judgment, it is clear that a quarrying permit is not required for extraction of ordinary earth in connection with construction of building which does not require Environmental Clearance, provided a valid Building Permit is obtained. Though the judgment speaks only about ordinary earth, the petitioner would submit that the petitioner want to excavate rocks only for the purpose of construction of building and the petitioner does not intend to transport the rocks for which alone Mineral Transit Pass is required. The petitioner would further submit that though a prayer has been made in the writ petition seeking Mineral Transit Passes, the petitioner is not pressing for that relief as the rocks so excavated will be used W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022 : 6 : for the purpose of building construction alone in the very same land. 6. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the Panchayat Authorities shall consider the application for Building Permit without insisting for No Objection Certificate from the 1[st] respondent-Geologist, provided the petitioner files an affidavit to the effect that the petitioner will not be transporting the rocks so excavated from the land. The writ petition is therefore disposed of directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider and pass orders on the application for Building Permit and Development Permit submitted by the petitioner without insisting for No Objection Certificate from the District Geologist, after obtaining an affidavit from the petitioner on the above lines. **N.NAGARESH JUDGE** sss W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022 : 7 : ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18189/2022`** ## **`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS`** ``` Exhibit P1 ``` ``` Exhibit P2 ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTIES OWNED BY THE PETITIONER DATED, 7-4-2022. ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DATED, 30-4-2021. ``` ``` Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED, 30-3-2021. Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED, 27-4-2021. ``` ``` Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED, 16-7-2021. ``` ``` Exhibit P6TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR TO THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS, KOTTAYAM DATED, 14-1-2022. ``` ``` Exhibit P7 ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ADDRESS BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHYATHS, KOTTAYAM TO THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHYATHS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED, 18-3-2022. ``` W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022 : 8 : W.P.(C) No.18189 of 2022 : 9 :