High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petitions disposed with directions. The Go...
BeeBa K. Nath H.S.A. (English) v. State of Kerala and others, and connected matters concerning HSA (English) post at CMM Higher Secondary School, Thalakkulathur, Kozhikode
Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017; connected WP(C) Nos. 12788/2018, 28132/2017, 28756/2017
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- A. Muhamed Mustaque
- Judgment Date
- 2018-12-06
- Court Decision / Holding
- Writ petitions disposed of with directions. The Government order recognizing Smitha’s seniority was allowed to stand to the extent of seniority, while remitting the two issues for reconsideration: (i) rival claim between Beeba Nath and Rupesh, and (ii) the benefits due to Smitha from 01.06.2010 (including salary). The department is to decide within three months, after giving notice to Beeba Nath, Smitha, Rupesh, and the Manager. Smitha shall receive salary in accordance with the Government Order; Beeba Nath and Rupesh’s salary disbursement is to follow the applicable legal framework.
- Final Disposition
- Writ petitions disposed with directions. The Government order recognizing Smitha’s seniority remains in place; however, two issues—Beeba Nath vs Rupesh and Smitha’s benefits from 01.06.2010 (including salary)—are remitted to the Government for consideration within three months, with notices to all interested parties. Smitha to be paid salary per the Government Order; Beeba Nath and Rupesh to be dealt with as per law.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- BeeBa K. Nath H.S.A. (English), CMM Higher Secondary School, Thalakkulathur, Kozhikode District
- Smt. P. Smitha (H.S.A. English)
- The Manager, CMM Higher Secondary School, Thalakkulathur
Respondents
- The State of Kerala represented by the Secretary, General Education Department, Thiruvananthapuram
- The Director of Public Instruction, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram
- The Deputy Director of Education, Kozhikode
- The District Educational Officer, Kozhikode
- The Manager, CMM Higher Secondary School, Thalakkulathur
- P. Samitha Anaswara, Naduvannur P.O., Kozhikode
- The Headmaster, CMM Higher Secondary School, Thalakkkathur
- Rupesh H.S.A.
- Smt. Smitha Anaswara? (as appears in connected petitions)
- Smt. Beeba K. Nath
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Dr. George Abraham
- • K. Mohanakannan
- • A.R. Pravitha
- • S.P. Aravindakshan Pillay
- • L. Annapoorna
- • Smt. N. Santha
- • Smt. Peter Jose Christo
- • Sri V. Varghese
- • Sri S.A. Anand
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri K.B. Ganesha (Government Pleader)
- • B. UnnikrishnakAimal (Government Pleader)
- • Sri K. Mohanakannan
- • Anand S.A.
- • Smt. L. Annapoorna
- • Smt. N. Santha
- • Sri Peter Jose Christo
- • Sri V. Varghese
Case Synopsis & Summary
These connected writ petitions concern appointment and seniority to the post of Head of Subject (HSA) English at CMM Higher Secondary School, Thalakkulathur, Kozhikode. Beeba K. Nath and Smt. Smitha contested government actions affecting seniority and vacancy allocations in 2010-2011, including Rupesh H.S.A.’s accommodation in an HSA English vacancy. Smitha had been approved for appointment with effect from 17.11.2011, while Beeba Nath claimed an earlier date and challenged Rupesh’s placement in the vacancy, arguing a violation of Rule 6(I) of Chapter XXIII of the Kerala Education Rules (KER). The Government Order ultimately favored Smitha’s seniority, prompting Beeba Nath and Rupesh to seek relief. The court acknowledged the rival claims and referred to a prior Division Bench decision directing hearing of all relevant parties before passing orders. It noted that Smitha’s senior claim has weight and that the government order should be examined on two concrete fronts: (i) the Beeba-Rupesh rivalry, and (ii) the benefits due to Smitha from 01.06.2010 (including salary). The judge remitted consideration to the Government and Manager, with a three-month deadline, and directed that salaries be paid per law where applicable. The petitions are disposed with these directions, preserving Smitha’s seniority while leaving Beeba Nath and Rupesh to be settled under due process.
Provisions of Law Cited
Rule 6(I) of Chapter XXIII of Kerala Education Rules (KER)
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners argued that Rupesh was placed in the HSA English vacancy in 2010-11 in violation of Rule 6(I) of Chapter XXIII of the Kerala Education Rules, and that Beeba Nath and Smitha have legitimate seniority or senior placement rights. Beeba Nath urged accommodation against Rupesh’s vacancy and claimed earlier appointment date; Smitha asserted seniority from 01.06.2010 and sought corresponding salary and approvals. The managers and school authorities contended keeping with government orders and the established vacancy norms.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents contended that the government order appropriately recognized Smitha’s seniority, that Rupesh’s placement was in accordance with the GO creating English as a core subject (G.O.(MS) No.11/2002), and that salary and benefits should be determined under due process with proper notice and within legal framework.
Cited Precedents (4)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deepa Augustine v. Geetha Alex | 2008 (2) KLT 771 | Mentioned Only | Referenced by Beeba Nath in arguments but not central to the disposal. |
| State of Kerala and others v. Minimole C and Another | 2012 (2) KHC 750 | Mentioned Only | Cited in the context of occupancy/seniority arguments; not applied as a binding ruling in this disposal. |
| Minimole C. v. State of Kerala | 2012 (4) KLT 442 | Mentioned Only | Cited as part of the authorities; no direct overruling or extension in this judgment. |
| Common Judgment in WAS Nos.1781, 1977 and 2417 of 2015 | 2016 | Positive | Relied upon to acknowledge the superior claim of Smitha and guide disposal; the court refers to it to uphold Smitha’s seniority. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against BeeBa K. Nath H.S.A. (English) v. State of Kerala and others, and connected matters concerning HSA (English) post at CMM Higher Secondary School, Thalakkulathur, Kozhikode and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.
## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM**
## **PRESENT**
**THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE**
**THURSDAY ,THE 06TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940**
## **WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017**
## **PETITIONER/S:**
**BEEBA K.NATH H.S.A (ENGLISH), CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,THALAKKULATHUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.**
- **BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM**
- **:**
- **1 THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.685001.**
- **2 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHI,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695014.**
- **3 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.673001.**
- **4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.673001.**
- **5 THE MANAGER CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALAKKULATHUR,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.673317.**
- **6 P. SMITHA ANASWARA, NADUVANNUR PO, KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.673614.**
- **7 K.G RUPESH H.S.A, CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,THALAKKULATHUR, KOZHIKODE.**
## **RESPONDENT/S:**
**BY ADVS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.B.GANGESH**
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases
2
## **SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN**
**SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.V.VARGHESE**
**BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER**
## **B.UNNIKRISHNAKAIMAL GP**
**THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06.12.2018, ALONG WITH WP(C).12788/2018, WP(C).28132/2017, WP(C).28756/2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:**
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 3
# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM**
# **PRESENT**
**THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE**
# **THURSDAY ,THE 06TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940**
# **WP(C).No. 12788 of 2018**
## **PETITIONER/S:**
**BEEBA K NATH H.S.A. (ENGLISH), CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,THALAKKULATHUR, HOZHIKODE DISTRICT**
**BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM**
## **RESPONDENT/S:**
- **1 THE STATE OF KERALA**
- **REP. BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-685 001.**
**2 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 3 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 001. 4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 001. 5 THE MANAGER CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,THALAKKULATHUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 317. 6 P. SMITHA ANASWARA, NADUVANNUR P.O.,KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 614. BY ADVS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.B.UNIIKRISHNA KAIMAL S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN ANAND S.A. SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SRI.V.VARGHESE**
**THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06.12.2018, ALONG WITH WP(C).28756/2017, WP(C).28132/2017, WP(C).25388/2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:**
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 4
# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM**
## **PRESENT**
**THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE**
**THURSDAY ,THE 06TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940**
## **WP(C).No. 28132 of 2017**
## **PETITIONER/S:**
**THE MANAGER, CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALAKULATHOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.**
**BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA**
## **RESPONDENT/S:**
- **1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.**
- **2 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.**
- **3 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673001.**
- **4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673001.**
|**5**|**P.SAMITHA**|
|---|---|
||**ANASWARA, NADUVANNUR P.O., KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE**|
||**DISTRICT-683317.**|
|**6**|**BEEBA K.NATH**|
||**H.S.A.(ENGLISH), CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,**|
||**THALAKKULATHUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673317.**|
||**BY ADVS.**|
||**GOVERNMENT PLEADER**|
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases
5
**SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY ANAND S.A. SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.VARGHESE**
**THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06.12.2018, ALONG WITH WP(C).28756/2017, WP(C).12788/2018, WP(C).25388/2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:**
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 6
## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM**
## **PRESENT**
**THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE**
**THURSDAY ,THE 06TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940**
## **WP(C).No. 28756 of 2017**
## **PETITIONER/S:**
**P. SMITHA AGED 35 YEARS W/O. ANEESH, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (ENGLISH), CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALAKKULATHUR, KOZHIKODE673371 (RESIDING AT ANASWARA, P.O.NADUVANNUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT0673317)**
**BY ADVS. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA PETER JOSE SRI.S.A.ANAND SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.V.VARGHESE**
## **RESPONDENT/S:**
**1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATIONAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEXE-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695001.**
- **2 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014**
- **3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE-673020**
- **4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE-673001**
- **5 THE MANAGER, CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALAKKULATHUR, KOZHIKODE-673317**
- **6 THE HEADMASTER, CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALAKKULATHUR,**
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 7
## **KOZHIKODE-673317**
- **7 SMT.BEEBA K.NATH,**
**CMM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALAKKULATHUR, KOZHIKODE-673317**
**BY ADVS.**
## **GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN**
**THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06.12.2018, ALONG WITH WP(C).12788/2018, WP(C).28132/2017, WP(C).25388/2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:**
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 8
## **JUDGMENT**
## **[ WP(C) 25388/2017 ,WP(C).12788/2018 ,WP(C).28132/2017 ,WP(C).28756/2017 ]**
These matters are related to the claim to the post of HSA English in CMM Higher Secondary School, Thalakkulathur, Kozhikode. Smt. P. Smitha the writ petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 28756/2017 was appointed as HSA (English) with effect from 01.06.2010. Smt.Beeba.K. Nath the writ petitioner in W.P.(C) No.25388 of 2017 and 12788 of 2018, was appointed in a vacancy on 31.08.2010. That appointment was approved with effect from 17.11.2011. Smitha's appointment was not approved that time for the reason that she was appointed in a promotion vacancy of Sheelamma. K.Geroge. The Manager withdrew her appointment with effect from 01.06.2011. There were series of challenges and many intervening facts involved. I am not adverting to those aspects. As stands now Smitha's appointment has been approved.
2. I am only referring to the Judgment in Writ Appeal Nos.1781, 1977 and 2417 of 2015 for the purpose of disposal of this case. The rivalry between Smitha and Beeba K.Nath culminated in the writ appeal
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 9
judgment. The writ appeal was filed by Beeba.K.Nath, Smitha and the Manager. In the writ appeal it was argued that Sri. Rupesh HSA(Maths) who was found surplus during higher level verification conducted in an academic year 2010-2011 was accommodated against the post of HSA(English). The rival claim of Smitha and Beeba.K.Nath could have an impact in respect of post in which Rupesh was accommodated. Admittedly, there were two posts of HSA English. Therefore, the Division Bench directed the government to consider the matter after hearing Smitha, Beeba.K.Nath , Rupesh and the Manager.
3. The Government noting that Smt. Smitha is having a superior claim, ordered an approval with effect from 17.11.2011. Smitha has filed a Writ Petition No. 28756/2017 to implement that Government Order. Smitha has a claim that it should be approved with effect from 01.06.2010. The date on which Beeba.K.Nath was actually appointed.
4. Beeba.K.Nath is a junior. I do not find any reason to interfere with the Government Order to the extent of upholding the claim of Smitha as a senior. However Beeba.K.Nath had a case that she should have been accommodated against Rupesh. According to
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 10
Beeba.K.Nath that Rupesh was accommodated in a vacancy of HSA(English) in violation of **Rule 6 (I) of Chapter XXIII of KER.** Beeba.K.Nath also place the reliance in the judgments of this Court in **Deepa Augustine v. Geetha Alex [2008 (2) KLT 771], State of kerala and others v. Minimole C and Another [2012 (2) KHC 750]** and **Minimole C. v. State of Kerala [2012 (4) KLT 442].**
5 **.** Rupesh entered appearance and would contend that, he was appointed in a vacancy in accordance with the Government Order creating English as a core subject as G.O.(MS)No.11/02/G.Edn. Dated
07.01.2002. It is submitted that no one had challenged accommodating him in the post of HSA English.
6. There are two important facts that remain unanswered in the Government Order, one is the rival claim between Beeba.K.Nath and Rupesh. In the Writ Appeal judgment itself this Court directed the Government to hear Rupesh before passing orders. The legality of accommodating Rupesh in the vacancy of HSA English need to be answered by the Government. That was not done. Whether Rupesh could have been accommodated in that vacancy or not is a matter to be considered by the Government.
7. The second important aspect is in regard to the claim of
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 11
Smitha with effect from 01.06.2010. It is to be noted Beeba.K.Nath and Rupesh were drawing salary from that period, in what manner the claim should be adjusted has to be considered by the Government. It is now submitted at the Bar that Rupesh as well as Beeba.K.Nath had been thrown out and deployed. Smitha is not entitled to get salary since she had not actually worked but at least she could be given notional benefits from original date of appointment. Anyway it is a matter for the Government to consider. In such circumstances I am of the view that the Government order has to be remitted for consideration only in regard to the following matters:-
1) Rival claim between Beeba.K.Nath and Rupesh.
2) The benefits claimed by Smitha from 01.06.2010. It is made clear that this Court had not interfered with the Government Order upholding the claim of seniority of Smitha. She is entitled to draw all salaries due to her. In the light of the Government Order, Smitha shall be given salary. In regard to Beeba.K.Nath and Rupesh, the department can disburse salary in accordance with the law. Needless to say, Beeba.K.Nath, Smitha, Rupesh and the Manager shall be given notice before taking decision. Needfull shall be done within three
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 12
months.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
**Sd/-**
**A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE**
**JUDGE**
sree
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 13
## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25388/2017**
## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:**
**EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.1.2012 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.**
**EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 14.3.2013. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.6.2011 ALONG WITH THE PROCEEDINGS FOR APPROVAL DATED 28.11.2013.**
**EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT, DATED 21.5.2012,. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.4.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.**
**EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.11.2014 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT APPEAL NO.1781/2015,DATED 21.10.2016 EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE SUBMITTED BY THE MANAGER DATED 23.2.2017,**
**EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF TEH GO(RT) NO.2098/17/G.EDN.DATED 29.6.2017. EXHIBIT P10 A COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 7TH AUGUST, 2017.**
**RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT R7(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER IN FORM 27 AND THE PROCEEDIGNS OF APPROVAL OF THE 4TH REPONDENT. EXHIBIT R7(B) A TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER OF THE SCHOOL FOR THE YEAR 2010-11 DATED 22.12.2011 EXHIBIT R7(C) A TRUE COPY OF THE GO(MS)NO.11/2002/G.EDN DATED 07.01.2002. EXHIBIT R7 (D) A TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.H2/544419/94 DATED 10.02.1995.**
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases
14
## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12788/2018**
## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:**
**EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.01.2012 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.**
**EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 14/3/2013.**
**EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2011 ALONG WITH THE PROCEEDINGS FOR APPROVAL DATED 28.11.2013.**
**EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT, DATED 21.5.2012.**
**EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.04.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.11.2014 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN THE WRIT APPEAL NO.1781/15. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE SUBMITTED BY THE MANAGER DATED 23/2/2017. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE GO(RT) NO. 2098/17/G.EDN. DATED 29/6/2017. EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC 28132/17 EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 26/3/2018. EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE DATED 1/12/2017. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT R6 (A) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF SMT.P.SMITHA DATED 18.10.2012 ALONG WITH THE INFORMATION NO.A1-7721/12/L.DIS.DATED 10.11.2012 OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER. EXHIBIT R6(B) TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERMENT DATED 11.11.2013.**
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases 15
## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28132/2017**
|**APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28132/2017**|**APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28132/2017**|
|---|---|
|**PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:**||
|**EXHIBIT P1-**|**A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT**|
||**EDUCATIONAL OFFICER IN THIS REGARD DATED**|
||**28/01/2012.**|
|**EXHIBIT P2-**|**A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DEPUTY**|
||**DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION DATED 14/03/2013.**|
|**EXHIBIT P3-**|**A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR OF**|
||**PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DATED 23/04/2013.**|
|**EXHIBIT P4-**|**A TRUE COPY OF THE CANCELLATION OF THE**|
||**APPOINTMENT OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED**|
||**21/05/2011.**|
|**EXHIBIT P5-**|**A TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT)4919/2014/G.EDN**|
||**DATED 11/11/2014.**|
|**EXHIBIT P6-**|**A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN WAS**|
||**NOS.1781, 1977 AND 2417 OF 2015 DATED**|
||**21/10/2016.**|
|**EXHIBIT P6(A)-**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE SUBMITTED BY**|
||**THE PETITIONER.**|
|**EXHIBIT P7-**|**A TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT)2098/2017/G.EDN**|
||**DATED 29/06/2017.**|
|**RESPONDENT'S EXHIBTS:**||
|**EXHIBIT R5(A)**|**TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT)**|
||**NO.4919/2014/G.EDN.DATED 11.11.2014**|
|**EXHIBIT R5(B)**|**TRUE COPY OF TEH ORDER**|
||**NO.F1/53423/2014/DPI/R.DIS DATED**|
||**19.09.2014..**|
WP(C).No. 25388 of 2017 and other connctd.cases
16
## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28756/2017**
## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:**
|**EXHIBIT P1**|**TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE**|
|---|---|
||**PETITIONER DATED 1/6/2010**|
|**EXHIBIT P2**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B6/5788/11 DATED**|
||**28/1/2012 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT**|
|**EXHIBIT P2 A**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B5/5768/11 DATED**|
||**28/1/2012 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT**|
|**EXHIBIT P3**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 7/2011 DATED**|
||**21/5/2012 OF THE MANAGER**|
|**EXHIBIT P4**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.**|
||**RA(4)65872/12/DPI/K.DIS. DATED 23/4/2013 OF**|
||**THE 2ND RESPONDENT**|
|**EXHIBIT P5**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.**|
||**RA(4)65872/12/DPI/K.DIS. DATED 23/4/2013 OF**|
||**THE 2ND RESPONDENT**|
|**EXHIBIT P6**|**TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER**|
||**NO.EM4/29472/2013/DPI/K.DIS. DATED 31/-10-**|
||**2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT**|
|**EXHIBIT P7**|**TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.**|
||**(RT)NO.4919/2014/G.EDN.DATED 11/11/2014 OF**|
||**THE GOVERNMENT**|
|**EXHIBIT P8**|**TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)**|
||**NO.32339/2014-N DATED 27/7/2015**|
|**EXHIBIT P9**|**TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1977/2015**|
||**DATED 21/10/2016**|
|**EXHIBIT P10**|**TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT)**|
||**NO.2098/2017/G.EDN. DATED 29/6/2017 OF THE**|
||**GOVERNMENT**|
**RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL**
**//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE Sd/-**